This article focuses on how newcomers form social relations when settling in the UK, and the role of these relations in regards to their sense of belonging as well as access to resources that support integration. By bringing together the concept of social integration with scholarship on embedding and sociabilities of emplacement, the article demonstrates how a combination of serendipitous encounters, ‘crucial acquaintances’ and more enduring friendships with other migrants, co-ethnics and members of the majority population support migrants’ settlement. Drawing on two qualitative studies on migrant settlement, it shows the importance of social relations with other migrants during settlement, and subsequently critically reflects on how the notion of ‘bridging social capital’ has been used in policy discourse. By doing so, the article contends that the notion of ‘integration’ needs to reflect the social ‘unit’ into which migrants are supposed to integrate.
AgerAStrangA (2008) Understanding integration: A conceptual framework. Journal of Refugee Studies21(2): 166–191.
2.
BerryJW (1997) Immigration, acculturation and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review46(1): 5–68.
3.
BlochAMcKayS (2014) Employment, social networks and undocumented migrants: The employer perspective. Sociology49(1): 38–55.
4.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJG (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwordpress, 241–259.
5.
BoydM (1989) Family and personal networks in international migration: Recent developments and new agendas. International Migration Review23(3): 638–670.
6.
CaseyL (2016) The Casey Review: A review into opportunity and integration. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
7.
CastlesSKoracMVastaEet al. (2002) Integration: Mapping the field. Oxford: Centre for Migration and Policy Research and Refugee Studies Centre for the Home Office.
8.
CheungSYPhillimoreJ (2014) Refugees, social capital and labour market integration in the UK. Sociology48(3): 518–536.
9.
CheungSPhillimoreJ (2016) Gender and refugee integration: A quantitative analysis of integration and social policy outcomes. Journal of Social Policy46(2): 211–230.
FindlayAMStockdaleA (2003) The temporal and social embeddedness of migration: A methodological exploration using biographical analysis. Geography Research Forum23: 4–29.
12.
Glick SchillerNÇağlarA (2013) Locating migrant pathways of economic emplacement: Thinking beyond the ethnic lens. Ethnicities13(4): 494–514.
13.
Glick SchillerNÇağlarA (2016) Displacement, emplacement and migrant newcomers: Rethinking urban sociabilities within multiscalar power. Identities23(1): 17–34.
14.
Glick SchillerNTsypylmaDGruner-DomicS (2011) Defining cosmopolitan sociability in a transnational age: An introduction. Ethnic and Racial Studies34(3): 399–418.
15.
GranovetterM (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78: 1360–1380.
16.
GranovetterM (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology91(3): 481–510.
17.
Grzymala-KazlowskaAPhillimoreJ (2017) Introduction: Rethinking integration. New perspectives on adaption and settlement in the era of superdiversity. Journal and Ethnic and Migration Studies44(2): 179–196.
HeckmannFSchnapperD (2003) The Integration of Immigrants in European Societies: National Differences and Trends of Convergence. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.
20.
HickmanMJMaiNCrowleyH (2012) Migration and Social Cohesion in the UK. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
Home Office (2005) Integration Matters: A National Strategy for Refugee Integration (London: IND communications team and Home Office communications directorate).
22.
JenkinsR (1967) Essays and Speeches. London: Collins.
23.
KorinekKEntwisleBAreeJ (2005) Through thick and thin: Layers of social ties and urban settlement among Thai migrants. American Sociological Review70(5): 779–800.
24.
PattonMQ (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
25.
PhillimoreJ (2012) Implementing integration in the UK: Lessons for theory, policy and practice. Policy and Politics40(4): 525–545.
26.
PhillimoreJHumphrisRKhanK (2017) Reciprocity for new migrant integration: Resource conservation, investment and exchange. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies44(2): 215–232.
27.
PolanyiKArensbergCPearsonH (1957) Trade and Markets in the Early Empires. New York: Free Press.
28.
PortesA (1998) Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology24: 1–24.
29.
PortesASensenbrennerJ (1993) Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology98(6): 1320–1350.
30.
PutnamRD (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
31.
RobinsonD (2010) The neighbourhood effects of new immigration. Environment and Planning A42: 2451–2466.
32.
RyanL (2011) Migrants’ social networks and weak ties: Accessing resources and constructing relationships post-migration. Sociological Review59: 707–724.
33.
RyanLMulhollandJ (2014) French connections: The networking strategies of French highly skilled migrants in London. Global Networks14(2): 148–166.
34.
RyanLMulhollandJ (2015) Embedding in motion: Analysing relational, spatial and temporal dynamics among highly skilled migrants. In: RyanLErelUD’AngeloA (eds) Migrant Capital: Networks, Identities and Strategies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 135–154.
35.
RyanLSalesRTilkiMet al. (2009) Family strategies and transnational migration: Recent Polish migrants in London. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies35(1): 61–77.
36.
SimmelG (1995 [1903]) The metropolis and mental life. In: KasnitP (ed.) Metropolis: Center and Symbol of Our Times. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 30–45.
37.
SimmelGHughesEC (1949) The sociology of sociability. American Journal of Sociology55(3): 254–261.
38.
TönniesF (2005 [1887]) Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
39.
VermeulenHPenninxR (2000) Immigrant Integration: The Dutch Case. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
40.
VertovecS (2007) Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies30(6): 1024–1054.
41.
WessendorfS (2014) Commonplace Diversity: Social Relations in a Super-Diverse Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
42.
WessendorfS (2017a) Pathways of settlement among pioneer migrants in super-diverse London. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies44(2): 270–286.
43.
WessendorfS (2017b) Pioneer migrants and their social relations in super-diverse London. Ethnic and Racial Studies. Epub ahead of print 29November2017. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2017.1406126.
44.
Yuval-DavisN (2006) Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice40(3): 197–214.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
