Using time diary evidence on change in the frequency and distribution of activities from UK time diary data over the 15 years from the turn of the 21st century, we assess whether the thesis of ‘the speed-up society’ is manifested in an increase in time intensity in people’s daily lives. Comparing indictors like time fragmentation, multitasking and ICT use, to respondents’ reports of how rushed they normally feel, we find no evidence that time pressure is increasing, or that ICT use is associated with greater feelings of time pressure. Rather, we find consistent cross-sectional differentials in our measures of time intensity by gender and occupational status, supporting the idea of relative stasis in the underlying social inequalities of time. These findings are consistent with previous research based on time use data, and we pose them as a challenge to theories of societal speed-up.
BeckU (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE.
2.
BeckUGiddensALashS (1994) Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
3.
BeckerGS (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal75(299): 493–517.
4.
BianchiSMRobinsonJPMilkieMA (2006) The Changing Rhythm of American Family Life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
5.
BittmanMWajcmanJ (2000) The rush hour: The character of leisure time and gender equity. Social Forces79: 165–189.
6.
BittmanMBrownJEWajcmanJ (2009) The mobile phone, perpetual contact and time pressure. Work, Employment and Society23(4): 673–691.
7.
CastellsM (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
8.
ColtraneS (2000) Research on household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family62: 1209–1233.
9.
ColvileR (2016) The Great Acceleration: How the World Is Getting Faster, Faster. New York: Bloomsbury.
10.
CraryJ (2013) 24/7: Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep. London: Verso Books.
11.
GeistCCohenP (2011) Headed toward equality? Housework change in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family73: 832–844.
12.
GershunyJ (2000) Changing Times: Work and Leisure in Postindustrial Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
GershunyJ (2005) Busyness as the badge of honor for the new superordinate working class. Social Research72(2): 287–314.
14.
GiddensA (1999) Runaway World: How Globalisation Is Reshaping Our Lives. London: Profile Books.
15.
HochschildA (1989) The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
16.
HochschildA (1997) The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
17.
JacobsJGersonK (1998) Who are the overworked Americans?Review of Social Economy56: 442–459.
18.
JacobsJAGersonK (2005) The Time Divide: Work, Family and Gender Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
JaroszE (2015) The duration and dynamics of leisure among the working population in Poland: A time-use approach. World Leisure Journal58(1): 44–59.
20.
Kaufman-ScarboroughC (2006) Time use and the impact of technology: Examining workspaces in the home. Time & Society15(1): 57–80.
21.
LinderSB (1970) The Harried Leisure Class. New York: Columbia University Press.
22.
MattinglyMJBianchiSM (2003) Gender differences in the quantity and quality of free time: The U.S. experience. Social Forces81: 999–1029.
23.
OfferSSchneiderB (2011) Revisiting the gender gap in time-use patterns: Multitasking and well-being among mothers and fathers in dual-earner families. American Sociological Review76: 809–833.
24.
RobinsonJRGodbeyG (1999 [1997]) Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Spend Their Time. Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
25.
RosaH (2003) Social acceleration: Ethical and political consequences of a desynchronized high-speed society. Constellations10(1): 3–33.
26.
RosaH (2013) Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
27.
SayerL (2007) More work for mothers? Trends and gender differences in multitasking. In: Van Der LippeTPetersP (eds) Competing Claims in Work and Family Life. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 41–55.
28.
SayerLEnglandPBittmanMet al (2009) How long is the second (plus first) shift? Gender differences in paid, unpaid, and total work time in Australia and the United States. Journal of Comparative Family Studies40: 523–544.
29.
SchorJ (1992) The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure. New York: Basic Books.
30.
SchulteB (2014) Overwhelmed: Work, Love and Play When No-One Has the Time. New York: Sarah Crichton Books.
31.
SevillaAGimenez-NadelJGershunyJ (2012) Leisure inequality in the United States: 1965–2003. Demography49: 939–964.
32.
SouthertonD (2006) Analysing the temporal organization of daily life: Social constraints, practices and their allocation. Sociology40(3): 435–454.
33.
SouthertonDTomlinsonM (2005) Pressed for time: The differential impacts of a ‘time squeeze’. The Sociological Review53: 215–239.
34.
SullivanO (1997) Time waits for no (wo)man: An investigation of the gendered experience of domestic time. Sociology31(2): 221–239.
35.
SullivanO (2006) Changing Gender Relations, Changing Families: Tracing the Pace of Change. New York: Rowman and Littlefield (Gender Lens Series).
36.
SullivanO (2008) Busyness, status distinction and consumption strategies of the income-rich, time-poor. Time & Society17(1): 71–92.
37.
SullivanOGershunyJ (2013) Domestic outsourcing and multitasking: How much do they really contribute?Social Science Research42: 1311–1324.
38.
SullivanOKatz-GerroT (2007) The omnivorousness thesis revisited: Voracious cultural consumers. European Sociological Review23(2): 123–137.
39.
UrryJ (2000) Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.
40.
VeblenT (1994 [1899]) The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. New York: Penguin Books.
41.
WajcmanJ (2015) Pressed for Time: The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
