After reviewing social exchange theory and identifying emotions as key to exchange relations the article introduces Chinese guanxi as a form of gift exchange, elsewhere treated in terms of its network attributes. The obligatory nature of exchange, noted by Mauss and extensively discussed by Blau, is explained through ‘social sentiments’ that substantiate assurance in exchange. The emotions-complexes renqing and ganqing, basic to guanxi, are outlined. Social esteem as a consequence of participation in exchange distinguishes the latter from bribery, in which coercion predominates. The article advances sociological understanding in these and associated ways by regarding exchange and guanxi as arenas of emotion practices.
BarbaletJ (2014) The structure of guanxi: Resolving problems of network assurance. Theory and Society43(1): 51–69.
2.
BarbaletJ (2015) Guanxi, tie strength and network attributes. American Behavioral Scientist59(8): 1038–1050.
3.
BlauPM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
4.
ChangK-C (2011) A path to understanding guanxi in China’s transitional economy. Sociological Theory29(4): 315–339.
5.
ChangX (2009) Guanxi or Lishang Wanglai? Reciprocity, Social Support Networks and Social Creativity in a Chinese Village. Taipei: Airiti Press.
6.
ChenCCChenX-PHuangS (2013) Chinese guanxi: An integrative review and directions for future research. Management and Organization Review9(1): 167–207.
7.
ChenX-PChenCC (2004) On the intricacies of the Chinese guanxi. Asia Pacific Journal of Management21(3): 305–324.
8.
CoaseRH (1988) Blackmail. Virginia Law Review74(4): 655–676.
9.
CookKSEmersonRM (1978) Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review43(5): 721–739.
10.
CookKSWhitmeyerJM (1992) Two approaches to social structure: Exchange theory and network analysis. Annual Review of Sociology18: 109–127.
11.
EisenstadtSNRonigerL (1984) Patrons, Clients and Friends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
EkehP (1974) Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
EmersonRM (1962) Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review27(1): 31–41.
14.
EmersonRM (1972a) Exchange theory, part I: A psychological basis for social exchange. In: BergerJZelditchMAndersonB (eds) Sociological Theories in Progress, Vol. 2. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 38–57.
15.
EmersonRM (1972b) Exchange theory, part II: Exchange relations and network structures. In: BergerJZelditchMAndersonB (eds) Sociological Theories in Progress, Vol. 2. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 58–87.
16.
FanY (2002) Questioning guanxi: Definition, classification and implications. International Business Review11(5): 543–561.
17.
FriedMH (1974) Fabric of Chinese Society. New York: Octagon Books.
18.
GoldTB (1985) After comradeship: Personal relations in China since the cultural revolution. The China Quarterly104: 657–675.
19.
GouldnerAW (1960) The norm of reciprocity. American Sociological Review25(2): 161–178.
20.
HirschmanAO (1977) The Passions and the Interests. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
HochschildAR (1983) The Managed Heart. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
22.
HomansGC (1958) Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology63(6): 597–606.
23.
HuangX (2008) Guanxi networks and job searches in China’s emerging labour market. Work, Employment and Society22(3): 467–484.
24.
HwangK-K (1987) Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology92(4): 944–974.
25.
JacobsJB (1979) A preliminary model of particularistic ties in Chinese political alliances: Kan-ch’ing and kuan-hsi in a rural Taiwanese township. China Quarterly78: 237–273.
26.
KingAY-C (1991) Kuan-hsi and network building: A sociological interpretation. Daedalus120(2): 63–84.
27.
KipnisAB (1997) Producing Guanxi: Sentiment, Self and Subculture in a North China Village. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
28.
LawlerEJ (2001) An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology107(2): 321–352.
29.
LawlerEJThyeSRYoonJ (2009) Social Commitments in a Depersonalized World. New York: Russell Sage.
30.
LeeDYDawesPL (2005) Guanxi, trust, and long-term orientation in Chinese business markets. Journal of International Marketing13(2): 26–56.
31.
LiuLMeiS (2015) How an indigenous concept entered the international academic circle: The case of guanxi. Scientometrics105(1): 645–663.
32.
LuoJ-DYehY-C (2012) Neither collectivism nor individualism: Trust in Chinese guanxi. Journal of Trust Research2(1): 53–70.
33.
LuoY (2007) Guanxi and Business. Singapore: World Scientific.
34.
LuoY (2008) The changing Chinese culture and business behavior: The perspective of intertwinement between guanxi and corruption. International Business Review17(2): 188–193.
35.
MaussM (2002) The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Routledge.
36.
OiJC (1985) Communism and clientelism: Rural politics in China. World Politics37(2): 238–266.
37.
OsburgJ (2013) Anxious Wealth: Money and Morality among China’s New Rich. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
38.
QiX (2012) A case study of globalized knowledge flow: Guanxi in social science and management theory. International Sociology27(6): 707–723.
39.
QiX (2013) Guanxi, social capital theory and beyond. British Journal of Sociology64(2): 308–324.
40.
SimmelG (1971) How is society possible? In: LevineDN (ed.) Georg Simmel: On Individuality and Social Forms. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 6–22.
41.
SimmelG (1978) The Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge.
42.
SimmelG (2008) Sociology of competition. Canadian Journal of Sociology33(4): 957–978.
43.
SmartA (1993) Gifts, bribes, and guanxi: A reconsideration of Bourdieu’s social capital. Cultural Anthropology8(3): 388–408.
44.
SmartAHsuCL (2007) Corruption or social capital? Tact and the performance of guanxi in market socialist China. In: NuijtenMAndersG (eds) Corruption and the Secret of Law. London: Ashgate, 167–189.
45.
SmithA (1979) The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
Smith-CroweKWarrenDE (2014) The emotion-evoked collective corruption model: The role of emotion in the spread of corruption within organizations. Organization Science25(4): 1154–1171.
47.
SteidlmeierP (1999) Gift giving, bribery and corruption: Ethical management of business relationships in China. Journal of Business Ethics20(2): 121–132.
48.
SunXZhuJWuY (2014) Organizational clientelism: An analysis of private entrepreneurs in Chinese local legislatures. Journal of East Asian Studies14(1): 1–29.
49.
TongCKYongPK (1998) Guanxi bases, xinyong, and Chinese business networks. British Journal of Sociology49(1): 75–96.
50.
WangP (2014) Extra-legal protection in China: How guanxi distorts China’s legal system and facilitates the rise of unlawful protectors. British Journal of Criminology54(5): 809–830.
51.
WankD (1996) The institutional process of market clientelism: Guanxi and private business in a south China city. The China Quarterly147: 820–838.
52.
WankD (2002) Business-state clientelism in China: Decline or evolution? In: GoldTGuthrieDWankD (eds) Social Connections in China: Institutions, Culture and the Changing Nature of Guanxi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 97–115.
53.
WilsonRKEckelCC (2011) Trust and social exchange. In: DruckmanJNGreenDPKuklinskiJH. (eds) Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 243–257.
54.
WilsonS (2002) Face, norms and instrumentality. In: GoldTGuthrieDWankD (eds) Social Connections in China: Institutions, Culture and the Changing Nature of Guanxi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 163–178.
55.
YanY (1996) The Flow of Gifts: Reciprocity and Social Networks in a Chinese Village. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
56.
YangMM-H (1994) Gifts, Favors and Banquets: The Art of Social Relationship in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
