The under-representation of women in the UK engineering and construction sectors seems resolute. Using a Bourdieusian lens, this article examines the persistence of everyday sexism and gender inequality in male-dominated professions. Bringing together findings from three research projects with engineering and construction industry students and professionals, we find that women experience gendered treatment in everyday interactions with peers. Patterns of(mis)recognition and resistance are complex, with some women expressing views which reproduce and naturalise gender inequality. In contrast, other women recognise and resist such essentialism through a range of actions including gender equity campaigning. Through a Bourdieusian analysis of the everyday, this article calls into question existing policy recommendations that argue women have different skills that can be brought to the sector. Such recommendations reinforce the gendered nature of the engineering and construction sectors’ habitus and fail to recognise how the underlying structures and practices of the sector reproduce gendered working practices.
AdkinsLSkeggsB (eds) (2004) Feminism after Bourdieu. Oxford: Blackwell, 3–18.
2.
AndersonG (2008) Mapping academic resistance in the managerial university. Organization15(2): 251–270.
3.
BarnardSPowellABagilholeBDaintyA (2010) Researching UK women professionals in SET: A critical review of current approaches. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology2(3): 361–381.
4.
BatesL (2014) Everyday Sexism. London: Simon and Schuster.
5.
BeckerJCSwimJK (2011) Seeing the unseen attention to daily encounters with sexism as way to reduce sexist beliefs. Psychology of Women Quarterly35(2): 227–242.
6.
BenokraitisNVFeaginJR (1986) Modern Sexism: Blatant, Subtle and Covert Discrimination. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
7.
BergSH (2006) Everyday sexism and posttraumatic stress disorder in women. Violence Against Women12(10): 970–988.
8.
BoltonSCMuzioD (2007) Can’t live with ‘em, can’t live without ‘em: Gendered segmentation in the legal profession. Sociology41(1): 47–64.
9.
BourdieuP (1986) Force of law: Toward a sociology of the judicial field. The Hastings Law Journal38: 805.
BourdieuPWacquantL (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
13.
BourgoisPPrinceBMossA (2004) The everyday violence of Hepatitis C among young women who inject drugs in San Francisco. Human Organization63(3): 253–264.
14.
CockburnC (1991) In the Way of Women: Men’s Resistance to Sex Equality in Organisations. London: Macmillan.
15.
CrowGPopeC (2008) Editorial foreword: Sociology and everyday life. Sociology42(4): 597–600.
16.
DryburghH (1999) Work hard, play hard: Women and professionalization in engineering – adapting to the culture. Gender & Society13(5): 664–682.
17.
EveringhamCStevensonDWarner-SmithP (2007) ‘Things are getting better all the time?’ Challenging the narrative of women’s progress from a generational perspective. Sociology41(3): 419–437.
18.
FaulknerW (2005) Becoming and belonging: Gendered processes in engineering. In: ArchibaldJEmmsJGrundyF. (eds) The Gender Politics of ICT. London: Middlesex University Press, 15–25.
19.
FisherVKinseyS (2014) Behind closed doors! Homosocial desire and the academic boys club. Gender in Management: An International Journal29(1): 44–64.
20.
FowlerBWilsonE (2004) Women architects and their discontents. Sociology38(1): 101–119.
21.
FriedmanS (2011). The cultural currency of a ‘good’ sense of humour: British comedy and new forms of distinction. The British Journal of Sociology62(2): 347–370.
22.
GervaisSJHillardALVescioTK (2010) Confronting sexism: The role of relationship orientation and gender. Sex Roles63(7–8): 463–474.
23.
GraciaL (2009) Employability and higher education: Contextualising female students’ workplace experiences to enhance understanding of employability development. Journal of Education and Work22(4): 301–318.
24.
GuerrierTEvansCGloverJ. (2009) ‘Technical, but not very…’: Constructing gendered identities in IT-related employment. Work, Employment & Society23(3): 494–511.
25.
HammersleyM (2010) Can we re-use qualitative data via secondary analysis? Notes on some terminological and substantive issues. Sociological Research Online15(1): 5.
26.
HolmesJ (2000) Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies2(2): 159–185.
27.
HuppatzK (2009) Reworking Bourdieu’s ‘capital’: Feminine and female capitals in the field of paid caring work. Sociology43(1): 45–66.
28.
KanterRM (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
29.
KumraSVinnicombeS (2010) Impressing for success: A gendered analysis of a key social capital accumulation strategy. Gender, Work & Organization17(5): 521–546.
30.
LawlerS (2004) Rules of engagement: Habitus, power and resistance. The Sociological Review52(s2): 110–128.
31.
LovellT (2000) Thinking feminism with and against Bourdieu. Feminist Theory1(1): 11–32.
32.
LovellT (2004) Bourdieu, class and gender: ‘The return of the living dead’?The Sociological Review52(s2): 35–56.
33.
LymanP (1987) The fraternal bond as a joking relationship: A case study of the role of sexist jokes in male group bonding. In: KimmelMS (ed.) Changing Men: New Directions in Research on Men and Masculinity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 148–163.
34.
MartinPY (2006) Practicing gender at work: Further thoughts on reflexivity. Gender, Work and Organization13(3): 254–276.
35.
McCallL (1992) Does gender fit? Bourdieu, feminism and conceptions of social order. Theory and Society21(6): 837–867.
36.
McRobbieA (2004) Notes on ‘What Not To Wear’ and post-feminist symbolic violence. The Sociological Review52(s2): 97–109.
37.
MillerGE (2002) The frontier, entrepreneurialism and engineers: Women coping with a web of masculinities in an organizational culture. Culture and Organization8(2): 145–160.
38.
MoiT (1991) Appropriating Bourdieu: Feminist theory and Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology of culture. New Literary History22(4): 1017–1049.
39.
NkomoSM (1992) The emperor has no clothes: Rewriting ‘race in organizations’. The Academy of Management Journal17(3): 487–513.
40.
PeelE (2001) Mundane heterosexism: Understanding incidents of the everyday. Women’s Studies International Forum24(5): 541–554.
41.
PinkS (2012) Situating Everyday Life. London: Sage.
42.
PowellABagilholeBDaintyA (2006) The problem of women’s assimilation into UK engineering cultures: Can critical mass work?Equal Opportunities International25(8): 688–699.
43.
PowellABagilholeBDaintyA (2009) How women engineers do and undo gender: Consequences for gender equality. Gender, Work and Organization16(4): 411–428.
44.
PowellADaintyABagilholeB (2011) A poisoned chalice? Why UK women engineering and technology students may receive more ‘help’ than their male peers. Gender and Education23(5): 585–599.
45.
PrasadAPrasadP (1998) Everyday struggles at the workplace: The nature and implications of routine resistance in contemporary organizations. In: BambergerPASonnenstuhlWJ (eds) Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Deviance in and of Organizations. London: JAI Press, 225–257.
46.
ReayD (2004a) ‘It’s all becoming a habitus’: Beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research. British Journal of Sociology of Education25(4): 431–444.
47.
ReayD (2004b) Gendering Bourdieu’s concepts of capitals? Emotional capital, women and social class. The Sociological Review52(s2): 57–74.
48.
SangKJCPowellA (2012) Equality, diversity, inclusion and work-life balance in construction. In: DaintyALoosemoreM (eds) Human Resource Management in Construction: Critical Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge, 163–196.
49.
SangKJCDaintyAIsonSG (2014) Gender in the UK architectural profession: (Re)producing and challenging hegemonic masculinity. Work, Employment & Society28(2): 247–264.
50.
SayerA (2005) Class, moral worth and recognition. Sociology39(5): 947–963.
51.
SchippersM (2007) Recovering the feminine other: Masculinity, femininity and the gender order. Theory and Society36(1): 85–102.
SkeggsB (2004) Context and background: Pierre Bourdieu’s analysis of class, gender and sexuality. The Sociological Review52(s2): 19–33.
54.
SmithDE (1987) The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
55.
SmithL (2013) Trading in gender for women in trades: Embodying hegemonic masculinity, femininity and being a gender hotrod. Construction Management and Economics31(8): 861–873.
56.
Van den BergH (2008) Reanalyzing qualitative interviews from different angles: The risk of decontextualization and other problems of sharing qualitative data. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung33(3): 179–192.
57.
WalkerM (2001) Engineering identities. British Journal of Sociology of Education22(1): 75–89.
58.
WattsJ (2007) Can’t take a joke? Humour as resistance, refuge and exclusion in a highly gendered workplace. Feminism and Psychology17(2): 259–266.
59.
WebbJSchiratoTDanaherG (2002) Understanding Bourdieu. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin.
60.
WhittockM (2002) Women’s experiences of non-traditional employment: Is gender equality in this area possible?Construction Management and Economics20(5): 449–456.
61.
WitzA (1990) Patriarchy and professions: The gendered politics of occupational closure. Sociology24(4): 675–690.
62.
WitzA (2004) Anamnesis and amnesis in Bourdieu’s work: The case for a feminist anamnesis. The Sociological Review52(s2): 211–223.
