The concept of relationality has recently found widespread favour in British sociology, particularly in the emergent sub-field of the sociology of personal life, which is characterized by its attachment to the concept. However, this ‘relational turn’ is under-theorized and pays little attention to the substantial history of relational thinking across the human sciences. This article argues that the notion of relationality in the sociology of personal life might be strengthened by an exploration of the conceptualization of the relational person and relational processes offered by three bodies of literature: the process-oriented thinking of American pragmatism, specifically of Mead and Emirbayer; the figurational sociology of Elias; and psychoanalysis, particularly the object relations tradition, contemporary relational psychoanalysis, and Ettinger’s notion of transubjectivity. The article attends particularly to the processes involved in the individuality, agentic reflexivity and affective dimensions of the relational person.
BrownD (1997) Conversation with Norbert Elias. Group Analysis30: 515–24.
12.
ButlerJ (1997) The Psychic Life of Power: Theories of Subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
CarstenJ (2004) After Kinship. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
CastrénA-MKetokiviK (forthcoming) Studying the complex dynamics of family relationships: A figurational approach. Sociological Research Online.
15.
ChodorowN (1999) Toward a relational individualism. In: MitchellSAAronL (eds) Relational Psychoanalysis: The Emergence of a Tradition. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, 109–30.
16.
CooleyC (1967 [1909]) The social self. In: ParsonsTShilsENaegeleK (eds) Theories of Society: Foundations of Modern Sociological Theory. Vol. 2. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 822–28.
17.
CrossleyN (2011) Towards Relational Sociology. London and New York: Routledge.
18.
da SilvaFC (2007) G. H. Mead: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
19.
DeweyJBentleyAF (1949) Knowing and the Known. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
20.
DimenM (2003) Sexuality, Intimacy, Power – Relational Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.
21.
DinnersteinD (1976) The Mermaid and the Minotaur: Sexual Arrangements and Human Malaise. New York: Harper & Row.
22.
DonatiP (2011) Modernization and relational reflexivity. International Review of Sociology21(1): 21–39.
23.
DuncanSEdwardsRAlldredPReynoldsT (2003) Mothers and childcare: Policies, values and theories. Children and Society18(4): 245–65.
24.
EdwardsRGilliesV (2012) Farewell to family? Notes on an argument for retaining the concept. Families, Relationships and Societies1(1): 63–69.
25.
EdwardsRRibbens McCarthyJGilliesV (2012) The politics of concepts: Family and its (putative) replacements. British Journal of Sociology63(4): 730–46.
26.
EliasN (1978) What is Sociology?New York: Columbia University Press.
27.
EliasN (2014) Freud’s concept of society and beyond it. In: JolyM (ed) Supplements and Index to the Collected Works, Collected Works vol. 18. Dublin: University College Dublin Press, 13–52.
28.
EmirbayerM (1997) Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology103(2): 281–317.
29.
EttingerB (2006a) The Matrixial Borderspace. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
30.
EttingerB (2006b) Matrixial trans-subjectivity. Theory, Culture and Society23(2–3): 218–22.
31.
FairbairnWRD (1952) Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality. London: Tavistock Publications.
32.
FinchJ (1989) Family Obligations and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
33.
FinchJMasonJ (1993) Negotiating Family Responsibilities. London: Tavistock/Routledge.
34.
FrommE (1941) Escape from Freedom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
35.
FrommE (1947) Man for Himself: An Inquiry into the Psychology of Ethics. Greenwich, CT: Fawcett Premier.
36.
FreudS (1984 [1923]) The Ego and the Id. In: On Metapsychology: The Theory of Psychoanalysis. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
37.
GabbJ (2011) Family lives and relational living: Taking account of otherness. Sociological Research Online16(4): 10.
38.
GiddensA (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
39.
GiddensA (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
40.
GreenbergJMitchellS (1983) Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
GriffithsM (1995) Feminisms and the Self: The Web of Identity. London and New York: Routledge.
42.
GronowA (2008) The over- or the undersocialized conception of man? Practice theory and the problem of intersubjectivity. Sociology42(2): 243–59.
43.
HolmesM (2004) An equal distance? Individualisation, gender and intimacy in distance relationships. The Sociological Review52(2): 180–200.
44.
JamiesonL (1998) Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
45.
JamiesonLMilneS (2012) Children and young people’s relationships, relational processes and social change: Reading across worlds. Children’s Geographies10(3): 265–78.
46.
KetokiviK (2008) Biographical disruption, the wounded self and the reconfiguration of significant others. In WidmerEJallinojaR (eds) Beyond the Nuclear Family: Families in a Configurational Perspective. Bern: Peter Lang, 255–78.
47.
KilpinenE (2013) George H. Mead as an empirically responsible philosopher: The ‘philosophy of the act’ reconsidered. In: BurkeTSkowronskiK (eds) George Herbert Mead in the Twenty-First Century. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 3–20.
48.
KleinM (1948) Contributions to Psycho-analysis 1921-1945. London: The Hogarth Press.
49.
LaplancheJPontalisJ-B (1973) The Language of Psycho-analysis. London: Hogarth Press.
50.
LavieJ (2005) The lost roots of group analysis: Taking interrelational individuals seriously. Group Analysis35(2): 333–35.
LaytonL (2004) Who’s That girl? Who’s That Boy? Clinical Practice Meets Postmodern Gender Theory. New York: Analytic Press.
53.
LevinI (2004) Living apart together: A new family form. Current Sociology52(2): 223–40.
54.
MasonJ (2004) Personal narratives, relational selves: Residential histories in the living and telling. The Sociological Review52(2): 162–79.
55.
MayV (ed.) (2011) Sociology of Personal Life. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
56.
MeadGH (1934) Mind, Self, and Society from a Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
57.
MeadGH (1961) Internalized others and the self. In: ParsonsTShilsENaegeleK (eds) Theories of Society: Foundations of Modern Sociological Theory. Vol. 2. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 829–30.
58.
MennellS (2011) Sociology Needs a Historical Social Psychology: Norbert Elias’s Final Critique of Sigmund Freud. Paper given at the British Sociological Association Sociology, Psychoanalysis and the Psychosocial Study Group Inaugural Meetings, Birkbeck, University of London, October2011. Available at: http://www.stephenmennell.eu/docs/pdf/SJMEliasFreud.pdf (accessed 11 December 2014).
MischeA (2011) Relational sociology, culture and agency. In: ScottJCarringtonP (eds) SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
61.
MitchellSA (2000) Relationality: From Attachment to Intersubjectivity. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
62.
MitchellSAAronL (eds) (1999) Relational Psychoanalysis: The Emergence of a Tradition. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
63.
MorganD (1996) Family Connections: An Introduction to Family Studies. Cambridge: Polity.
64.
MorganD (2011) Rethinking Family Practices. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
65.
Ribbens McCarthyJ (2012) The powerful relational language of ‘family’: Togetherness, belonging and personhood. The Sociological Review60(1): 68–90.
66.
RiviereJ (1952) The unconscious phantasy of an inner world reflected in examples from literature. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis33: 160–72.
67.
RoseneilS (2000) Queer frameworks and queer tendencies: Towards an understanding of postmodern transformations of sexuality. Sociological Research Online5(3): 1–19. Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/3/roseneil.html
68.
RoseneilSBudgeonS (2004) Cultures of intimacy and care beyond the family: Personal life and social change in the early twenty-first century. Current Sociology52(2): 135–59.
69.
RoseneilS (2006) The ambivalences of Angel’s ‘arrangement’: A psycho-social lens on the contemporary condition of personal life. The Sociological Review54(4): 846–68.
70.
RoseneilS (2007) Queer individualization: The transformation of personal life in the early 21st century. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research15(2/3): 84–99.
71.
RoseneilS (2009) Haunting in an age of individualization: Subjectivity, relationality and the traces of the lives of others. European Societies11(3): 411–30.
72.
RoseneilS (2013) The vicissitudes of post-colonial citizenship and belonging. In: RoseneilS (ed) Beyond Citizenship? Feminism and the Transformation of Belonging. Palgrave Macmillan: 231–65.
73.
SmartC (2007) Personal Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
74.
SmartC (2011) Relationality and socio-cultural theories of family life. In: JallinojaRWidmerE (eds) Families and Kinship in Contemporary Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 13–28.
75.
SmithK (2012) From dividual and individual selves to porous subjects. The Australian Journal of Anthropology23(1): 50–64.
76.
SomersM (1994) The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society23(5): 605–49.
StrathernM (1992) After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
79.
StrathernM (2014) Reading relations backwards. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S)20, 3–19.
80.
SullivanHS (1953) The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. New York: The William Alanson White Psychiatric Foundation.
81.
WestonK (1991) Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays and Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.
82.
WinnicottDW (1958) Collected Papers: Through Paediatrics to Psychoanalysis. London: Tavistock Publications.
83.
WinnicottDW (1965) The Family and Individual Development. London: Tavistock Publications.
84.
WolcottIHughesJ (1999) Towards Understanding the Reasons for Divorce. Working Paper No. 20. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
