This article explores the place of ‘ethnicity’ in the operation, management and contestation of the UK National DNA Database (NDNAD). In doing so, it examines the limitations of bioethics as a response to political questions raised by the new genetics. The UK police forensic database has been racialised in a number of distinct ways: in the over-representation of black people in the database population; in the classification of all DNA profiles according to ‘ethnic appearance’; in the use of data for experiments to determine the ethnicity of crime scene DNA; and in the focus on ethnicity in public debate about the database. This racialisation presented potential problems of legitimacy for the NDNAD but, as the article shows, these have been partly neutralised through systems of ethico-political governance. In these systems of governance discussion of institutional racism has been postponed or displaced by other ways of talking about ethnicity and identity.
AhmedS (2004) Declarations of whiteness: The non-performativity of anti-racism. Borderlands3(2).
2.
AhmedS (2007) ‘You end up doing the document rather than doing the doing’: Diversity, race equality and the politics of documentation. Ethnic and Racial Studies30(4): 590–609.
3.
AmooreL (2006) Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror. Political Geography25(3): 336–51.
4.
BennettoJ (2010) Police and Racism: What Has Been Achieved 10 years after the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry Report?London: Equality and Human Rights Commission.
5.
Black Mental Health (2012) The National DNA Database and Black Britain. Special Edition of Solution MagazineMay/June.
6.
ColeSA (2007) How much justice can technology afford? The impact of DNA technology on equal criminal justice. Science and Public Policy34(2): 95–107.
7.
ColeSALynchM (2006) The social and legal construction of suspects. Annual Review of Law & Social Science2: 39–60.
8.
DusterT (2004) Selective arrests, an ever-expanding DNA forensic database, and the specter of an early-twenty-first-century equivalent of phrenology. In: LazerD (ed.) DNA and the Criminal Justice System. London: MIT Press, 315–34.
9.
El-HajNA (2007) The genetic reinscription of race. Annual Review of Anthropology36(1): 283–300.
10.
ElmerGOpelA (2008) Preempting Dissent: The Politics of an Inevitable Future. Winnipeg: Arbeiter Ring Publishing.
11.
FosterJNewburnTSouhamiA (2005) Assessing the Impact of the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
12.
FortunM (2008) Promising Genomics: Iceland and DeCODE Genetics in a World of Speculation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
FujimuraJHRajagopalanR (2011) Different differences: The use of ‘genetic ancestry’ versus race in biomedical human genetic research. Social Studies of Science41(1): 5–30.
14.
FullwileyD (2007) The molecularization of race: Institutionalizing human difference in pharmacogenetics practice. Science as Culture16(1): 1–30.
GillbornD (2008) Racism and Education: Coincidence or Conspiracy?London: Routledge.
17.
GottweisHLaussG (2012) Biobank governance: Heterogeneous modes of ordering and democratization. Journal of Community Genetics3(2): 61–72.
18.
GreelyHTRiordanDPGarrisonNPMountainJL (2006) Family ties: The use of DNA offender databases to catch offenders’ kin. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics34(2): 248–62.
19.
HaggertyKDEricsonVE (2000) The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology51(4): 605–22.
20.
HedgecoeA (2010) Bioethics and the reinforcement of socio-technical expectations. Social Studies of Science40(2): 163–86.
21.
HindmarshRPrainsackB (eds) (2010) Genetic Suspects: Global Governance of Forensic DNA Profiling and Databasing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
HoeyerKLTuttonR (2005) ‘Ethics was here’: Studying the language-games of ethics in the case of UK Biobank. Critical Public Health15(4): 385–97.
23.
Home Office (2009) Consultation: Keeping the Right People on the Database. London: Home Office.
24.
House of Commons Home Affairs Committee (2007) Young Black People and the Criminal Justice System 2006–07. London: Stationery Office.
25.
House of Commons Home Affairs Committee (2008) A Surveillance Society? Fifth Report of Session 2007–08. London: Stationery Office.
26.
House of Commons Home Affairs Committee (2010) The National DNA Database 2009–10. London: Stationery Office.
27.
Human Genetics Commission (2008) A Citizens Inquiry into the Forensic Use of DNA. London: Human Genetics Commission.
28.
Human Genetics Commission (2009) Nothing to Hide, Nothing to Fear? Balancing Individual Rights and the Public Interest in the Governance and Use of the National DNA Database. London: Human Genetics Commission.
29.
InnesMClarkA (2009) Policing the past: Cold case studies, forensic evidence and retroactive social control. British Journal of Sociology60(3): 543–63.
30.
KerrACunningham-BurleySTuttonR (2007) Shifting subject positions: Experts and lay people in public dialogue. Social Studies of Science37(3): 385–411.
31.
KoenigBALeeSSJRichardsonSS (eds) (2008) Revisiting Race in a Genomic Age. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
32.
LazerD (2004) DNA and the Criminal Justice System. London: MIT Press.
33.
M’charekA (2008) Silent witness, articulate collective: DNA evidence and the inference of visible traits. Bioethics22(9): 519–28.
34.
M’charekAToomVPrainsackB (2012) Bracketing off population does not advance ethical reflection on EVCs: A reply to Kayser and Schneider. Forensic Science International: Genetics6(1): e16–e17.
35.
MacphersonW (1999) The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry: A Report of an Inquiry by Sir William Macpherson of Cluny. London: Stationery Office.
36.
McCartneyC (2006) The DNA expansion programme and criminal investigations. British Journal of Criminology46(2): 175–92.
37.
McCartneyCWilliamsRWilsonT (2010) The Future of Forensic Bioinformation. London: Nuffield Foundation.
38.
McCartneyCWilliamsRWilsonT (2011) Transnational exchange of forensic DNA: Viability, legitimacy, and acceptability. European Journal of Criminal Justice Research and Policy17(4): 305–22.
39.
MansfieldB (2012) Race and the new epigenetic biopolitics of environmental health. BioSocieties7(4): 352–72.
40.
National DNA Database Ethics Group (2009) Second Annual Report. London: National DNA Database Ethics Group.
41.
National DNA Database Ethics Group (2010) Third Annual Report. London: National DNA Database Ethics Group.
42.
NelsonA (2008) Bio science: Genetic genealogy testing and the pursuit of African ancestry. Social Studies of Science38(5): 759–83.
43.
NPIA (2007a) National DNA Database (NDNAD): Equality Impact Assessment: Stage One. London: National Policing Improvement Agency.
44.
NPIA (2007b) ACPO: DNA Good Practice Manual Equality Impact Assessment: Stage One. London: National Policing Improvement Agency.
45.
NPIA (2009a) National DNA Database (NDNAD): Equality Impact Template: Stage Two. London: National Policing Improvement Agency.
46.
NPIA (2009b) National DNA Database (NDNAD): Full Equality Impact Assessment: Stage Two. London: National Policing Improvement Agency.
NPIA (2012b) NPIA Business Plan April 2011–March 2012. London: National Policing Improvement Agency.
49.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2007) The Forensic Use of Bioinformation: Ethical Issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
50.
PrainsackB (2010) Partners in crime: The use of forensic DNA technologies in Austria. In: HindmarshRPrainsackB (eds) Genetic Suspects: Global Governance of Forensic DNA Profiling and Databasing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 153–74.
51.
RamanSTuttonR (2010) Life, science, and biopower. Science, Technology & Human Values35(5): 711–34.
52.
RandersonJ (2006) DNA of 37% of black men held by the police. The Guardian, 5January.
53.
ReardonJ (2012) The democratic, anti-racist genome? Technoscience at the limits of liberalism. Science as Culture21(1): 25–47.
54.
ReubiD (2012) The human capacity to reflect and decide: Bioethics and the reconfiguration of the research subject in the British biomedical sciences. Social Studies of Science42(3): 348–68.
55.
RobertsD (2011) Collateral consequences, genetic surveillance, and the new biopolitics of race. Howard Law Journal54: 567–86.
56.
RobertsP (1996) What price a free market in forensic science services? The organization and regulation of science in the criminal process. British Journal of Criminology36(1): 37–60.
57.
RoweM (2012) Race & Crime. London: Sage.
58.
SalterBJonesM (2005) Biobanks and bioethics: The politics of legitimation. Journal of European Public Policy12(4): 710–32.
59.
SalterBSalterC (2007) Bioethics and the global moral economy: The cultural politics of human embryonic stem cell science. Science, Technology & Human Values32(5): 554–81.
60.
SchrammKSkinnerDRottenburgR (eds) (2012) Identity Politics and the New Genetics: Re/Creating Categories of Difference and Belonging. Oxford: Berghahn.
61.
Secretary of State for Justice (2007) The Government’s Response to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee Report: Young Black People and the Criminal Justice System. London: Stationery Office.
62.
SkinnerD (2006) Racialised futures: Biologism and the changing politics of identity. Social Studies of Science36(3): 459–88.
63.
SkinnerD (2012) Mobile identities and fixed categories: Forensic DNA and the politics of racialized data. In: SchrammKSkinnerDRottenburgR (eds) Identity Politics and the New Genetics: Re/Creating Categories of Difference and Belonging. Oxford: Berghahn, 53–78.
64.
SmartATuttonRMartinPEllisonGAshcroftR (2008) The standardization of race and ethnicity in biomedical science editorials and UK biobanks. Social Studies of Science38(3): 407–23.
65.
StackhouseRAndersonCShawAIredaleR (2010) Avoiding the ‘usual suspects’: Young people’s views of the National DNA Database. New Genetics and Society29(2): 149–66.
66.
SveinssonKP (ed.) (2010) Ethnic Profiling the Use of ‘Race’ in UK Law Enforcement. London: Runnymede Trust.
67.
ToomV (2010) Producing suspects. The politics of the National DNA Database of England and Wales. Science as Culture19(3): 387–91.
68.
TuttonR (2008) Biobanks and the biopolitics of inclusion and representation. In: GottweisHPetersenA (eds) Biobanks: Governance in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
69.
TuttonRLevittM (2010) Health and wealth, law and order: Banking DNA against disease and crime. In: HindmarshRPrainsackB (eds) Genetic Suspects: Global Governance of Forensic DNA Profiling and Databasing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 85–104.
70.
WhitmarshIJonesDS (eds) (2010) What is the Use of Race? Modern Governance and the Biology of Difference. London: MIT Press.
71.
WilliamsR (2010) DNA databases and the forensic imaginary. In: HindmarshRPrainsackB (eds) Genetic Suspects: Global Governance of Forensic DNA Profiling and Databasing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 131–52.
72.
WilliamsRJohnsonP (2008) Genetic Policing: The Use of DNA in Criminal Investigations. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
73.
WilsonD (2011) Creating the ‘ethics industry’: Mary Warnock, in vitro fertilization and the history of bioethics in Britain. BioSocieties6(2): 121–41.
74.
Wilson-KovacsDWyattDHauskellerC (2012) ‘A Faustian bargain?’ Public voices on forensic DNA technologies and the National DNA Database. New Genetics and Society31(3): 285–98.
