What One Sees and How One Files Seeing: Human Rights Reporting,Representation and Action 1

Abstract

This article argues that the forms through which violence and atrocity are expressed – legal, statistical and testimonial – are important objects of analysis because credo is manifest in form, and an examination of form reveals something about the relationship between the ‘world view’ of human rights organizations and the ‘styles of thought’ that shape and inform their representations. The article considers what the discursive forms that seem indigenous to human rights and human rights advocacy both express (legalism, scientism) and repress (historicism), and discusses ways in which these forms of representation potentially facilitate and inhibit action.

Keywords

human rights activism human rights reports ideology knowledge

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amnesty International (AI) (2009a) About Amnesty International. Available at: http://www.amnesty.org/en/who-we-are/about-amnesty-international (accessed 4 December 2009).

Amnesty International (AI) (2009b) Frequently asked questions. Available at: http://www.amnesty.org/en/who-we-are/faq (accessed 4 December 2009).

Amnesty International (AI) (2009c) Who is AI? Available at: http://www.amnesty.org/en/who-we-are (accessed 4 December 2009).

Brysk

(1994) The politics of measurement: The contested count of the disappeared in Argentina. Human Rights Quarterly 16(4): 676–92.

Castro-Gómez

(2007) The missing chapter of empire: Postmodern re-organization of coloniality and post-Fordist capitalism. Cultural Studies 21(2–3): 428–48.

Claude

Thomas

(1986) Editor’s introduction. Human Rights Quarterly 8/4: 551–66.

Cmiel

(2004) The recent history of human rights. American Historical Review 109(1): 117–36.

Cohen

(1996) Government responses to human rights reports: Claims, denials and counterclaims. Human Rights Quarterly 18(3): 516–43.

Cohen

(2001) States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge: Polity.

10.

Cohen

Seu

(2002) Knowing enough not to feel too much: Emotional thinking about human rights appeals. In: Bradley

Petro

(eds) Truth Claims: Representation and Human Rights. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 187–201.

11.

De Neufville

(1986) Human rights reporting as a policy tool: An examination of the State Department Country Reports. Human Rights Quarterly 8/4: 681–99.

12.

Dudai

(2009) ‘Can you describe this?’ Human rights reports and what they tell us about the human rights movement. In: Wilson

Brown

(eds) Humanitarianism and Suffering: The Mobilization of Empathy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 245–64.

13.

Eagleton

(2009) Darwin won’t help. London Review of Books 31(18): 20–2.

14.

Elias

(1986) The Politics of Victimization: Victims, Victimology and Human Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.

15.

Foucault

(1991) Truth and power. In: Rabinow

(ed.) The Foucault Reader. London: Penguin, 51–75.

16.

Hacking

(1999) The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

17.

Human Rights Watch (HRW) (2008a) Who we are. Available at: http://www.hrw.org/en/node/75136 (accessed 4 December 2009).

18.

Human Rights Watch (HRW) (2008b) Our research methodology. Available at: http://www.hrw.org/en/node/75141 (accessed 4 December 2009).

19.

Human Rights Watch (HRW) (2008c) About us. Available at: http://www.hrw.org/en/about (accessed 4 December 2009).

20.

Ignatieff

(1996) Articles of faith. Index on Censorship 5: 110–22.

21.

Illouz

(2007) Cold Intimacies. Cambridge: Polity.

22.

Jameson

(2002[1981]) The Political Unconscious. London: Routledge.

23.

Kleinman

(1997) The appeal of experience; The dismay of images: Cultural appropriations of suffering in our times. In: Kleinman

Das

(eds) Social Suffering. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1–24.

24.

Koskeniemmi

(1989) From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Helsinki: Finnish Lawyers Publishing Company.

25.

Lemaitre

(2007) Legal fetishism at home and abroad. Unbound: Harvard Journal of the Legal Left 3(6): 6–18.

26.

Lund-London (2009) Guidelines, also known as Raoul Wallenberg Institute of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law and International Bar Association Guidelines on International Human Rights Fact-Finding Visits and Reports. Available at: http://www.factfindingguidelines.org/index.html (accessed 4 December 2009).

27.

McClennen

Slaughter

(2009) Introducing human rights and literary forms; Or, the vehicles and vocabularies of human rights. Comparative Literature Studies 46/1: 1–19.

28.

Mamdani

(1998) A diminished truth. Siyaya 3: 38–40.

29.

Mamdani

(2009) Saviors and Survivors: Darfur, Politics and the War on Terror. London: Verso.

30.

Mannheim

(1991[1936]) Ideology and Utopia. London: Routledge.

31.

Moon

(2008) Narrating Political Reconciliation: South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission Maryland: Lexington Books/Rowman and Littlefield.

32.

Moon

(2009) Healing past violence: Traumatic assumptions and therapeutic interventions in war and reconciliation. Journal of Human Rights 8(1): 71–91.

33.

Orentlicher

(1990) Bearing witness: The art and science of human rights fact-finding. Harvard Human Rights Journal 3: 83–135.

34.

Poovey

(1998) A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

35.

Public Committee Against Torture in Israel (PCATI) (2009) About PCATI. Available at: http://www.stoptorture.org.il/en/odot (accessed 9 December 2009).

36.

Pupavac

(2004) War on the couch: The emotionology of the New International Security Paradigm. European Journal of Social Theory 7(2): 149–70.

37.

Rieff

(1966) The Triumph of the Therapeutic: Uses of Faith after Freud. London: Chatto and Windus.

38.

Ross

(2003) On having voice and being heard: Some after-effects of testifying before the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Anthropological Theory 3(3): 325–41.

39.

Scarry

(1985) The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. New York: Oxford University Press.

40.

Seu

(2003) Your stomach makes you feel that you don’t want to know anything about it: Desensitization, defence mechanisms and rhetoric in response to human rights abuses. Journal of Human Rights 2(2): 183–96.

41.

Sontag

(2003) Regarding the Pain of Others. London: Penguin.

42.

Weber

(1978[1956]) Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

43.

Wilson

(1997) Representing human rights violations: Social contexts and subjectivities. In: Wilson

(ed.) Human Rights, Culture and Context: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Pluto Press, 134–60.

44.

Winch

(2008[1958]) The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge.