BobbioN (1996[1968]) The Age of Rights. Cambridge: Polity.
3.
BosniakL (2006) The Citizen and the Alien. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
BourdieuP (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BryskAShafirG (eds) (2004) People out of Place: Globalization, Human Rights and the Citizenship Gap. New York: Routledge.
6.
De GenovaN (2002) Migrant ‘illegality’ and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology31: 419–47.
7.
HoffmanSL (2011) Introduction: Genealogies of human rights. In: HoffmanSL (ed.) Human Rights in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–26.
8.
IgnatieffM (2001) Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
LevyDSznaiderN (2006) The transformation of sovereignty: Towards a sociology of human rights. British Journal of Sociology57(4): 657–76.
10.
LockwoodD (1996) Civic integration and class formation. British Journal of Sociology47(3): 531–50.
11.
LuibhéidE (2002) Entry Denied: Controlling Sexuality at the Border. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
12.
MarshallTH (1950) Citizenship and Social Class and other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
SassenS (2002) The repositioning of citizenship: Emergent subjects and spaces for politics. Berkeley Journal of Sociology46: 4–24.
14.
ShacharA (2009) The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Global Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
SigonaN (2012) ‘I’ve too much baggage’: The impact of legal status on the social worlds of irregular migrants. Social Anthropology20(1): 50–65.
16.
SoysalY (1994) Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
TurnerB (1993) Outline of a theory of human rights. Sociology27: 485–512.
18.
US State Department (2000) 1999 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices. Washington, DC: Department of State.
19.
WatersM (1996) Human rights and the universalisation of interests: Towards a social constructionist approach. Sociology30(3): 593–600.