Drawing on Durkheim, Simmel, and Luhmann, this article grounds the polysemic character of privacy and its contingent legal determination in the functional differentiation of social communication systems. It demonstrates a previously overlooked common denominator among privacy conflicts and an emergent principle for their legal resolution. Case-law examples from the US Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights show how functional relevance turns ‘private’ events into ‘public’ ones, or ‘reasonable limitations’ of privacy into ‘unwarranted violations’, and vice versa.
BeckUGiddensALashS (1994) Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
BignamiF (2007) European versus American liberty: A comparative privacy analysis of antiterrorism data mining. Boston College Law Review48(3): 609–98.
5.
BlousteinEJ (1964) Privacy as an aspect of human dignity: An answer to Dean Prosser. New York University Law Review39: 962–1007.
6.
BostwickGL (1976) A taxonomy of privacy: Repose, sanctuary, and intimate decision. California Law Review64(6): 1447–83.
7.
BuxtonR (2009) Private life and the English judges. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies29(3): 413–25.
8.
CloudM (1996) The Fourth Amendment during the Lochner era: Privacy, property, and liberty in constitutional theory. Stanford Law Review48(3): 555–631.
9.
DurkheimE (1973[1898]) Individualism and intellectuals. In: BellahRN (ed.) Emile Durkheim on Morality and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 43–57.
10.
DurkheimE (1982[1901]) The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: The Free Press.
11.
EliasN (2000[1939]) The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
12.
EtzioniA (1999) The Limits of Privacy. New York: Basic Books.
13.
FriedC (1968) Privacy. Yale Law Journal77: 475–93.
14.
FriedmanLM (2007) Guarding Life’s Dark Secrets: Legal and Social Control over Reputation, Propriety, and Privacy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
16.
GavisonR (1980) Privacy and the limits of law. Yale Law Journal89: 421–71.
17.
GreeneJ (2010) The so-called right to privacy. UC Davis Law Review43: 715–47.
18.
Harvard Law Review (1981) The right to privacy in nineteenth century America. Harvard Law Review94(8): 1892–910.
19.
HenkinL (1974) Privacy and autonomy. Columbia Law Review74(8): 1410–33.
20.
JamesonF (1991) Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso.
21.
LaneFS (2009) American Privacy: The 400-Year History of Our Most Contested Right. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
22.
LevineDN (1971) Introduction. In: LevinDN (ed.) Georg Simmel: On Individuality and Social Forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, ix–lxv.
23.
LuhmannN (1982) Differentiation of Society. New York: Columbia University Press.
24.
LuhmannN (1985) A Sociological Theory of Law. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
25.
LuhmannN (1987) The representation of society within society. Current Sociology35(2): 101–8.
26.
LuhmannN (1990) Essays on Self-reference. New York: Columbia University Press.
27.
LuhmannN (1992) Operational closure and structural coupling: The differentiation of the legal system. Cardozo Law Review13: 1419–41.
28.
LuhmannN (2004) Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
LyotardJF (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
30.
MarkesinisBO’CinneideCFedtkeJHunter-HeninM (2004) Concerns and ideas about the developing English law of privacy. American Journal of Comparative Law52(1): 133–208.
31.
MillsCW (1963) Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. In: HorowitzIL (ed.) Power, Politics, People: The Collected Essays of C Wright Mills. New York: Ballantine Books, 439–52.
32.
MoellerHG (2006) Luhmann Explained: From Souls to Systems. Chicago: Open Court.
33.
MurphyRF (1984) Social distance and the veil. In: SchoemanFD (ed.) Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
NoblesRSchiffD (2006) A Sociology of Jurisprudence. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
35.
PhillipsonG (2003) Transforming breach of confidence? Towards a common law right of privacy under the Human Rights Act. Modern Law Review66(5): 726–58.
36.
PosnerRA (2008) Privacy, surveillance, and law. University of Chicago Law Review75(1): 245–60.
37.
PostRC (1989) The social foundations of privacy: Community and self in the common law tort. California Law Review77(5): 957–1010.
38.
PostRC (2001) Three concepts of privacy. Georgetown Law Journal89: 2087–98.
39.
Privacy International (2010) European Privacy and Human Rights Report. Electronic Privacy Information Center, and the Center for Media and Communications Studies. Available at: https://www.privacyinternational.org/ephr
40.
ProsserWL (1960) Privacy. California Law Review48(3): 383–423.
41.
RosenJ (2000) The Unwanted Gaze: The Destruction of Privacy in America. New York: Random House.
42.
SamuelsonP (2000) Privacy as intellectual property?Stanford Law Review52: 1125–73.
43.
SchoemanFD (1992) Privacy and Social Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
SchwartzB (1968) The social psychology of privacy. American Journal of Sociology73(6): 741–52.
45.
SiegelRB (1996) ‘The rule of love’: Wife beating as prerogative and privacy. Yale Law Journal105: 2117–207.
46.
SimmelG (1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel. WolffKH (ed.) New York: The Free Press
47.
SimmelG (1955[1922]) Conflict and the Web of Group-Affiliations. New York: The Free Press.
48.
SimmelG (1971[1908]) How is society possible? In: LevineDN (ed.) Georg Simmel: On Individuality and Social Forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
SoloveDJ (2009) Understanding Privacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
StrahilevitzLJ (2005) A social networks theory of privacy. University of Chicago Law Review72(3): 919–88.
51.
ThornhillC (2011) A Sociology of Constitutions: Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
VerschraegenG (2002) Human rights and modern society: A sociological analysis from the perspective of systems theory. Journal of Law and Society29(2): 258–81.
53.
WarrenSDBrandeisLD (1890) The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review4(5): 193–220.
54.
WestinAF (1967) Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum.
55.
WhitmanJQ (2004) The two western cultures of privacy: Dignity versus liberty. Yale Law Journal113: 1151–221.
