This article explores the role of ‘critical mass’ and social networks in the generation of collective action. Drawing on qualitative and quantitative (social network) data, the article argues that both are pivotal in the process whereby collective action takes shape. The empirical focus of the article is student politics but it is argued that the mechanisms and dynamics identified have a much wider domain of application.
CrossleyN (2011) Towards Relational Sociology. London: Routledge.
14.
DianiMMcAdamD (2003) Social Movements and Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
EdwardsGCrossleyN (2009) Measures and meanings. Methodological Innovations On-Line3(2). Available at: http://www.pbs.plym.ac.uk/mi/
16.
EmirbayerMGoodwinJ (1994) Network analysis, culture and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology99: 1411–54.
17.
FeldS (1981) The focused organisation of social ties. American Journal of Sociology86: 1015–35.
18.
GoffmanE (1971) Relations in Public. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
19.
GoffmanE (1974) Frame Analysis. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
20.
GouldR (1991) Multiple networks and mobilisation in the Paris Commune 1871. American Sociological Review56: 716–29.
21.
GouldR (1993) Collective action and network structure. American Sociological Review58(2): 182–96.
22.
IbrahimY (2010) Between revolution and defeat. Sociology Compass4(7): 495–504.
23.
KimHBearmanP (1997) The structure and dynamics of movement participation. American Sociological Review62(1): 70–93.
24.
KittsJ (2000) Mobilizing in black boxes. Mobilization5(2): 241–58.
25.
McAdamD (1982) Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
26.
McAdamD (1986) Recruitment to high risk activism. American Journal of Sociology92(1): 64–90.
27.
MarshA (1977) Protest and Political Consciousness. London: Sage.
28.
MarwellGOliverPPrahlR (1988) Social networks and collective action: A theory of critical mass III. American Journal of Sociology94: 502–34.
29.
MilroyL (1987) Language and Social Networks. Blackwell: Oxford.
30.
MischeA (2003) Cross-talk in movements. In: DianiMMcAdamD (2003) Social Movements and Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
OliverPMarwellG (1988) The paradox of group size in collective action: A theory of critical mass II. American Sociological Review53: 1–8.
32.
OliverPMarwellG (1993) The Critical Mass in Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
OliverPMarwellGTeixeiraR (1985) A theory of critical mass I. American Journal of Sociology91: 522–56.
34.
PassyF (2001) Socialisation, connection and the structure/agency gap. Mobilization6(2): 173–92.
35.
SchellingT (1995) Micromotives and Macrobehaviours. New York: Norton.
36.
ScottJ (2000) Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage.
37.
SimmelG (1955) Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. New York: Free Press.
38.
SmelserN (1968) Essays in Social Explanation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39.
SnowDZurcherLEkland-OlsonS (1980) Social networks and social movements. American Sociological Review45(5): 787–801.
40.
SnowDRochfordEWordenSBenfordR (1986) Frame alignment processes, micromobilisation and movement participation. American Sociological Review51(4): 464–81.
41.
TillyC (1978) From Mobilisation to Revolution. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
42.
TillyC (2004) Social Movements 1768–2004. New York: Paradigm.
43.
WassermanSFaustK (1994) Social Network Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.