Olympic analyses typically depend heavily on perspectives built from macro processes characteristically rooted in political economy. Using survey data of city residents gathered at six different points in time during the Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympics, this article proposes a focus on what happens within the host city during the Games. While the Olympics were the centre of much debate and controversy before the Games, the data show that attitudes towards the Games became much more favorable thereby providing hard evidence that the Olympics had an experiential urban impact. Regression models revealed that attending free unticketed events and supporting the Liberal party in the last provincial election were the best predictors of positive attitudes towards the Games. It is concluded that the Olympics represent a form of public policy which generates responses related to socio-political factors while also being an interactional event transforming local attitudes towards the Games.
AndranovichGBurbankMJHeyingCH (2001) Olympic cities: Lessons learned from mega-event politics. Journal of Urban Affairs23(2): 113–31.
2.
BanajiMRHeiphetzL (2010) Attitudes. In: FiskeSTGilbertDTLindzeyGHandbook of Social Psychology, 5th edn, Vol. 1. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 353–393.
3.
BlackD (2007) The symbolic politics of sport mega-events: 2010 in comparative perspective. Politikon34(3): 261–76.
4.
BroudehouxA (2007) Spectacular Beijing: The conspicuous construction of an Olympic metropolis. Journal of Urban Affairs29(4): 383–99.
5.
CochraneAPeckJTickellA (1996) Manchester plays games: Exploring the local politics of globalisation. Urban Studies33(8): 1319–36.
6.
DeccioCBalogluS (2002) Nonhost community resident reactions to the 2002 Winter Olympics: The spillover impacts. Journal of Travel Research41(1): 46–56.
7.
EisingerP (2000) The politics of bread and circuses: Building the city for the visitor class. Urban Affairs Review35(3): 316–33.
8.
EsaissonPGranbergD (1996) Attitudes towards a fallen leader: Evaluations of Olaf Palme before and after the assassination. British Journal of Political Science26(3): 429–439.
9.
EssexSChalkleyB (2004) Mega-sporting events in urban and regional policy: A history of the Winter Olympics. Planning Perspectives19(2): 201–32.
10.
FosterM (1976) Colorado’s defeat of the 1976 Winter Olympics. Colorado Magazine53: 163–86.
11.
GoldJGoldM (2008) Olympic cities: Regeneration, city branding, and changing urban agendas. Geography Compass2(1): 300–18.
12.
GothamD (2005) Theorizing urban spectacles: Festivals, tourism, and the transformation of urban space. City9(2): 225–46.
13.
GualaC (2009) To bid or not to bid: Public opinion before and after the Games: The case of Turin. In: KennellJBladonCBoothE (eds) The Olympic Legacy: People, Place, Enterprise. London: University of Greenwich, 21–30.
14.
HarveyD (1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. London: Blackwell.
15.
HillerH (1990) The urban transformation of a landmark event: The 1988 Calgary Winter Olympics. Urban Affairs Quarterly26(1): 118–137.
16.
LenskyjH (1996) When winners are losers: Toronto and Sydney bids for the Summer Olympics. Journal of Sport and Social Issues20(4): 392–410.
17.
LenskyjH (2008) Inside the Olympic Industry: Challenging Olympic Power and Propaganda. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
18.
LongJS (1997) Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
LongJSFreeseJ (2006) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
20.
MacAloonJJ (1984) Rite, Drama, Festival, Spectacle: Rehearsals toward a Theory of Cultural Performance. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
21.
MacAloonJJ (2006) The theory of spectacle: Reviewing Olympic ethnography. In: TomlinsonAYoungC (eds) National Identity and Global Sports Events. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 15–39.
22.
MacKeunMBrownC (1987) Political context and attitude change. American Political Science Review81(2): 471–90.
23.
MacruryIPoynterG (2008) The regeneration Games: Commodities, gifts, and the economies of London 2012. International Journal of the History of Sport25(14): 2072–90.
24.
MihalikB (2001) Host population perceptions of the 1996 Atlanta Olympics: Attendance, support, benefits and liabilities. Tourism Analysis5(1): 49–53.
25.
MihalikB (2003) Host population perceptions towards the 1996 Atlanta Olympics: Benefits and liabilities. In: De MoragasMKennettCPuigN (eds) The Legacy of the Olympic Games 1984–2000. Lausanne: International Olympic Committee, 349–5.
26.
PreussHSolbergH (2006) Attracting major sporting events: The role of local residents. European Sport Management Quarterly6(4): 391–411.
27.
RafteryAE (1995) Baysian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology25: 111–63.
28.
RitchieJRBLyonsMM (1990) Olympulse VI: A post-event assessment of resident reaction to the XVth Olympic Winter Games. Journal of Travel Research28(3): 14–23.
29.
RocheM (1992) Mega-events and micro-modernisation: On the sociology of the new urban tourism. British Journal of Sociology43(4): 563–600.
30.
RocheM (2000) Mega-Events and Modernity: Olympics and Expos in the Growth of Global Culture. London: Routledge.
31.
RoweDStevensonD (2006) Sociality and spatiality in global media events. In: TomlinsonAYoungC (eds) National Identity and Global Sports Events. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 197–214.
32.
RutheiserC (1997) Making place in the non-place urban realm: Notes on the revitalization of Downtown Atlanta. Urban Anthropology26(1): 9–42.
33.
ScamuzziS (2006) Winter Olympic Games 200) in Turin: The rising weight of public opinion. In: MullerNMessingMPreussH (eds) From Chamonix to Turin: The Winter Games in the Scope of Olympic Research. Kassel: Olympische Studien, Agon, 343–57.
34.
ShawC (2008) Five Ring Circus: Myths and Realities of the Olympic Games. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society.
35.
ShortJ (2008) Globalization: Cities and the Summer Olympics. City12(3): 321–40.
36.
SkocpolT (2002) Will 9/11 and the War on Terror revitalize American democracy?Political Science and Politics35(3): 537–40.
37.
SurborgBVanWynsbergheRWylyE (2008) Mapping the Olympic growth machine: Transnational urbanism and the growth machine diaspora. City12(3): 341–55.
38.
TomlinsonA (2005) The commercialization of the Olympics: Cities, corporations and the Olympic commodity. In: YoungKWamsleyK (eds) Global Olympics: Historical and Sociological Studies of the Modern Games. London: Elsevier, 179–200.
39.
WhitsonDMacintoshD (1996) The global circus: International sport, tourism, and the marketing of cities. Journal of Sport and Social Issues20(3): 278–95.
