In line with a long sociological tradition, Niklas Luhmann has analysed the basic characteristics of modern society in terms of social differentiation. Luhmann has focused on the forms of differentiation, and argued that modern society is differentiated according to subsystems that concentrate on one function (e.g. the economy, law, science, politics, education). In the first part of the article, I explore the backgrounds of this systems-theoretical framework. In the second part, this framework is used to analyse the structural characteristics of the educational system. This system has its basis in the school’s complexes of interaction and organization. But education is also confronted with the consequences of its own autonomy, its own mode of operating. It is suggested that these secondary effects have more impact on the evolution of this system than its societal environment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, J. (1990) ‘Differentiation Theory: Problems and Prospects’, in J.C. Alexander and P. Colomy (eds) Differentiation Theory and Social Change, pp. 1–15. New York: Columbia University Press .
2.
Archer, M.S. (1979) Social Origins of Educational Systems. London: Sage .
3.
Archer, M.S. (1982) ‘Introduction’, in M.S. Archer (ed.) The Sociology of Educational Expansion, pp. 3–64. London: Sage .
4.
Ashby, W.R. (1964) An Introduction to Cybernetics. London: Chapman and Hall .
5.
Baecker, D. (2001) ‘Why Systems?’ , Theory, Culture and Society18: 59–74 .
6.
Bateson, G. (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine .
7.
Beck, U. (1986) Risikogesellschaft. Frankfurt A.M.: Suhrkamp.
8.
Bidwell, C.E., K.A. Frank and P.A. Quiroz (1997) ‘Teacher Types, Workplace Controls, and the Organization of Schools’ , Sociology of Education70: 285–307 .
9.
Blühdorn, I. (2000) ‘An Offer One Might Prefer to Refuse: The Systems Theoretical Legacy of Niklas Luhmann’ , European Journal of Social Theory3: 339–354 .
10.
Brehony, K.J. (2002) ‘Researching the Grammar of Schooling: An Historical View’ , European Educational Research Journal1: 178–189 .
11.
Broadfoot, P.M. (1996) Education, Assessment and Society. Buckingham: Open University Press .
12.
Buckley, W. (1967) Sociology and Modern Systems Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
13.
Chervel, A. (1998) La Culture Scolaire. Paris: Belin .
14.
Collins, R. (1979) The Credential Society. New York: Academic Press .
15.
Collins, R. (2000) ‘Comparative and Historical Patterns of Education’, in M.T. Hallinan (ed.) Handbook of the Sociology of Education, pp. 213–239. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum .
16.
Comenius, J.A. (1967[1638]) The Great Didactic. New York: Russell and Russell .
17.
Crooks, T. (1988) ‘The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students’ , Review of Educational Research58: 438–481 .
18.
De Crousaz, J.P. (1722) TraitÈ de l’Èducation des enfans. La Haye: Vaillant et Prevost.
19.
Delamont, S. (2000) ‘The Anomalous Beasts: Hooligans and the Sociology of Education’ , Sociology34: 95–111 .
20.
De Mirabeau, H.G. de R. (1791) Discours sur L’Èducation Nationale. Paris: Lejay.
21.
Depaepe, M. (2000) Order in Progress: Everyday Educational Practice in Primary Schools – Belgium, 1880–1970. Leuven: Leuven University Press .
22.
Diderot, D. (1875[1776]) ‘Plan d’une UniversitÈ pour le Gouvernement de Russie’, in Oeuvres ComplËtes, pp. 409–534. Paris: Garnier.
23.
Durkheim, E. (1956) Education and Sociology. Glencoe: Free Press .
24.
Filer, A. and A. Pollard (2000) The Social World of Pupil Assessment. London: Continuum Books .
25.
Gamoran, A., W.G. Secada and C.B. Marrett (2000) ‘The Organizational Context of Teaching and Learning’, in M.T. Hallinan (ed.) Handbook of the Sociology of Education, pp. 37–63. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum .
26.
Goffman, E. (1966) Interaction Ritual. New York: Doubleday Anchor .
27.
Hammersley, M. (1996) ‘Post Mortem or Post Modern? Some Reflections on British Sociology of Education’ , British Journal of Educational Studies44: 395–407 .
28.
Hughes, E. (1971) The Sociological Eye. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton .
29.
Jackson, P.W. (1990) Life in Classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press .
30.
King, M. and C. Thornhill (2003) ‘Will the Real Niklas Luhmann Stand Up, Please. A Reply to John Mingers’ , The Sociological Review51: 276–285 .
31.
Kuhn, A. (1974) The Logic of Social Systems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
32.
Locke, J. (1902[1693]) Some Thoughts Concerning Education. Cambridge: University Press .
33.
Lortie, D.C. (1977) Schoolteacher. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
34.
Luhmann, N. (1977) ‘Differentiation of Society’ , Canadian Journal of Sociology2: 29–53 .
35.
Luhmann, N. (1981) Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik, Band 2. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
36.
Luhmann, N. (1984) Soziale Systeme. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
37.
Luhmann, N. (1989) Ecological Communication. Cambridge: Polity Press .
38.
Luhmann, N. (1995) Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
39.
Luhmann, N. (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
40.
Luhmann, N. (1998) Observations on Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
41.
Luhmann, N. (2002) Das Erziehungssystem der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
42.
Luhmann, N. and K.E. Schorr (1979) Reflexionsprobleme im Erziehungssystem. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
43.
Luhmann, N. and K.E. Schorr (2000) Problems of Reflection in the System of Education. Münster: Waxmann .
44.
Maclure, M. and B.M. Walker (2000) ‘Disenchanted Evenings: The Social Organization of Talk in Parent-teacher Consultations in UK Secondary Schools’ , British Journal of Sociology of Education21: 5–25 .
45.
Mangan, J.A. (ed.) (1994) A Significant Social Revolution. Cross-Cultural Aspects of the Evolution of Compulsory Education. London: Woburn .
46.
Margolis, E. (ed.) (2001) The Hidden Curriculum in Higher Education. New York: Routledge .
47.
Maturana, H.R. (1981) ‘Autopoiesis’, in M. Zeleny (ed.) Autopoiesis, pp. 21–33. New York: North Holland .
48.
Maturana, H.R. and F.J. Varela (1980) Autopoiesis and Cognition. Dordrecht: Reidel .
49.
Maturana, H.R. and F.J. Varela (1988) The Tree of Knowledge. Boston: New Science Library .
50.
Mingers, J. (1995) Self-Producing Systems. New York: Plenum .
51.
Mingers, J. (2002) ‘Can Social Systems be Autopoietic? Assessing Luhmann’s Social Theory’ , The Sociological Review50: 278–299 .
52.
Orton, J.D. and K.E. Weick (1990) ‘Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization’ , Academy of Management Review15: 203–223 .
53.
Parra-Luna, F. (2000) ‘A Model for Measuring the Performance of Social Systems’, in F. Parra-Luna (ed.) The Performance of Social Systems, pp. 89–117. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum .
54.
Parsons, T. and G.M. Platt (1974) The American University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
55.
Paterson, F.N.S. (1988) ‘Schooling the Family’ , Sociology22: 65–86 .
Scott, W.R. (1992) Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall .
58.
Shain, F. and J. Ozga (2001) ‘Identity Crisis? Problems and Issues in the Sociology of Education’ , British Journal of Sociology of Education22: 109–120 .
59.
Shannon, C.E. and W. Weaver (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press .
60.
Shilling, C. (1993) ‘The Demise of the Sociology of Education in Britain?’ , British Journal of Sociology of Education14: 105–121 .
61.
Smelser, N.J. (1990) ‘The Contest between Family and Schooling in Nineteenthcentury Britain’, in J.C. Alexander and P. Colomy (eds.) Differentiation Theory and Social Change, pp. 165–186. New York: Columbia University Press .
62.
Stichweh, R. (1991) Der frühmoderne Staat und die europ‰ische Universit‰t. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
63.
Vanderstraeten, R. (1997) ‘Circularity, Complexity and Educational Policy Planning. A Systems Approach to the Planning of School Provision’ , Oxford Review of Education23: 321–332 .
64.
Vanderstraeten, R. (1999) ‘Vers‰ulung und funktionale Differenzierung. Zur Enttraditionalisierung der katholischen Lebensformen’, Soziale Welt 50: 297–314.
65.
Vanderstraeten, R. (2000a) ‘Autopoiesis and Socialization. On Luhmann’s Reconceptualization of Communication and Socialization’ , British Journal of Sociology51: 581–598 .
66.
Vanderstraeten, R. (2000b) ‘The Sociological Analysis of Educational Expansion’, in S.J. Ball (ed.) The Sociology of Education: Major Themes. Volume I, pp. 492–505. New York: Routledge .
67.
Vanderstraeten, R. (2001a) ‘The School Class as an Interaction Order’ , British Journal of Sociology of Education22: 267–277 .
68.
Vanderstraeten, R. (2001b) ‘Observing Systems: A Cybernetic Perspective on System/Environment Relations’ , Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour31: 297–311 .
69.
Vanderstraeten, R. (2002) ‘Parsons, Luhmann and the Theorem of Double Contingency’ , Journal of Classical Sociology2: 77–92 .
70.
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1988) General System Theory. New York: Braziller .
71.
Weick, K.E. (1976) ‘Educational Systems as Loosely Coupled Systems’ , Administrative Science Quarterly21: 1–19 .
