This article analyses some assumptions about human nature and subject agency apparent in two approaches to social theory: liberalism, particularly Giddens, and structuralism/poststructuralism, particularly Foucault. Feminist and Critical Theory are also drawn on. Disagreements between these approaches in relation to subject agency and structural influence are noted but an attempt is made to find complementary and common ground and to that extent to reconcile them. In so far as an integrated theoretical approach is achievable from the work of Foucault and Giddens, it is suggested that the term radical liberal best describes it. Nevertheless, this term sits more comfortably with Giddens than Foucault. I seek critical leverage on both thinkers by adopting an explicitly Freudian view of human capacities and a politically egalitarian perspective.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Althusser, L. and E. Balibar (1968) Reading Capital. London: New Left Books .
2.
Ball, S. (1992) Foucault and Education: Discipline and Knowledge. London:Routledge .
3.
Chomsky, N. (1999) The New Military Humanism: Lessons From Kosovo. London: Pluto Press .
4.
Derrida, J. (1991[1972]) ‘Difference’, in P. Kampuf (ed.) A Derrida Reader:Between the Blinds, pp. 60–67. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf .
5.
Foucault, M. (1966) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock .
6.
Foucault, M. (1990[1976]) The History of Sexuality: 1, An Introduction. London: Penguin .
7.
Foucault, M. (1990[1984]) The Care of the Self: The History of Sexuality: 3. London: Penguin .
8.
Foucault, M. (1992[1984]) The Use of Pleasure: The History of Sexuality: 2. London: Penguin .
9.
Foucault, M. (1994[1981]) ‘So is it Important to Think?’, in J.D. Faubion (ed.)Power: Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, Volume 3, pp. 454–458. London: Penguin .
10.
Foucault, M. (1994[1982]) ‘The Subject and Power’, in J.D. Faubion (ed.) Power:Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, Volume 3, pp.326–348. London: Penguin .
11.
Foucault, M. (1994[1984]) ‘Confronting Governments: Human Rights’, in J.D.Faubion (ed.) Power: Essential Works of Foucault, Volume 3, pp. 474–475. London: Penguin .
12.
Freud, S. (1991[1910 and 1927]) Two Short Accounts of Psycho-analysis. London:Penguin .
13.
Freud, S. (1991[1930]) ‘Civilization and Its Discontents’, in S. Freud Civilization, Society and Religion. London: Penguin .
14.
Gellner. E. (1992) Postmodernism, Reason and Religion. London: Routledge .
15.
Gerth, H. and C.W. Mills (eds) (1970) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul .
16.
Giddens, A. (1979)Central Problems of Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. London: Macmillan .
17.
Giddens, A. (1981) A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism: Volume 1:Power, Property and the State. London: Macmillan .
18.
Giddens, A. (1982) Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory. London: Macmillan .
19.
Giddens, A. (1984)The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity .
20.
Giddens, A. (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press .
21.
Giddens, A. (1994) Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Cambridge: Polity .
22.
Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge:Polity .
23.
Giddens, A. (2000) The Third Way and its Critics. Cambridge: Polity .
24.
Giddens, A. (ed.) (2001) The Global Third Way Debate. Cambridge: Polity
25.
Giddens, A. (2002) Where Now for New Labour? Cambridge: Polity .
26.
Hall, S. (1996) ‘Who Needs Identity’, in S. Hall and P. du Gay (eds) Questions of Cultural Identity. London: Sage .
27.
Hekman, S. (1990) ‘Hermeneutics and the Crisis of Social Theory: A Critique of Giddens’s Epistemology’, in J. Clark, C. Modgil and S. Modgil (eds) Anthony Giddens: Consensus and Controversy. London: Falmer Press .
28.
Junge, M. (2001) ‘Zygmunt Bauman’s Poisoned Gift of Morality’ , British Journal of Sociology52(1): 105–119 .
29.
Lynd, S. (1982) The Intellectual Origins of American Radicalism. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press .
30.
McNay, L. (2000) Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist and ocial Theory. Cambridge: Polity .
31.
Marcuse, H. (1968[1964]) One Dimensional Man. London: Sphere Books .
32.
Marcuse, H. (1969[1955]) Eros and Civilisation. London: Sphere Books .
33.
Mestrovic, S.J. (1998) Anthony Giddens: The Last Modernist. London: Routledge .
34.
Nash, K. (2000) ‘The “Cultural Turn”, Social Theory: Towards a Theory of Cultural Politics’ , Sociology35(1): 77–110 .
35.
O’Donnell, M. (2001) Classical and Contemporary Sociology: Theory and Issues. London: Hodder and Stoughton .
36.
Rojek, C. and B. Turner (2000) ‘Decorative Sociology: Towards a Critique of the Cultural Turn’ , Sociological Review48(4): 629–648 .
37.
Sewell, T. (1997) Black Masculinities and Schooling: How Black Boys Survive Modern Schooling. Stoke: Trentham Books .
38.
Skeggs, B. (1997)Formations of Class and Gender. London: Sage .
39.
Sokal, A. and J. Bricmont (1998) Intellectual Imposters: Postmodern Philosophers’ Abuse of Science. London: Profile Books .
40.
Smith, D. (1998) ‘Anthony Giddens and the Liberal Tradition’ , British Journal of Sociology49(4): 661–669 .
41.
Sturrock, J. (1998) The Word from Paris: Essays on Modern French Thinkers and Writers. London: Verso .
42.
Weeks, J. (1995) Invented Moralities; Sexual Values in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity .
