Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Research on the balance of welfare provision between state and market has in the past ignored gender, and more recent feminist analysis has barely explored how changing gender roles over time interact with shifts in pension policy. The loosening link between marriage and motherhood poses questions for pension systems still largely based on the male breadwinner model of pension provision for carers. This article uses data from the General Household Surveys to examine how patterns of employment and private pension disadvantage according to marital and maternal status differ between earlier and later generations of women in Britain. The private pension premium attached to never-married status among women aged over 65 is found to diminish in later generations. It is argued that cross-subsidies in state and private pension schemes in favour of married women may be less appropriate than in the past and that better means of compensating women for periods of caring can be found.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allatt, P. (1981) `Stereotyping: Familism in the Law', in B. Fryer, A. Hunt, D. Mcbarnet and B. Moorhouse (eds) Law, State and Society, Chapter 8. London: Croom Helm .

Baldwin, S. and J. Falkingham (eds) (1994) Social Security and Social Change: New Challenges to the Beveridge Model. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf .

Brannen, J. and G. Wilson (eds) (1987) Give and Take in Families. London: Allen and Unwin .

Cuvillier, R. (1979) `The Housewife: An Unjustifiable Burden on the Community' , Journal of Social Policy 8(1): 1-26 .

Daly, M. (1996) Social Security, Gender and Equality in the European Union. Brussels: EC DGV .

Dex, S. (1987) Women's Occupational Mobility: A lifetime perspective. Basingstoke: Macmillan .

Dex, S., H. Joshi and S. Macran (1996) `A Widening Gulf among British Mothers' , Oxford Review of Economic Policy 12(1): 65-75 .

Ermisch, J. and M. Francesconi (2000) `Patterns of Household and Family Formation', in R. Berthoud and J. Gershuny (eds) Seven Years in the Lives of British Families. Bristol: Policy Press .

Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) `The Household Economy', in G. Esping-Andersen Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford .

10.

Family Policy Studies Centre (2000) `New Options and New Ways of Living' , Families Today Factsheet 1: 3-4 .

11.

General Household Survey data (1994/5, 1995/6 and 1996/7). Computer files held at the Data Archive, University of Essex, Colchester.

12.

Ginn, J. and S. Arber (1991) `Gender, Class and Income Inequalities in Later Life' , British Journal of Sociology 42(3): 369-396 .

13.

Ginn, J. and S. Arber (1996) `Patterns of Employment, Pensions and Gender: The Effect of Work History on Older Women's Non-State Pensions' , Work Employment and Society 10(3): 469-490 .

14.

Ginn, J. and S. Arber (1999) `Changing Patterns of Pension Inequality: The Shift from State to Private Sources' , Ageing and Society 19(3): 319-342 .

15.

Ginn, J., D. Street and S. Arber (2001) Women, Work and Pensions: International Issues and Prospects. Buckingham: Open University Press .

16.

Glover, J. and S. Arber (1995) `Polarisation in Mothers' Employment' , Gender, Work and Organisation 2(4): 165-179 .

17.

Groves, D. (1987) `Occupational Pension Provision and Women's Poverty in Old Age', in C. Glendinning and J. Millar (eds) Women and Poverty in Britain. Brighton: Wheatsheaf .

18.

Groves, D. (1991) `Financial Provision for Women in Retirement', in M. Maclean and D. Groves (eds) Women's Issues in Social Policy. London: Routledge .

19.

Hakim, C. (1996) Key Issues in Women's Work. New Jersey: Athlone .

20.

Harkness, S. and J. Waldfogel (1999) The Family Gap in Pay: Evidence from Seven Industrialised Countries, CASE paper 30. London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion .

21.

Kiernan, K. and V. Estaugh (1993) Cohabitation: Extra-marital Childbearing and Social Policy. London: Family Policy Study Centre .

22.

Leitner, S. (2001) `Sex and Gender Discrimination within EU Pension Systems' , Journal of European Social Policy 11(2): 99-115 .

23.

Lundberg, S., R. Pollak and T. Wales (1997) `Do Husbands and Wives Pool Their Resources?' , Journal of Human Resources 32(3): 463-480 .

24.

Mann, K. (2001) Approaches to Retirement. Bristol: Policy Press .

25.

Marsh, A., R. Ford and J. Finlayson (1997) Lone Parents, Work and Benefits. London: DSS/PSI .

26.

Marsh, A., S. McKay, A. Smith and A. Stephenson (2001) Low Income Families in Britain. Work, Welfare and Social Security in 1999. DSS Research Report no. 138. London: DSS/CDS.

27.

O'Connor, S., A. Orloff and S. Shaver (1999) States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

28.

OECD (1999) Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD .

29.

ONS (1996) Living in Britain. Results from the 1996 General Household Survey. London: The Stationery Office .

30.

OPCS (1995) Results from the General Household Survey 1994. London: HMSO .

31.

Pahl, J. (1990) `Household Spending, Personal Spending and the Control of Money in Marriage' , Sociology 2(4): 119-138 .

32.

Sainsbury, S. (1996) Gender, Equality and Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

33.

Sinfield, A. (1993) `Reverse Targeting and Upside Down Benefits: How Perverse Policies Perpetuate Poverty', in A. Sinfield (ed.) Poverty, Inequality and Justice, pp. 39-48. University of Edinburgh .

34.

Ward, C., A. Dale and H. Joshi (1996) `Combining Employment with Children: An Escape from Dependence?' , Journal of Social Policy 25(2): 223-248 .

35.

Parenthood,Partnership Status and Pensions:

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References