Hammersley, M. (2003) `Analytics are no Substitute for Methodology: A Response to Speer and Hutchby,' Sociology37(2): 339-352 .
2.
Hutchby, I. (1996) `Power in Discourse: The Case of Arguments on a British Talk Radio Show' , Discourse and Society7(4): 481-497 .
3.
Hutchby, I. (1999) `Conversation Analysis and the Sociological Agenda' , Research on Language and Social Interaction32(1/2): 85-93 .
4.
Hutchby, I. (2001) `The Moral Status of Technology: Being Recorded, Being Heard and the Construction of Concerns in Child Counselling', pp. 114-132 in I. Hutchby and J. Moran-Ellis (eds) Children, Technology and Culture. London: Routledge-Falmer .
5.
Hutchby, I. and Wooffitt, R. (1998) Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity .
6.
Labov, W. (1972) Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press .
7.
Lynch, M. (2000) `Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge' , Theory, Culture and Society17(3): 26-54 .
8.
Sacks, H. (1984) `Notes on Methodology', pp. 21-27 in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
9.
Speer, S.A. (1999) `Feminism and Conversation Analysis: An Oxymoron?' , Feminism and Psychology9(4): 471-478 .
10.
Speer, S.A. (2001a) `Reconsidering the Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity: Discursive Psychology, Conversation Analysis, and Participants' Orientations' , Feminism and Psychology11(1): 107-135 .
11.
Speer, S.A. (2001b) `Participants' Orientations, Ideology, and the Ontological Status of Hegemonic Masculinity: A Rejoinder to Nigel Edley' , Feminism and Psychology11(1): 141-144 .
12.
Speer, S.A. (2002a) ` “Natural” and “Contrived” Data: A Sustainable Distinction?' , Discourse Studies4(4): 511-525 .
13.
Speer, S. A. (2002b) `What Can Conversation Analysis Contribute to Feminist Methodology? Putting Reflexivity into Practice' , Discourse and Society13(6): 783-803 .