Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

During the course of this article I employ the reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis in order to explore the normative, categorial and sequential characteristics of talk within a radio news interview. Furthermore, I explore the categorial and sequential characteristics of a particular form of adjacency and other features of the talk concerning the topic of banning fox hunting. The article explores transcribed materials as a means of illustrating how the alleged practice of providing answers that `fudge the issue' within political radio news interviews is facilitated by questions that introduce a specific moral device. Furthermore, it is argued that issues concerning accountability and the media need to be informed by studies that explore the precise characteristics of situated talk-in-interaction displayed within such settings.

Keywords

action ethnomethodology intention membership categorization analysis moral discrepancy talk-in-interaction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atkinson, M. (1984) Our Master's Voices. London: Sage.

Baker, C.D. (1984) `The Search for Adultness: Membership Work in Adolescent-Adult Talk', Human Studies 7: 301-323.

Clayman, S.C. (1992) `Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case Of News-Interview Discourse', pp. 163-198 in P. Drew and J.C. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coulthard, M. (1977) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.

Drew, P. and J.C. Heritage (eds) (1992) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eglin, P. and S. Hester (1992)'Category, Predicate and Task: The Pragmatics of Practical Action', Semiotica 8(3/4): 243-268.

Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. I: Reason and Rationalisation of Society. London: Heinemann.

Heath, C. (1986) Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Hester, S. (1994) `Les categories en contexte', Raisons Pratiques 5: 219-243.

11.

Hester, S. and P. Eglin (eds) (1997) Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorisation Analysis. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.

12.

Hester, S. and D. Francis (1994) `Doing Data: The Local Organisation of a Sociological Interview', British Journal of Sociology 45(4): 675-695.

13.

Housley, W. (1999) `Role as an Interactional Device and Resource in Multidisciplinary Team Meetings', Sociological Research Online 4: 3.

14.

Housley, W. (2000) `Category Work and Knowledgeability within Multidisciplinary Team Meetings', TEXT 20(1): 83-107.

15.

Hutchby, I. (1991) `The Organisation of Talk on Talk Radio', pp. 119-137 in P. Scannell (ed.) Broadcast Talk. London: Sage.

16.

Jayussi, L. (1991) `Values and Moral Judgement', pp. 227-251 in G. Button (ed.) Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Lynch, M. and D. Bogen (1996) The Spectacle of History. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.

18.

Maynard, D.W. (1991) `On the Interactional and Institutional Bases of Asymmetry in Clinical Discourse', American Journal of Sociology 92: 448-495.

19.

Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation, Vols. I and II, ed. G. Jefferson . Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

20.

Sacks, H. , E.A. Schegloff and G. Jefferson (1974) `A Simplest Systematics for the Organisation of Turn Taking for Conversation', Language 50: 697-735.

21.

Silverman, D. (1987) Communication and Medical Practice: Social Relations in the Clinic. London: Sage.

22.

Watson, D.R. (1978) `Categorisation, Authorisation and Blame Negotiation in Conversation', Sociology 12(1): 105-113.

23.

Watson, D.R. (1997) `Some General Reflections of Category and Sequence', pp. 49-75 in S. Hester and P. Eglin (eds) Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorisation Analysis. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.

Moral Discrepancy and `Fudging the Issue' in a Radio News Interview

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References