In recent times, under the influence of postmodernist thought sociology has largely rejected the idea of social evolution. An exception to this trend is to be found in the work of Jürgen Habermas. Habermas's account of social evolution has received some critical attention, but in sociology wider detail of the picture is not well known. Habermas wishes to hold to the possibility that evolutionary progress can be discerned not only in the sphere of technical control, but also in the sphere of social and moral development. The paper presents Habermas's views on social evoluton within the wider context of his development of critical theory as a `reconstructive science'. It suggests that his account has been able to resist many of the standard criticisms of evolutionary theory and that a renewal of interest in this area could provide a rich vein of new sociological knowledge.
Adorno, T. W. and Horkheimer, M. 1979 [1947]. Dialectic of Enlightenment. London: Verso, New Left Books.
2.
Baudrillard, J. 1994. The Illusion Of The End. Cambridge: Polity Press with Blackwell.
3.
Benhabib, S. 1992. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press with Blackwell.
4.
Eder, K.1998. `Societies Learn and Yet the World is Hard to Change'. European Journal of Social Theory2:195-215.
5.
Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
6.
Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
8.
Habermas, J. 1971. Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press.
9.
Habermas, J.1973. `A PostScript to Knowledge and Human Interests'. Philosophy of Social Science, 3:182-185.
10.
Habermas, J. 1974. Theory and Practice. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
11.
Habermas, J. 1976. Legitimation Crisis, trans. Thomas McCarthy. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
12.
Habermas, J. 1979. Communication and the evolution of Society. London: Heinemann.
13.
Habermas, J.1980. `History And Evolution'. Telos39:44.
14.
Habermas, J. 1982. `Reply To My Critics', in J. B. Thompson and D. Held (eds.), Habermas: Critical Debates. London: Macmillan.
15.
Habermas, J. 1983. `Interpretive Social Science vs. Hermeneuticism', in N. Haanet al. (eds.), Social Science as Moral Inquiry. New York: Columbia University Press.
16.
Habermas, J. 1984. The Theory Of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason And The Rationalization Of Society. London: Heinemann.
17.
Habermas, J. 1987a. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2: The Critique of Functionalist Reason. Oxford: Polity Press.
18.
Habermas, J. 1987b. `The Entwinement of Myth and Enlightenment: Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno', in J. Habermas, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Oxford: Polity with Blackwell.
19.
Habermas, J. 1988 [1967]. On the Logic of the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Polity Press.
20.
Habermas, J. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity: Blackwell.
21.
Habermas, J. 1996. `Modernity; An Unfinished Project', in M. P. D'Entreves and S. Benhabib (eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity: Critical Essays on the Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Oxford: Polity.
22.
Honneth, A. and Joas, J. 1988. Social Action and Human Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
How, A. 1995. The Habermas-Gadamer Debate and the Nature of the Social. Aldershot: Avebury Ashgate.
24.
Ingram, D. 1987. Habermas and the Dialectic of Reason. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
25.
Jay, M. 1984. Marxism and Totality: The Adventures of a Concept from Lukacs to Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
Kantorowicz, E. 1997 [1957]. The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
Keat, R. 1981. The Politics of Social Theory: Habermas, Freud and the Critique of Positivism. Oxford: Blackwell.
28.
Kohlberg, L. 1971. `From Is to Ought', in T. Mischel (ed.), Cognitive Development and Epistemology. New York: Academic Press.
29.
McCarthy, T. 1978. The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas. London: Hutchinson.
30.
McCarthy, T. 1982. `Rationality and Relativism: Habermas's Overcoming of Hermeneutics', in J.B. Thompson and D. Held (eds.), Habermas: Critical Debates. London: Macmillan.
31.
Mueller-Vollmer, K. (ed.) 1986. The Hermeneutics Reader: Texts of the German Tradition from the Enlightenment to the Present. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
32.
Ormiston, G. L. and Schrift, A. (eds.) 1990. The Hermeneutic Tradition: From Ast to Ricoeur. Albany: State University of New York Press.
33.
Popper, K. 1957. The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
34.
Rockmore, T. 1989. Habermas on Historical Materialism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
35.
Runciman, W. G.1998. `The Selectionist Paradigm and Its Implications for Sociology'. Sociology32:163-185.
36.
Strydom, P.1992. `The Ontogenetic Fallacy: The Immanent Critique of Habermas' Developmental-Logical Theory of Evolution'. Theory Culture & Society, 9:65-93.
37.
Walzer, M. 1974. Regicide and Revolution: Speeches at the Trial of Louis XVI. London: Cambridge University Press.
38.
White, S. 1988. The Recent Work of Jurgen Habermas: Reason, Justice and Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Whitebook, J. 1995. Peversion and Utopia: A Study in Psychoanalysis and Critical Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
