Taking research on social change one step further and into the digital: Commentary on Organising for Change: Social Change Makers and Social Change Organisations by Silke Roth and Clare Saunders
Restricted accessMeeting reportFirst published online May, 2025
Taking research on social change one step further and into the digital: Commentary on Organising for Change: Social Change Makers and Social Change Organisations by Silke Roth and Clare Saunders
BenfordR. D. (1993). Frame disputes within the nuclear disarmament movement. Social Forces, 71(3), 677–701.
2.
DianiM. (1992). The concept of social movement. The Sociological Review, 40(1), 1–25.
3.
D’IgnazioC.KleinL. F. (2020). Data feminism. The MIT Press.
4.
FerreeM. M.GamsonW. A.GerhardsJ.RuchtD. (2002). Shaping abortion discourse: Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge University Press.
5.
GamsonW. A.ModiglianiA. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.
6.
HallS. (1982). The rediscovery of ideology: Return of the repressed in media studies. In GurevitchM.BennettT.CurranJ.WoollacottJ. (Eds.), Culture, society, and the media (pp. 52–86). Routledge.
7.
JacksonS. J.BaileyM.Foucault WellesB. (2020). #HashtagActivism: Networks of race and gender justice. The MIT Press.
8.
PavanE. (2014). Embedding digital communications within collective action networks: A multidimensional network approach. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 19(4), 441–455.
9.
PavanE.RapiniA. (2022). Battles over issues in networked publics: Investigating the discursive mobilization of the antifascist frame on Twitter. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 27(1), 69–90.
10.
SteenE.YurechkoK.KlugD. (2023). You can (not) say what you want: Using algospeak to contest and evade algorithmic content moderation on TikTok. Social Media + Society, 9(3), 1–17.
11.
SteinbergM. W. (1998). Tilting the frame: Considerations on collective action framing from a discursive turn. Theory and Society, 27(6), 845–872.
12.
TillyC. (1986). The contentious French. Harvard University Press.