This article draws on theories of therapeutic politics to explore the role of institutionalised dignity as a medium for the social and political participation of traumatised people. Using the Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse as a case study, the article offers a psychosocial account of shame and humiliation as key characteristics of the phenomenology of trauma, and presents dignity as the organising principle of a therapeutic politics. Through interviews with survivors of child sexual abuse who testified to the Commission, as well as former Commission staff, the article describes the practices and structures of dignity as they were institutionalised within the Commission. We suggest that institutionalised dignity can ground and guide the theory and practice of a therapeutic politics and institutional responses to trauma, violence and abuse.
AtkinsonJ. (2002). Trauma trails, recreating song lines: The transgenerational effects of trauma in Indigenous Australia. Spinifex Press.
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
6.
BrennanC. (2015). Trials and contestations: Ireland’s Ryan Commission. In SköldJ.SwainS. (Eds.), Apologies and the legacy of abuse of children in ‘care’: International perspectives (pp. 55–69). Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
BrownW. (1995). States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton University Press.
8.
ChefetzR. A. (2017). Dignity is the opposite of shame, and pride is the opposite of guilt. Attachment: New Directions in Relational Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, 11(2), 119–133.
9.
DolezalL. (2015). The body and shame: Phenomenology, feminism, and the socially shaped body. Lexington Books.
10.
HartlingL. M.LindnerE. G. (2018). Can systemic humiliation be transformed into systemic dignity? In RothbartD. (Ed.), Systemic humiliation in America: Finding dignity within systems of degradation (pp. 19–51). Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
HermanJ. (1992). Trauma and recovery. Basic Books.
12.
HermanJ. L. (2012). Shattered shame states and their repair. In YellinJ.WhiteK. (Eds.), Shattered states: Disorganised attachment and its repair (pp. 157–170). Karnac Books.
13.
HicksD. (2011). Dignity: The essential role it plays in resolving conflict. Yale University Press.
14.
JonesJ. (1994). Towards an understanding of power relationships in institutional abuse. Early Child Development and Care, 100(1), 69–76.
15.
LockeJ. (2007). Shame and the future of feminism. Hypatia, 22(4), 146–162.
16.
McGlynnC.DownesJ.WestmarlandN. (2017). Seeking justice for survivors of sexual violence: Recognition, voice and consequences. In ZinsstagE.KeenanM. (Eds.), Restorative responses to sexual violence: Legal, social and therapeutic dimensions (pp. 179–191). Routledge.
17.
McPhillipsK.SalterM.Roberts-PedersenE.KezelmanC. (2020). Understanding trauma as a system of psycho-social harm: Contributions from the Australian Royal Commission into Child Sex Abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 99, 1–11.
18.
MuntS. R. (2017). Queer attachments: The cultural politics of shame. Routledge.
SalmenniemiS. (2019). Therapeutic politics: Critique and contestation in the post-political conjuncture. Social Movement Studies, 18(2), 408–424.
23.
SalterM. (2020). The transitional space of public inquiries: The case of the Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Journal of Criminology, 53(2), 213–230.
SalterM.HallH. (2020). Reducing shame, promoting dignity: A model for the primary prevention of complex post-traumatic stress disorder. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020979667
26.
SaraiyaT.Lopez-CastroT. (2016). Ashamed and afraid: A scoping review of the role of shame in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Journal of Clinical Medicine, 5(11), 94–115.
27.
ScamblerG. (2019). A sociology of shame and blame: Insiders versus outsiders. Springer.
28.
SchoreA. N. (1998). Early shame experiences and infant brain development. In GilbertP.AndrewsB. (Eds.), Shame: Interpersonal behavior, psychopathology, and culture (pp. 57–77). Oxford University Press.
SköldJ. (2015). Apology politics: Transnational features. In SköldJ.SwainS. (Eds.), Apologies and the legacy of abuse of children in ‘care’ (pp. 13–26). Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
SmithC. P.FreydJ. J. (2014). Institutional betrayal. American Psychologist, 69(6), 575–587.
32.
SteinA (2011). The forum: Therapeutic politics – An oxymoron?Sociological Forum, 26(1), 187–193.
33.
SummerfieldD. (1999). A critique of seven assumptions behind psychological trauma programmes in war-affected areas. Social Science & Medicine, 48(10), 1449–1462.
34.
Vera-GrayF. (2020). The whole place self: Reflecting on the original working practices of rape crisis. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 4(1), 59–72.
35.
WexlerD. B.WinickB. J. (1991). Therapeutic jurisprudence as a new approach to mental health law policy analysis and research. University of Miami Law Review, 45(5), 979–1004.
36.
WhittierN. (2009). The politics of child sexual abuse: Emotion, social movements, and the state. Oxford University Press.
37.
WoodwardK. (2000). Traumatic shame: Toni Morrison, televisual culture, and the cultural politics of the emotions. Cultural Critique, 46, 210–240.
38.
WrightK. (2008). Theorizing therapeutic culture: Past influences, future directions. Journal of Sociology, 44(4), 321–336.
39.
WrightK. (2020). Recognising the political in the therapeutic. In NehringD.MadsenJ. O.CabanasE.MillsC.KerriganD. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of global therapeutic cultures (pp. 421–434). Routledge.
40.
WrightK.SwainS.McPhillipsK. (2017). The Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 74, 1–9.
41.
YoungA. (1997). The harmony of illusions: Inventing post-traumatic stress disorder. Princeton University Press.
