How to engage with the recent crisis of liberal democracy in a politically productive manner? Using the example of Hungary, the first part of this article contrasts two empirical strategies. The first takes inspiration from Science and Technology Studies (STS) and explores the conditions of critique within the architecture and infrastructure of liberal democracy. The second empirical strategy turns to a novel by László Krasznahorkai and a film by Béla Tarr, and engages with the problem of critique through búskomorság. This common Hungarian word refers to a sad-sombre sentiment that is both collective and thoroughly political. The second part of the article focuses on an exhibition created by Béla Tarr that combined these two empirical strategies in a generative way. With the help of the exhibition and recent empirical examples, the article outlines what could be called búskomor politics – a set of critical practices that take place not so much within the architecture and the infrastructure of liberal democracy as amid its ruins.
AbrahamssonS.DányiE. (2019). Becoming stronger by becoming weaker: The hunger strike as a mode of doing politics. Journal of International Relations and Development, 22(4): 882–898.
2.
BarryA. (2013). Material politics: Disputes along the pipeline. John Wiley & Sons.
3.
BenjaminW. (1994). Left-wing melancholy. In KaesA.JayM.DimendbergE. (Eds.), The Weimar Republic sourcebook (pp. 304–306). University of California Press.
4.
BenjaminW. (2003). The origin of German tragic drama. Verso.
5.
BoltanskiL. (2011). On critique. Polity.
6.
BowkerG. C.StarS. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press.
7.
BowringJ. (2008). A field guide to melancholy. Oldcastle Books.
8.
BraunB.WhatmoreS. (2010). Political matter: Technoscience, democracy, and public life. University of Minnesota Press.
9.
BrownW. (1999). Resisting left melancholy. Boundary 2, 26(3), 19–27.
10.
ClairJ. (2005). Mélancolie: Génie et folie en Occident. Gallimard.
11.
DányiE. (2012). Parliament politics: A material-semiotic analysis of liberal democracy (PhD thesis). Department of Sociology, Lancaster University.
12.
DányiE. (2015). The parliament as a high-political programme. In MüllerA.ReichmannW. (Eds.), Architecture, materiality and society: Connecting sociology of architecture with science and technology studies (pp. 99–118). Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
DányiE. (2018). Good treason: Following actor-network theory to the realm of drug policy. In BergerT.EsguerraA. (Eds.), World politics in translation: Power, relationality and difference in global cooperation (pp. 25–38). Routledge.
14.
DányiE.SpencerM. (2020). Un/common grounds: Tracing politics across worlds. Social Studies of Science, forthcoming.
15.
De GenovaN. (2017). The borders of ‘Europe’: Autonomy of migration, tactics of bordering. Duke University Press.
16.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus. University of Minnesota Press.
17.
FöldényiL. (2016). Melancholy. Yale University Press.
18.
FoucaultM. (1997). What is critique? In LotringerS. (Ed.), The politics of truth (pp. 41–81). Semiotext(e).
19.
FreudS. (2005). On murder, mourning and melancholia. Penguin.
20.
FukuyamaF. (2018). Identity: The demand for dignity and the politics of resentment. Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
21.
GafijczukD.SayerD. (2013). The inhabited ruins of Central Europe: Re-imagining space, history and memory. Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
GinnF. (2015). When horses won’t eat: Apocalypse and the anthropocene. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(2): 351–359.
23.
GuldemondJ. (2017). Béla Tarr: Till the end of the world. EYE Filmmuseum.
24.
HarveyP.JensenC. B.MoritaA. (2016). Infrastructures and social complexity. New York: Routledge.
25.
HennionA. (2016). Fallacy of the work, truth of the performance: What makes music baroque: Historical authenticity or ontological plurality? In LawJ.RuppertE. (Eds.), Modes of knowing: Resources from the baroque (pp. 84–114). Mattering Press.
26.
HobsbawmE.RangerT. (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge University Press.
27.
HuyssenA. (2003). Present pasts: Urban palimpsests and the politics of memory. Stanford University Press.
28.
Knorr-CetinaK. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge. Pergamon.
29.
KovácsA. B. (2013). The cinema of Béla Tarr: The circle closes. Columbia University Press.
30.
KrasznahorkaiL. (1998). The melancholy of resistance (SzirtesG., Trans.). Tuskar Rock Press.
31.
KwaC. (2002). Romantic and baroque conceptions of complex wholes in the sciences. In LawJ.MolA. (Eds.), Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices (pp. 23–52). Duke University Press.
32.
LatourB. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2): 225–248.
33.
LatourB. (2013). Facing Gaia: A new enquiry into natural religion. Gifford Lectures, Edinburgh.
34.
LatourB.WeibelP. (2005). Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy. MIT Press.
35.
LatourB.WoolgarS. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press.
36.
LawJ. (2002). Aircraft stories: Decentering the object in technoscience. Duke University Press.
RabinowP.MarcusG. E.FaubionJ.ReesT. (2008). Designs for an anthropology of the contemporary. Duke University Press.
49.
RancièreJ. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. University of Minnesota Press.
50.
RancièreJ. (2015). Béla Tarr, the time after. University of Minnesota Press.
51.
SchmittC. (1988). The crisis of parliamentary democracy. MIT Press.
52.
SerresM. (2009). Angels: A modern myth. Flammarion-Pere Castor.
53.
ShapiroM. J. (2016). ‘The light of reason’: Reading the Leviathan with ‘The Werckmeister harmonies’. Political Theory, 45(3), 385–415.
54.
StolerA. L. (2013). Imperial debris: On ruins and ruination. Duke University Press.
55.
TraversoE. (2017). Left-wing melancholia: Marxism, history, and memory. Columbia University Press.
56.
TsingA. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world. Princeton University Press.
57.
TsingA. L.BubandtN.SwansonH. A.GanE. (2017). Arts of living on a damaged planet. University of Minnesota Press.
58.
Viveiros de CastroE.DanowskiD. (2018). Humans and terrans in the Gaia war. In de la CadenaM.BlaserM. (Eds.), A world of many worlds (pp. 172–203). Duke University Press.
59.
von SchnitzlerA. (2016). Democracy’s infrastructure. Princeton University Press.
60.
ZakariaF. (1997). The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76(6), 22–43.
