Legal recognition of same-sex partnerships and marriages has been at the forefront of media attention in East Asian societies. For our comparative study, we carried out qualitative in-depth interviews with 31 gay men and lesbians to investigate the nuanced understanding of marriage, family and sexual citizenship within the context of debates on marriage equality across Hong Kong, Japan and Taiwan. Expanding on the theoretical concepts in Chen’s ‘Asia as method’, Iwabuchi’s ‘inter-Asian referencing’ and Yue and Leung’s ‘queer Asia as method’, we aim to understand how the act of marriage is defined, conducted and rationalized amidst a web of social relations within each research locale. We argue that despite the variations in the structure and practice of kin relations, same-sex unions cannot be detached from the kinship institution in the three research sites. Our study points to a different perspective on same-sex marriage that goes beyond the binary of assimilation to/dismantling of the heterosexual marriage institution by attending to the structural and symbolic significance of the family and community.
BeamM. (2018). Gay, Inc. The nonprofitization of queer politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
2.
BrainerA. (2019). Queer kinship and family change in Taiwan. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
3.
ButlerJ. (2002). Is kinship always heterosexual?Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 13, 14–44.
4.
ChenK. H. (2010). Asia as method: Toward deimperialization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
ChengY. H. A.WuF. C. F.AdamczykA. (2016). Changing attitudes toward homosexuality in Taiwan, 1995–2012. Chinese Sociological Review, 48, 317–345.
6.
ChiangH. (2017). Intimate equality and transparent selves: Legalising transgender marriage in Hong Kong. Culture, Theory and Critique, 58, 166–181.
7.
ChienC. C. (2012). From ‘same sex marriage’ to ‘pluralistic family arrangements’: The legislative movement for democratic intimate relationship. Taiwan Human Rights Journal, 1, 187–201.
8.
ChoiS. Y.LuoM. (2016). Performative family: Homosexuality, marriage and intergenerational dynamics in China. The British Journal of Sociology, 67, 260–280.
ClarkeV.FinlayS. J. (2004). For better or worse? Lesbian and gay marriage. Feminism & Psychology, 14, 17–23.
11.
DugganL. (2002). The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In CastronovoR.NelsonD. D. (Eds.), Materializing democracy: Toward a revitalized cultural politics (pp. 175–194). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
12.
EskridgeW. N.Jr(2002). Equality practice: Civil unions and the future of gay rights. New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
HoP. S. Y. (2008). Not so great expectations: Sex and housewives in Hong Kong. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 338–349.
14.
HorieY. (2010). 同性間の婚姻に関する批判的考察—日本の社会制度の文脈から [Critical consideration of ‘marriage’ between same-sex partners: From the context of Japan’s social system]. 社会システム研究 (Social System Research), 21, 37–57.
15.
HuangS. (2019). Beyond the sex-love-marriage alignment: Xinghun among queer people in mainland China. In YarbroughM. W.JonesA.DeFilippisJ. N. (Eds.), Queer families and relationships after marriage equality (pp. 136–149). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
16.
IwabuchiK. (2013). De-westernisation, inter-Asian referencing and beyond. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17, 44–57.
17.
IwabuchiK.KimH. M.HsiaH.-C. (2016). Rethinking multiculturalism from a trans-East-Asian perspective. In IwabuchiK.KimH. M.HsiaH.-C. (Eds.), Multiculturalism in East Asia: A transnational exploration of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan (pp. 1–18). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
18.
JeffreysS. (2004). The need to abolish marriage. Feminism & Psychology, 14, 327–331.
19.
KamL. Y. L. (2013). Shanghai lalas: Female tongzhi communities and politics in urban China. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
20.
KamanoS.IshidaH.KazamaT.YoshinakaT.KawaguchiK. (2016). 性的マイノリティについての意識―2015年全国調査報告書 [Attitudes toward sexual minorities in Japan: Report of 2015 national survey]. Edited by grant-in-aid for scientific research (B) ‘Construction of Queer Studies in Japan’ research group (Principal investigator: Kazuya Kawaguchi, Hiroshima Shudo University).
21.
KollmanK.WaitesM. (2009). The global politics of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender human rights: An introduction. Contemporary Politics, 15, 1–17.
22.
KongT. S. K. (2011). Chinese male homosexualities: Memba, tongzhi and golden boy. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
23.
LeeL. J. (2003). 法不入家門？家事法演變的法律社會學分析 [Between the state and the family – a study of recent Taiwanese family law development] 中原財經法學 (ChungYuan Financial & Economic Law Review), 10, 41–83. Retrieved from http://cycu.lawbank.com.tw/Download/10/01240001.pdf (accessed 18 June 2018).
24.
LeeL. J. (2007). 婚姻家庭與性別平等—親屬法變遷的觀察與反思 [Family and gender equality: A critical assessment on family law reform]. 政大法學評論 (Chengchi Law Review), 95, 175–227.
25.
LiT. I. (2007). 以家之實，抗家之名：台灣女同志的成家實踐 [Lesbian ‘doing family’ in Taiwan] (Master Degree Thesis). Taipei: National Taiwan University.
26.
Liberal Democratic Party of Japan. (2016). 性的指向・ 性同一性（性自認）の 多様性って? [Sexual orientation and the diversity of sexual identification?]. Retrieved from http://jimin.ncss.nifty.com/pdf/news/policy/132489_2.pdf (accessed 15 December 2018).
27.
MareeC. (2004). Same-sex partnerships in Japan: Bypasses and other alternatives. Women’s Studies, 33, 541–549.
28.
NairY. (2010). Against equality, against marriage: An introduction. In ConradR. (Ed.), Against equality: Queer critiques of marriage (pp. 1–10). Lewiston, ME: Against Equality Press.
29.
National Institute for Population and Social Security Research. (2017). The fifteenth Japanese national fertility survey in 2015. Tokyo, Japan: Author.
30.
PeelE.HardingR. (2008). Editorial introduction: Recognizing and celebrating same-sex relationships: Beyond the normative debate. Sexualities, 11, 659–666.
31.
ShidaT. (2009). 同性婚批判 [A critique of same-sex marriage]. In ShidaT. (Ed.), 挑発するセクシュアリティー法・社会・思想へのアプローチ [Provocative sexuality: Approach to law, society and thoughts]. Tokyo, Japan: Shinsensha.
32.
ShimizuA. (2015). ようこそ、ゲイ・フレンドリーな街へ [Welcome to a gay-friendly town]. Gendai Shisou, 43, 144–155.
33.
SmartC. (2007). Same sex couples and marriage: Negotiating relational landscapes with families and friends. The Sociological Review, 55, 671–686.
34.
SuenY. T.WongA. W. C.BarrowA.WongM. Y.MakW. W.-S.ChoiP. K.LauT. F. (2016). Study on legislation against discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation, gender identity and intersex status. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Equal Opportunities Commission.
35.
TakeuchiY. (2005). Asia as method. In What is modernity? Writings of Takeuchi Yoshimi (Ed., Trans. CalichmanR. F.) (pp. 149–165). New York, NY: Columbia University Press (Original work published 1960).
36.
TamagawaM. (2015). Same-sex marriage in Japan. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 12, 160–187.
TangD. T.-S. (2011). Conditional spaces: Hong Kong lesbian desires and everyday life. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
39.
TingK. F. (2014). Continuities and changes: Five decades of marital experiences in Hong Kong. In DavisD. S.FriedmanS. L. (Eds.), Wives, husbands, and lovers: Marriage and sexuality in Hong Kong (pp. 147–164). Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
40.
WeeksJ.HeaphyB.DonovanC. (2001). Same sex intimacies: Families of choice and other life experiments. London, UK: Routledge.
41.
YeoD. T. E.ChuT. H. (2018). Beyond homonegativity: Understanding Hong Kong people’s attitudes about social acceptance of gay/lesbian people, sexual orientation discrimination protection, and same-sex marriage. Journal of Homosexuality, 65, 1372–1390.
42.
YueA. (2017). Trans-Singapore: Queer Asia as method. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 18, 10–24.
43.
YueA.LeungH. H. S. (2015). Notes towards the queer Asian city: Singapore and Hong Kong. Urban Studies, 54, 747–764.
