Globally, conventional understandings of work no longer have much purchase for the efforts of most people to sustain minimally viable existences. This article critically expands on Bourdieu’s theory of practice by looking at the making of livelihoods of urban youth in as diverse places as Abidjan, Athens, Berlin and Jakarta, affected by transformations of work coined with the term ‘precarity’. This article discusses instability as one aspect of the set of experiences of ‘precarity’. Instability challenges how individuation and sociation work upon each other; what Bourdieu has described with the concept of habitus. Drawing on empirical material from the four cities, we explore practices of accruing value in a context of instability and conceptualize them as ‘detaching’ and ‘gathering’. We suggest that a rethinking of practices in relation to dispositions and habitus may enable us to better grasp the improvisations and more fluid forms of social life that characterize the contemporary urban life of many, and can help to address social inequalities today in a refined way.
AbrahamsJ.IngramN. (2013). The chameleon habitus. Sociological Research Online, 18, 1–14.
2.
AdamsM. (2006). Hybridizing habitus and reflexivity: Towards an understanding of contemporary identity?Sociology, 40, 511–528.
3.
AdkinsL.SkeggsB. (2004). Feminism after Bourdieu. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
4.
AkindésF. (2000). Inégalités sociales et régulation politique en Côte d’Ivoire. Politique Africaine, 2, 126–141.
5.
AtkinsonW. (2011). Class, individualization, and late modernity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
BarbierJ.-C. (2005). La précarité, une catégorie française à l’épreuve de la comparaison internationale. Revue Française de Sociologie, 46, 351–371.
7.
BazinL. (2014). Le travail. Politique Africaine, 1, 7–33.
8.
BazinL.GnabéliR. Y. (1997). Le travail salarié, un modèle de décomposition? In ContaminB.Memel-FoteH. (Eds.), Le modèle ivoirien en questions (pp. 689–705). Paris, France: Karthala.
9.
BehtouiA. (2016). Beyond social ties: The impact of social capital on labour market outcomes for young Swedish people. Journal of Sociology, 52, 711–724.
10.
BerryS. (2007). Marginal gains, market values, and history. African Studies Review, 50, 57–70.
11.
BhambraG. K. (2014). Connected sociologies. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
12.
BhambraG. K.SantosB. d. S. (2017). Introduction: Global challenges for sociology. Sociology, 51, 3–10.
13.
BloklandT. (2017). Community as urban practice. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
14.
BloklandT.GiustozziC.KrügerD.SchillingH. (2016). Creating the unequal city. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
15.
BloklandT.NoordhoffF. (2008). The weakness of weak ties: Social capital to get ahead among the urban poor in Rotterdam and Amsterdam. In SavageM.BloklandT. (Eds.), Networked urbanism (pp. 105–125). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
16.
BlossfeldH.-P.KlijzingE.MillsM.KurzK. (Eds.). (2005). Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
17.
BorlagdanJ. (2015). Inequality and 21-year-olds’ negotiation of uncertain transitions to employment: A Bourdieusian approach. Journal of Youth Studies, 18, 839–854.
18.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
BourdieuP. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20.
BourdieuP. (1998a). Contre-feux. Propos pour servir à la résistance contre l’invasion néo-libérale. Paris, France: Liber-Raisons d’Agir.
21.
BourdieuP. (1998b). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22.
BourdieuP. (2001). Pascalian meditations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
BourdieuP.AccardoA. (1993). La misère du monde. Paris, France: Seuil.
24.
BremanJ. (2013). A bogus concept?New Left Review, 84, 130–138.
25.
BurawoyM. (2001). Manufacturing the global. Ethnography, 2, 147–159.
26.
BurawoyM. (2016). The promise of sociology: Global challenges for national disciplines. Sociology, 50, 949–959.
27.
BurawoyM.von HoldtK. (2012). Conversations with Bourdieu: The Johannesburg moment. Johannesburg, South Africa: Wits University Press.
CromptonR. (2006). Employment and the family: The reconfiguration of work and family life in contemporary societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
CromptonR. (2008). Class and stratification. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
33.
DalsgaardA. L.FranchM.ScottR. P. (2008). Dominant idea, uncertain lives. The meaning of youth in Recife. In HansenK. Tranberg (Ed.), Youth and the city in the global south (pp. 49–73). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
34.
DanielA.MüllerS.StollF.ÖhlschlägerR. (Eds.). (2016). Mittelklassen, Mittelschichten oder Milieus in Afrika?Germany: Nomos e Library.
35.
de CerteauM. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
Destatis. (2012). Niedriglohn und Beschäftigung 2010. Wiesbaden, Germany: Statistisches Bundesamt.
37.
DörreK.ScherschelK.BoothM.HaubnerT.MarquardsenK.SchierhornK. (2013). Bewährungsproben für die Unterschicht?Frankfurt, Germany: Campus.
38.
EliasN. (1987). Involvement and detachment. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
39.
FarrugiaD. (2013). Young people and structural inequality: Beyond the middle ground. Journal of Youth Studies, 16, 679–693.
40.
FergusonJ. (2015). Give a man a fish: Reflections on the new politics of distribution. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
41.
FriedmanS. (2016). Habitus clivé and the emotional imprint of social mobility. Sociological Review, 64, 129–147.
42.
FurlongA. (1992). Growing up in a classless society? School to work transitions. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
43.
GayP. (1996). Consumption and identity at work. London, UK: Sage.
44.
GießelmannM. (2009). Arbeitsmarktpolitischer Wandel in Deutschland seit 1991 und das Working Poor-Problem. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 38, 215–238.
45.
GuyerJ. I. (2004). Marginal gains. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46.
HeinzW.R. (2009). Youth transitions in an age of uncertainty. In FurlongA. (Eds.), Handbook of youth and young adulthood (pp. 3–13). London, UK: Routledge.
47.
HuppatzK. (2012). Gender capital at work: Intersections of femininity, masculinity, class and occupation. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
48.
IgnatowG. (2009). Why the sociology of morality needs Bourdieu’s habitus. Sociological Inquiry, 79, 98–114.
49.
IvanaG.-I. (2017). Fake it till you make it: Imagined social capital. The Sociological Review, 65, 52–66.
50.
JamiesonL. (1998). Intimacy: Personal relationships in modern societies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
51.
KatzC. (1996). Towards minor theory. Environment and Planning D, 14, 487–499.
52.
KouakouC. K. (2011). Urban youth labour. Supply and employment policy in Côte d’Ivoire. Nairobi, Kenya: African Economic Research Consortium (AERC).
53.
KusnoA. (2013). Housing the margin. Indonesia, 94, 23–56.
54.
LareauA. (2002). Invisible inequality: Social class and childrearing in black families and white families. American Sociological Review, 67, 747–776.
55.
MacDonaldR. (1997). Youth, the ‘underclass’ and social exclusion. London, UK: Routledge.
56.
Manou-SavinaA.AntoineP.DubressonA.DiahouA. Y. (1985). Les en-haut des en-bas et les en-bas des en-haut. Classes moyennes et urbanisation à Abidjan. Revue Tiers Monde, 26, 55–68.
57.
MatlonJ. (2016). Racial capitalism and the crisis of black masculinity. American Sociological Review, 81, 1014–1038.
58.
MatsaganisM. (2013). The crisis and the welfare state in Greece: A complex relationship. In TriandafyllidouA.GropasR.KoukiH. (Eds.), Identities and modernities in Europe (pp. 152–177). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
59.
Mayer-AhujaN. (2017). The globality of insecure labor as a conceptual provocation. Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 43, 264–296.
60.
McCallL. (1992). Does gender fit? Bourdieu, feminism, and conceptions of social order. Theory and Society, 21, 837–867.
61.
McCallL. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800.
62.
McFarlaneC. (2010). The comparative city: Knowledge, learning, urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34, 725–742.
63.
MisztalB. A. (2001). Normality and trust in Goffman’s theory of interaction order. Sociological Theory, 19, 312–324.
64.
MunckR. (2013). The precariat: A view from the south. Third World Quarterly, 34, 747–762.
65.
MunckR. (2016). Global sociology: Towards an alternative southern paradigm. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 29, 233–249.
66.
NeilsonB.RossiterN. (2008). Precarity as a political concept, or, fordism as exception. Theory, Culture & Society, 25, 51–72.
67.
NeubertD. (2014). What is ‘middle class’?Middle East Topics and Arguments, 2, 23–35.
68.
ParetM. (2016). Towards a precarity agenda. Global Labour Journal, 7, 111–122.
69.
PatelS. (2014). Afterword: Doing global sociology. Current Sociology, 62, 603–613.
70.
ReckwitzA. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 243–263.
71.
RheinT. (2013). Deutsche Geringverdiener im europäischen Vergleich (IAB-Kurzbericht 15). Bielefeld, Germany: Institut für Arbeits- und Berufsforschung der Bundesagentur für Arbeit.
72.
RobinsonJ. (2011). Cities in a world of cities: The comparative gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35, 1–23.
73.
RobinsonJ. (2016). Thinking cities through elsewhere. Progress in Human Geography, 40, 3–29.
74.
SavageM. (2000). Class analysis and social transformation. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
75.
SavageM. (2015). Social class in the 21st century. London, UK: Pelican.
76.
SavageM.DevineF.CunninghamN.TaylorM.LiY.HjellbrekkeJ.MilesA. (2013). A new model of social class?Sociology, 47, 219–250.
77.
SchäferH. (2012). Kreativität und Gewohnheit. Ein Vergleich zwischen Praxistheorie und Pragmatismus. In GöttlichU.KurtR. (Eds.), Kreativität und Improvisation (pp. 17–43). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.
78.
ScullyB. (2016). Precarity north and south: A southern critique of Guy Standing. Global Labour Journal, 7, 160–173.
79.
ShildrickT.MacDonaldR.WebsterC. (2012). Poverty and insecurity: Life in ‘low-pay, no-pay’ Britain. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
80.
SilvaE. B. (2016a). Habitus: Beyond sociology. The Sociological Review, 64, 73–92.
81.
SilvaE. B. (2016b). Unity and fragmentation of the habitus. The Sociological Review, 64, 166–183.
82.
SimoneA. (2004a). For the city yet to come. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
83.
SimoneA. (2004b). People as infrastructure. Public Culture, 16, 407–429.
84.
SimoneA. (2010). City life from Jakarta to Dakar: Movements at the crossroads. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
85.
SimoneA. (2018). Improvised lives: Rhythms of endurance in an urban south. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
SkeggsB. (2011). Imagining personhood differently. The Sociological Review, 59, 496–513.
90.
SmythL. (2016). The disorganized family: Institutions, practices and normativity. British Journal of Sociology, 67, 678–696.
91.
StandingG. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
92.
StandingG. (2014). Understanding the precariat through labour and work. Development and Change, 45, 963–980.
93.
SullivanA. (2001). Cultural capital and educational attainment. Sociology, 35, 893–912.
94.
TubadjiA. (2012). Youth unemployment in Greece economic and political perspectives. Berlin, Germany: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
95.
van der LindenM. (2008). Workers of the world: Essays toward a global labor history. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
96.
VerhaegheP.-P.van der BrachtK.van de PutteB. (2015). Inequalities in social capital and their longitudinal effects on the labour market entry. Social Networks, 40, 174–184.
97.
WacquantL. (2008). Ghettos and anti-ghettos: An anatomy of the new urban poverty. Thesis Eleven, 94, 113–118.
98.
WacquantL. (2016). A concise genealogy and anatomy of habitus. The Sociological Review, 64, 64–72.
99.
WerbnerP. (2017). Rethinking class and culture in Africa. Review of African Political Economy, 45, 7–24.
100.
WernerG. (2004). Cultural capital and social inequality in the life course. European Sociological Review, 20, 333–344.
