The aim of this article is to explain how forms of consent-driven domination are produced over actors with critical capacity to question the processes of domination to which they are subjected. Drawing on observations of meetings during which actors evaluated employee sick leave, we show how domination is locally achieved in situated interactions by (a) constructing a specific situational reality, (b) transferring responsibilities in accordance with this reality, and (c) positioning the actors within the confirmed bounds of the situation. Domination is produced by exploiting a gap between the reified instituted reality and the lived realities of embodied actors. Doing so enables critiques of the workplace to be absorbed and situational responsibility to be directed towards individual employees. Engaging with French sociologist Luc Boltanski’s recent work, we refer to these processes as ‘complex domination’: the domination appears centre-less and well-intentioned politics result in permanent asymmetrical outcomes – that is, the same people always lose.
BjörnbergU. (2012). Social policy reforms in Sweden: New perspectives on rights and obligations. In LarssonB.LetellM.ThörnH. (Eds.), Transformation of the Swedish welfare state: From social engineering to governance (pp. 71–85). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
BoltanskiL. (2011). On critique: A sociology of emancipation. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
4.
BoltanskiL. (2013). A journey through French style critique. In du GayP.MorganG. (Eds.), New spirits of capitalism: Crises, justifications, and dynamics (pp. 43–59). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5.
BoltanskiL. (2014). Mysteries and conspiracies: Detective stories, spy novels and the making of modern societies. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
6.
BoltanskiL.ChiapelloE. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. London, UK: Verso.
7.
BoltanskiL.HonnethA.CelikatesR. (2014). Sociology of critique or critical theory? Luc Boltanski and Axel Honneth in conversation with Robin Celikates. In SusenS.TurnerB. S. (Eds.), The spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the pragmatic sociology of critique (pp. 561–589). London, UK: Anthem Press.
8.
BoltanskiL.ThévenotL. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
BourdieuP. (2001). Masculine domination. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
BurawoyM. (1979). Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
DeanM. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London, UK: Sage.
12.
De CockC.NybergD. (2016). The possibility of critique under a financialized capitalism: The case of private equity in the United Kingdom. Organization, 23, 465–484.
13.
FowlerB. (2014). Figures of descent from classical sociological theory: Luc Boltanski. In SusenS.TurnerB. S. (Eds.), The spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the pragmatic sociology of critique (pp. 67–88). London, UK: Anthem Press.
14.
FoucaultM. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London, UK: Tavistock.
15.
FoucaultM. (1988). Technologies of the self. In HuttonP. H.GutmanH.MartinL. H. (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
16.
FoucaultM. (2014). On the government of the living. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
LarssonB.LetellM.ThörnH. (Eds.). (2012). Transformations of the Swedish welfare state: Social engineering, governance and governmentality. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
LusinyanL.BonatoL. (2007). Work absence in Europe (IMF Staff Papers, 54). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
19.
MartinG. P.WaringJ. (2018). Realising governmentality: Pastoral power, governmental discourse and the (re) constitution of subjectivities. The Sociological Review, 66, 1292–1308.
20.
MillerP.RoseN. (2008). Governing the present. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
21.
MunroR. (2017). Creativity, organisation and entrepreneurship: Power and play in the ecological press of money. Organization Studies, 39, 209–227.
StonesR. (2014). Strengths and limitations of Luc Boltanski’sOn Critique. In SusenS.TurnerB. S. (Eds.), The spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the pragmatic sociology of critique (pp. 211–233). London, UK: Anthem Press.
25.
SusenS. (2014). Luc Boltanski and his critics: An afterword. In SusenS.TurnerB. S. (Eds.), The spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the pragmatic sociology of critique (pp. 613–801). London, UK: Anthem Press.
26.
Van GestelN.NybergD.VossenE. (2015). Institutional logics and micro-processes in organizations: A multi-actor perspective on sickness absence management in three Dutch hospitals. In WaldorffS. B.PedersenA. R.FitzgeraldL.FerlieE. (Eds.), Managing change: From health policy to practice (pp. 55–70). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
WaringJ.LatifA. (2017). Of shepherds, sheep and sheepdogs? Governing the adherent self through complementary and competing ‘pastorates’. Sociology, 52, 1069–1086.
28.
WodakR. (2013). Analyzing meetings in political and business contexts: Different genres – similar strategies? In CapC.OkulskaU. (Eds.), Analyzing genres in political communication: Theory and practice (pp. 187–221). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
