Michel Foucault’s concept of governmentality has been hugely influential in sociology and other disciplinary fields. However, its application has been criticised by those who suggest it neglects agency, and gives overwhelming power to governmental discourses in constituting subjectivities, determining behaviour and reproducing social reality. Drawing on posthumously translated lecture transcripts, in this article the authors suggest that Foucault’s nascent concept of pastoral power offers a route to a better conceptualisation of the relationship between discourse, subjectivity and agency, and a means of understanding the (contested, non-determinate, social) process through which governmental discourses are shaped, disseminated and translated into action. The authors offer empirical examples from their work in healthcare of how this process takes place, present a model of the key mechanisms through which contemporary pastoral power operates, and suggest future research avenues for refining, developing or contesting this model.
BacchiC. (2005). Discourse, discourse everywhere: Subject ‘agency’ in feminist discourse methodology. Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 13, 198–209.
2.
BejerotE.HasselbladhH. (2011). Professional autonomy and pastoral power: The transformation of quality registers in Swedish health care. Public Administration, 89, 1604–1621.
3.
BellE.TaylorS. (2003). The elevation of work: Pastoral power and the New Age work ethic. Organization, 10, 329–349.
4.
BenhabibS. (1992). Situating the self. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
5.
BevirM. (2011). Governance and governmentality after neoliberalism. Policy & Politics, 39, 457–471.
6.
BevirM. (2013). A theory of governance. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
BrownW. (2015). Undoing the demos. New York, NY: Zone Books.
8.
ButlerJ. (1997). The psychic life of power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
CadmanL. (2010). How (not) to be governed: Foucault, critique, and the political. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, 539–556.
10.
CaldwellR. (2005). Things fall apart? Discourses on agency and change in organizations. Human Relations, 58, 83–114.
ClarkeJ. (2005). New Labour’s citizens: Activated, empowered, responsibilized, abandoned?Critical Social Policy, 25, 447–463.
13.
DeanM. (2003). Culture governance as individualisation. In Governance as social and political communication (pp. 117–139). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
14.
DonzelotJ. (1991). Pleasure in work. In BurchellG.GordonC.MillerP. (Eds.), The Foucault effect (pp. 251–280). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
FerlieE.McGivernG.FitzgeraldL. (2012). A new mode of organizing in health care? Governmentality and managed networks in cancer services in England. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 340–347.
FoucaultM. (2007b). What is critique? In LotringerS. (Ed.), The politics of truth (pp. 41–81). Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
22.
FoucaultM. (2008). The birth of biopolitics. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
23.
HowleyA.HartnettR. (1992). Pastoral power and the contemporary university: A Foucauldian analysis. Educational Theory, 42, 271–283.
24.
JessopB. (2007). From micro-powers to governmentality: Foucault’s work on statehood, state formation, statecraft and state power. Political Geography, 26, 34–40.
25.
Jiménez-AncaJ. J. (2013). Beyond power: Unbridging Foucault and Weber. European Journal of Social Theory, 16, 36–50.
26.
KnightsD.CollinsonD. (1987). Disciplining the shopfloor: A comparison of the disciplinary effects of managerial psychology and financial accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12, 457–477.
27.
MartinG. P.ArmstrongN.AvelingE.-L.HerbertG.Dixon-WoodsM. (2015). Professionalism redundant, reshaped, or reinvigorated? Realizing the ‘Third Logic’ in contemporary health care. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 56, 378–397.
28.
MartinG. P.LeslieM.MinionJ. T.WillarsJ.Dixon-WoodsM. (2013). Between surveillance and subjectification: Professionals and the governance of quality and patient safety in English hospitals. Social Science & Medicine, 99, 80–88.
29.
MartinR. (1988). Truth, power, self: An interview with Michel Foucault. In MartinL. H.GutmanH.HuttonP. H. (Eds.), Technologies of the self (pp. 9–15). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
30.
NewtonT. (1998). Theorizing subjectivity in organizations: The failure of Foucauldian studies?Organization Studies, 19, 415–447.
31.
OfferA. (1997). Between the gift and the market: The economy of regard. Economic History Review, 50, 450–476.
32.
O’MalleyP.WeirL.ShearingC. (1997). Governmentality, criticism, politics. Economy and Society, 26, 501–517.
33.
PattonP. (1998). Foucault’s subject of power. In MossJ. (Ed.), The later Foucault (pp. 64–77). London, UK: Sage.
34.
PetersenA. (1997). Risk, governance and the new public health. In PetersenA.BuntonR. (Eds.), Foucault, health and medicine (pp. 189–206). London, UK: Routledge.
35.
PetersenA.LuptonD. (1996). The new public health. London, UK: Sage.
36.
RoseN. (1999). Powers of freedom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
RoseN.MillerP. (1992). Political power beyond the State: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43, 173–205.
38.
RoseN.MillerP. (2008). Governing the present. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
39.
RoseN.O’MalleyP.ValverdeM. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 83–104.
40.
RutherfordS. (2007). Green governmentality: Insights and opportunities in the study of nature’s rule. Progress in Human Geography, 31, 291–307.
41.
TamboukouM. (1999). Writing genealogies: An exploration of Foucault’s strategies for doing research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 20, 201–217.
42.
ThompsonK. (2003). Forms of resistance: Foucault on tactical reversal and self-formation. Continental Philosophy Review, 36, 113–138.
43.
WaringJ.LatifA. (2017). Of shepherds, sheep and sheepdogs? Governing the adherent self through complementary and competing ‘pastorates’. Sociology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0038038517690680
44.
WaringJ.LatifA.BoydM.BarberN.ElliottR. (2016). Pastoral power in the community pharmacy: A Foucauldian analysis of services to promote patient adherence to new medicine use. Social Science & Medicine, 148, 123–130.
45.
WaringJ.MartinG. (2016). Network leadership as pastoral power: The governance of quality improvement communities in the English National Health Service. In BevirM. (Ed.), Governmentality after neoliberalism (pp. 135–151). London, UK: Routledge.
46.
WilsonP. M. (2001). A policy analysis of the Expert Patient in the United Kingdom: Self-care as an expression of pastoral power?Health & Social Care in the Community, 9, 134–142.
47.
YoudellD. (2006). Subjectivation and performative politics – Butler thinking Althusser and Foucault: Intelligibility, agency and the raced–nationed–religioned subjects of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27, 511–528.
