In postcolonial agrarian modernity and development, the local ‘work of nature’ is continuously monitored by the external epistemology of scientific agrarianism, where agrarian subjectivity is produced and reproduced through science, technology and the market. Against this background, this research article explored the field view of the contemporary nature of ‘agriculture as performance’ through an ethnographic study in a dryland village in Bolangir district of Odisha. The article concludes that the modernisation and commercialisation of agriculture have reshaped agrarian subjectivity in the direction of market ethics, land use patterns and the individuation of farming households from their traditional collective ties.
AgrawalA. (1995). Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change, 26(3), 413–439.
2.
ApthorpeR. (1984). Agriculture and strategy: The language of development policy. In ClayE. J. & SchafferB. B (Eds.), Room for maneouvre: An exploration of public policy in agriculture and rural development. Heinemann.
3.
AyroutH. B. (1938). The village and the peasant group. In ShaninT. (Ed.), Peasants and peasant society (1971, pp. 49–68). Penguin Books.
4.
AyroutH. B. (1963). The Egyptian peasant. Michigan University.
5.
BaileyF. G. (1966). The peasant view of the bad life. In ShaninT. (Ed.), Peasants and peasant society. Penguin Books.
6.
BaskinY. (1997). The work of nature: How the diversity of life sustains us. Ice land Press.
7.
BeteilleA. (1974). Studies in agrarian social structure. Oxford University Press.
8.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice transl. NiceRichard). Cambridge University Press.
9.
ChambersR. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the last first. Intermediate.
10.
ChandR. (2001). Emerging trends and issues in public and private investments in Indian agriculture: A state-wise analysis. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(2), 161–184.
11.
ClokeP. (2005). Conceptualizing rurality. In Cloke & MarsdenT. P (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies. Sage Publication.
12.
ConklinH. C. (1954). An ethno-ecological approach to shifting agriculture. Transactions of New York Academy of Sciences, 17(2), 133–142.
13.
CorbridgeS., & HarrisJ. (2000). Reinventing India: Liberalization, Hindu nationalism and popular democracy. Oxford University Press.
14.
DavisK., & BlakeJ. (1956). Social structure and fertility: Analytical framework. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 4(4), 211–235.
15.
DoveM. (1983). Theories of swidden agriculture and the political economy of ignorance. Agroforestry System, 1(2), 85–99.
16.
DurkheimE. (1893). The division of labour in society. The Free Press.
17.
EdelmanM., & WolfordW. (2017). Critical agrarian studies in theory and practice. Antipode, 49(8), 1–18.
18.
EscobarA. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton University Press.
19.
FergusonJ. (1994). The anti-politic machine: Development, depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. University of Minnesota Press.
20.
GeertzC. (1972). The wet and the dry: Traditional irrigation in Bali and Morocco. Human Ecology, 1(1), 23–39.
21.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of culture: Selected essays. Basic Books, Inc Publishers.
22.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
23.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.
24.
GuptaA. (1998). Postcolonial development: Agriculture in making modern India. Duke University Press.
25.
GururaniS., & GreenbergB. (1997). The new traditionalist discourse of Indian environmentalism. Journal of Peasant Studies, 24(3), 65–99.
26.
HarrisJ. (2011). Reflections on agrarian change in India since independence: Does ‘landlordism’ still matter?Simons papers in security and development. No. 14/2011. School for International Studies. Simon Fraser University.
27.
HarrisM. (1979). Cultural materialism: The struggle for a science of culture. Random House Inc.
28.
HillP. (1982). Dry grain farming families. Cambridge University Press.
29.
JodhkaS. S. (1994). Agrarian change and attached labour: Emerging patterns in Haryana agriculture. Economic and Political Weekly, 29(39), A102–A106.
30.
KohliA. (1987). The state and poverty in India. Cambridge University Press.
31.
KroeberA. D. (1948). Anthropology. Harcourt, Brace & Co. Publication.
32.
KumarR. (2016). Rethinking revolutions: Soyabean, choupals, and the changing countryside in central India. Oxford University Press.
33.
MencherJ. (1978). Agriculture and social structure in Tamil Nadu: Past origins, present transformations and future prospects. Allied Publishers.
34.
MarxK. (1867). Capital: A critique of political economy. Progress Publishers.
35.
NandyA. (1989). Culture, voice and development: A primer for the unsuspecting. In SakamotoYoshikazu (Ed.), The structure of world politics. Theses Eleven.
36.
RaoV. M. (1996). Agricultural development with a human face: Experience and prospects. Economic and Political Weekly, 29(16–17), 16–23.
37.
RichardP. (1989). Agriculture as performance. In ChambersR., PaceyA., & ThruppL. A. (Eds.), Farmer first: Farmer innovation and agricultural research. Intermediate Technology Publication.
38.
RobbP. (1983). Rural India: Land, power and society under British rule. Curzon Press.
39.
RobbP. (1996). Meanings of agriculture: Essays in South Asian history and economics. Oxford University Press.
40.
SchutzA. (1967). Phenomenology of social world. Northwestern University Press.
41.
ScottJ. (1976). The moral economy of the peasant: Rebellion and subsistence in Southeast Asia. Yale University Press.
42.
ScottJ. C. (1998). Seeing like a state. How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
43.
ShaninT. (1971). Peasants and peasant societies: Selected readings. Penguin Books.
44.
SillitoeP. (1998). The development of indigenous knowledge: A new applied anthropology. Current Anthropology, 39(2), 223–252.
45.
SpringerJ. (1991). State power and agricultural transformation in Tamil Nadu. In AgrawalA. & Sivaramakrishnan (Eds.), Agrarian environments: Resources representation and rule in India. Duke University Press.
46.
SrinivasM. N., & BetteilleA. (1964). Networks in Indian social structure. Man, 64, 165–168.
47.
StoneG. D. (2007). Agriculture deskilling and the spread of genetically modified cotton in Warangal. Current Anthropology, 48(1), 67–103.
48.
TanujaP., and VarunG. (2017). Monitoring of cotton crop lands in Odisha using geospatial tools. http://oar.icrisat.org/10402/1/Pragada%20TanujaAndGudla%20Varun.pdf
49.
ThornerD. (1956). The agrarian prospects in India. Allied Publishers.
50.
ThornerA. (1982). Semi-feudalism or capitalism? Contemporary debates on class and mode of production in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 17(50), 1993–1999.
51.
TurnerV. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Aldine De Gruyter.
52.
Van Der PloegJ. D., & LongN. (1994). Born from within: Practice and perspectives of endogenous rural development. Van Gorcum.
53.
VasaviA. R. (1999). Harbingers of rain: Land and life in South India. Oxford University Press.
54.
WolfE. R. (1956). Aspects of group relations in a complex society: Mexico. In ShaninT. (Ed.), Peasants and peasant society. Penguin Books.
