AoA, M. (1972). Problems of re-adjustment to a new situation (with special reference to the Naga tribes). In SinghK. S. (Ed.), The tribal situation in India (pp. 445–452). Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
2.
BoseN. K. (1975). The structure of Hindu society. Orient Longman Ltd.
3.
Brown. (2014). Governmentality in the age of neoliberalism. Lecture at the Pacific Centre for Technology and Culture. http://pactac.net/2014/03/wendy-brown%E2%80%94governmentality-in-the-age-of-neoliberalism/
4.
BrownW. (2005). Critical essays on knowledge and politics. Princeton University Press.
5.
DubeyK. C. (1972). Tribal scene in Madhya Pradesh. Appendix 1. In SinghK. S. (Ed.), The tribal situation in India (pp. 591–606). Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
6.
Government of India. (1955). Adivasis. Ministry of Information and Broadcasting.
7.
HebbarR. (2022). Undoing historical injustice? Critical reflections on India’s Forest Rights Act. Social Change, 52(4), 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/00490857221125562
8.
KoenigsbergerO. H. (1952). New towns in India. The Town Planning Review, 23(2), 94–132.
9.
LongN. (2001). Development sociology: Actor perspectives. Routledge.
10.
MoorthyO. K. (1972). The tribal situation in South India. In SinghK. S. (Ed.), The tribal situation in India (pp. 199–211). Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
11.
Roy BurmanB. K. (1972). Integrated area approach to the problems of the hill tribes of northeast India. In SinghK. S. (Ed.), The tribal situation in India (pp. 67–90). Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
12.
SinghK. S. (1972). The tribal situation in India. Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
13.
Sinha. (1972). Tribal solidarity movements in India: A review. In SinghK. S. (Ed.), The tribal situation in India (pp. 282–394). Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
14.
VidyarthiL. P. (1972). An appraisal of the leadership pattern among the tribes of Bihar. In SinghK. S. (Ed.), The tribal situation in India (pp. 409–424). Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
15.
WaltersW. (2004). Some critical notes on ‘governance’. Studies in Political Economy, 73(1), 27–46.
