This commentary aims to show how the concept of ‘political work’ suggested by Kaveri Haritas (Haritas, 2021, In search of home: Citizenship, law and the politics of the poor) applies to a wide range of contexts and goods and services supposedly provided by the State in India but also elsewhere. The objective is also to outline the contributions of the concept of political work to feminist studies from the perspective of social reproduction theory.
BremanJ., & Van der LindenM. (2014). Informalizing the economy: The return of the social question at a global level. Development and Change, 45(5), 920–940.
4.
DestremauB., & GeorgesI. (Eds.). (2017). Le” care”, face morale du capitalisme: Assistance et police des familles en Amérique latine. Peter Lang.
5.
DuboisV. (2016). The bureaucrat and the poor: Encounters in French welfare offices. Routledge.
6.
ForbessA., JamesD., ThelenT., VettersL., & von Benda-BeckmannK. (2018). Acts of assistance: Navigating the interstices of the British State with the help of non-profit legal advisers. InStategraphy: Toward a relational anthropology of the state (pp. 73–89). Berghahn.
7.
GuérinI., & KumarS. (2017). Market, freedom and the illusions of microcredit. Patronage, caste, class and patriarchy in Rural South India. The Journal of Development Studies, 53(5), 741–754. 0.1080/00220388.2016.1205735
8.
GuérinI., KumarS., VenkatasubramanianG., & VerschuurC. (2021). Resisting the destruction of social reproduction: Dalit women’s struggle in South India. In GuérinI. & HillenkampI. (Eds.), Social reproduction, solidarity economy, feminisms and democracy: Latin America and India (pp. 87–117). Palgrave MacMillan/Springer Nature. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-71531-1
9.
HaritasK. (2021). In search of home: Citizenship, law and the politics of the poor. Cambridge University Press.
10.
KanurakaranK. (2017). Women, microfinance and the state in neo-liberal India. Routledge India.
11.
MohandesiS., & TeitelmanE. (2017). Without reserves. In BhattacharyaT. (Ed.), Mapping social reproduction theory (pp. 37–67). Pluto Press.
12.
MolyneuxM. (2007). Conditional cash transfers: A pathway to women’s empowerment? [Pathways to Women’s Empowerment working paper 5]. Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
13.
PuscedduA. M., LoperfidoG., & NarotzkyS. (2021). The everyday states of austerity: Politics and livelihoods in Europe. Antropologia, 8(3), 7–23.
14.
SchijmanE. (2019). À qui appartient le droit? Ethnographier une économie de pauvreté. Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
15.
ThelenT., VettersL., & von Benda-BeckmannK. (2017). Stategraphy: Toward a relational anthropology of the state (Vol. 4). Berghahn Books.
16.
VerschuurC., GuérinI., & HillenkampI. (Eds.). (2021). Social reproduction, solidarity economy, feminisms and democracy. Palgrave Macmillan.
