This study is an exploratory study of the sisterhood circles among women professionals of the information technology industry. It focused on how the medium of technology helped the women to relate to others, form relations of trust and bond as allies in the virtual world over their common concerns in the real world. Adopting a phenomenological perspective, the research aimed to study the experiences of women sisterhood networks and its impact on their professional lives.
AdlerP., & KwonS. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17–40.
2.
AycockA. (1995). Technologies of the self: Foucault and internet discourse. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 1(2). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1995.tb00328.x
3.
BhandariH., & YasunobuK. (2009). What is social capital: A comprehensive review of the concept. Asian Journal of Social Science, 37, 480–510.
4.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
5.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.
6.
CockburnC.1985. Machinery of dominance: Women, men and technical know-how. Pluto.
7.
CompTIA (2020). IT industry outlook 2020. https://www.comptia.org/content/research/it-industry-trends-analysis
8.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.
9.
CreswellJ. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
10.
DorussenH., LenzH., & BlavoukosS. (2005). Assessing the reliability and validity of expert interviews. European Union Politics, 6, 315–337.
11.
GerhardJ. (2001). Desiring revolution: Second-wave feminism and the rewriting of twentieth-century American sexual thought. Columbia University.
12.
HarawayD. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women. Routledge.
13.
HooksB. (1986). Sisterhood: Political solidarity between women. Feminist Review, 23(1), 125–138.
14.
HooksB. (2000). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. South End.
15.
KabinaT., & BizikP. (2015). Wage index report India: Wages and working conditions in the IT sector wage indicator foundation. http://media.monsterindia.com/logos/research_report/Report_IT_low.pdf
16.
LinN. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge University.
17.
LinN., & EricksonB. H. (2008). Theory, measurement, and the research enterprise on social capital. In LinN. & EricksonB. H. (Ed.), Social Capital: An international research program (pp. 1–24). Oxford University.
18.
LongmanC. (2018). Women’s circles and the rise of the new feminine: Reclaiming sisterhood, spirituality, and wellbeing. Religions, 9(1). https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/9/1/9
19.
LuckmanS. (1999). (En)gendering the digital body: Feminism and the internet. Hecate, 25(2), 36–48.
20.
MannS., & HuffmanD. (2005). The decentering of second wave feminism and the rise of the third wave. Science & Society, 69, 56–91.
21.
McLeanJ. (2020). Feminist digital spaces. In McLeanJ. (Ed.), Changing digital geographies: Technologies, environments and people (pp. 177–201). Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
MieszkowskiK. (1999). Sisterhood is Digital. https://www.fastcompany.com/37554/sisterhood-digital
23.
OuelletteJ. (2016). Enduring affective rhetorics: Transnational feminist action in digital spaces (788). (Doctoral dissertations, University of Massachusetts Amherst). https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/788
24.
PattonM. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. SAGE Publications.
25.
PayneG. T., MooreC. B., GriffisS. E., & AutryC. W. (2011). Multilevel challenges and opportunities in social capital research. Journal of Management, 37(2), 491–520.
26.
PlantS. (1997). Zero and ones: Digital women and the new technoculture. Fourth Estate.
27.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
28.
ReichT., & HershcovisS. (2011). Interpersonal relationships at work. In ZedeckS., AguinisH., CascioW., GelfandM., LeungK., ParkerS., & ZhouJ. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 223–248). American Psychological Association.
29.
RaghuramP., HermanC. B., & EstherS. G. (2018). Women and IT scorecard India-2018. https://www.nasscom.in/knowledge-center/publications/women-and-it-scorecard-india-2018
30.
RoganF., & BudgeonS. (2018). The personal is political: Assessing feminist fundamentals in the digital age. Social Sciences, 7(132). https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/8/132
31.
SandbergS. (2013). Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. Random House Audio.
32.
WajcmanJ. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 143–152.
33.
WajcmanJ. (2013). Technofeminism. Polity.
34.
World Economic Forum (2016). The industry gender gap women and work in the fourth industrial revolution. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_FOJ_Executive_Summary_GenderGap.pdf
35.
ZaslowE. (2018). Moving from sisterhood to girl power. In TravisC. B., WhiteJ. W., RutherfordA., WilliamsW. S., CookS. L. & WycheK. F. (Eds.), APA handbook of the psychology of women: History, theory, and battlegrounds (pp. 47–67). American Psychological Association.
