This article looks at dispossession through four trajectories—segregation/‘untouchables’; eviction/‘encroachers’; de-citizenisation/‘illegal interlopers’; occupation/ ‘anti-nationals’—each of which destabilise the foundational basis of citizenship, and contain gendered reverberations. Violence and structural inequalities lie at the core of state practice, temper constitutional prerogatives and fuel dispossession. Impunity lies at the heart of these processes. Each of these four methods speak to a historical specificity, have distinct consequences and afterlives, different affects and engender distinct modes of resistance. The articulation of the basic idea of dispossession in these terms I argue is itself recall of the tremendous corpus of writing from the borderlands and recall of border imaginings that help us make meaning of territories by dispossession. The four-pronged rupture of constitution-speak jeopardises the constitutional imagination of the nation and affects the very claim to citizenship in the borderlands as set out within the contours the constitution.
AnzalduaG. (1987). Borderlands/La Frontera: The new mestiza. Aunt Lute Books.
2.
BaxiU. (2008). Outline of a ‘theory of practice’ of Indian constitutionalism. In BhargavaR. (Ed.), Politics and ethics of the Indian constitution (pp. 92–118). Oxford University Press.
3.
ButlerJ., & AthanasiouA. (2013). Dispossession: The performative in the political. Polity Press.
4.
ConnellR. W. (1990). The state, gender and sexual politics: Theory and appraisal. Theory and Society. 19(5), 507–544.
5.
DelaneyD. (2003). Law and Nature. Cambridge University Press.
6.
DevyG. (2006). A nomad called thief: Reflections on Adivasi silence. Orient BlackSwan.
7.
DelaneyD. (2005). Territory: A short introduction. Blackwell Publishing.
8.
DuttaA. (2019). What the MP children’s murders tell us about caste and cleanliness. The Wire, 27September.
9.
EnloeC. (2014). Bananas, beaches and bases: Making feminist sense of international politics (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
10.
FinneyC. (2014). Black faces, white spaces: Reimagining the relationship of African Americans to the great outdoors. The University of North Carolina Press.
11.
GanaiN. A. (2019). Is it Kashmirisation of India? Not by any stretch. Outlook, 22December.
12.
GatadeS. (2015). Silencing caste, sanitising oppression: Understanding Swachh Bharat Abhiyan. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(44), 29–35.
13.
HintonA. L. (2002) (Ed.). The dark side of modernity: Toward an anthropology of Genocide. Annihilating difference: The anthropology of genocide (pp. 1–40). University of California Press.
14.
HussainA. (2011). Respected Shobha Rani. In KakS. (Ed.), Until my freedom has come: The new intifada in Kashmir (pp. 94–95). Penguin.
15.
JaawareA. (2018). Practicing caste: On touching and not touching. Fordham University Press.
16.
JayalN. G. (2019a). Faith-based citizenship. www.TheIndiaForum.in. 1November.
17.
JayalN. G. (2019b). The CAA and NRC together will reopen wounds of partition and turn India into a majoritarian state. www.scroll.in. 29December2019.
18.
JonesM. S. (2018). Birthright citizens: A history of race and rights in Antebellum America. Cambridge University Press.
19.
KakS. (2011). The fire is at my heart: Introduction. In Until my freedom has come: The new intifada in Kashmir (pp. 9–24). Penguin.
20.
KannabiranK. (2012). Tools of justice: Non-discrimination and the Indian Constitution. Routledge
21.
KannabiranK. (2019, 23February. Without Land or Recourse. The Hindu.
22.
MamdaniM. (2019). Uncovering the CAA’s larger stratagem. The Hindu, 31December.
23.
MazumdarI. (2016). Unfree mobility: Adivasi women’s migration. In RadhakrishnaM. (Ed.), First citizens: Studies on Adivasis, tribals and indigenous peoples in India (pp. 178–206). Oxford University Press
24.
MirH. (2011). How I became a stone-thrower for a day. In KakSanjay (Ed.), Until my freedom has come: The new intifada in Kashmir (pp. 47–49). Penguin.
25.
PadelF., & DasS. (2016). Bauxite business in Odisha. In SundarNandini (Ed.), The scheduled tribes and their India: Politics, identities, policies and work (pp. 223–253). Oxford University Press.
26.
PetersonV. S. (1992). Security and sovereign states: What is at stake in taking feminism seriously. In Gendered states: Feminist (re)visions of international relations theory. Lynne Reinner.
27.
PuarJ. K. (2017). The right to maim: Debility, capacity, disability. Duke University Press.
28.
RaoS. (1968). The framing of Indian constitution: A study. Indian Institute of Public Administration.
29.
ReardonB. A., & HansA. (2019). Introduction: Challenging patriarchal violence. In ReardonB. A. & HansA. (Eds.), The gender imperative: Human security vs state security (2nd ed., pp. 1–4). Routledge.
30.
RodriguesV. (2008). Citizenship and the Indian constitution. In BhargavaR. (Ed.), Politics and ethics of the Indian constitution (pp. 164–188). Oxford University Press.
31.
RoyA. (2013). Gendered citizenship: Historical and conceptual exploration. Orient BlackSwan.
32.
SamaddarR. (2018). The NRC process and the spectre of statelessness in India. The Wire, 25October2018.
33.
SassenS. (2006). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton University Press.
34.
SibleyD. (1995). Geographies of exclusion: Society and difference in the West. Routledge.
35.
SreenathS. (2019). Numbing machines: Manual scavenging’s reconstitution in 21st century Bengaluru. Economic and political weekly, 54(47), 55–60.
36.
SylvesterC. (2018). Afterwards. In ParasharS., TicknerJ. A., TrueJ. (Eds.), Revisiting gendered states: Feminist imaginings of the state in international relations (pp. 191–196). Oxford University Press.
37.
WilliamsP.J. (1991). The alchemy of race and rights: Diary of a law professor. Harvard University Press.
38.
WilsonB. (2011). Foreword. In RamaswamyG., India stinking: Manual scavengers in Andhra Pradesh. Navayana.
39.
ZiaA. (2019). Resisting disappearance: Military occupation & women’s activism in Kashmir. University of Washington Press.
