The article engages with the literature that has emerged since the 1990s in urban studies in India and in this context, discusses the nature of India’s urban modernity. It suggests that scholars in India participate and engage with the global discussion on urban studies by removing themselves from the epistemic confusions of colonial episteme and of methodological nationalism that has bound sociology in India. It suggests that contemporary processes of capitalism have enveloped the entire territory of the country into an urban space with the mobile upper classes termed ‘middle classes’ and the state policies linking unevenly the so-called rural and urban areas through new forms of capitalist accumulation. These organise specific patterns of spatial inequalities and exclusions and in turn fuel contradictory processes of politics relating to gender, caste, ethnicity and religiosities. The focus of the urban studies should be to analyse the way the global intersects with regions and localities as these are being spatially constituted in the context of uneven urbanisation.
BhanG. & JanaA. (2015). Reading spatial inequality in urban India. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(22), 49–54.
2.
BhideA. (2017). Changing trajectories of local urban governance. In PatelS. & GoyalO. (Eds), The contemporary urban conundrum (pp. 172–183). Delhi: India International Centre Quarterly.
3.
BrennerN. (2014). Introduction. Urban theory without an outside. In BrennerN. (Ed.), Implosions/explosions: Towards a study of planetary urbanization (pp. 14–35). Berlin: Jovis.
DupontV. (2011). The challenge of slums and forced evictions. In ZerahM-H.DupontV. & Lama-RewalS. Tawa (Eds), Urban policies and the right to city in India: Rights, responsibilities and citizenship (pp. 76–97). New Delhi: UNESCO.
6.
FernandesL. (2004). Politics of forgetting. Urban Studies, 41(12), 2415–2430.
7.
Harris-WhiteB. & GooptuN. (2001). Mapping India’s world of unorganised labour. Socialist Register, 37, 89–118.
8.
JanaA. & BhanG. (2013). Of slums or poverty: Notes of caution from 2011 census. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(18), 13–16.
9.
JhaP. (2016). Oxford India short introductions: Labour in contemporary India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
10.
KunduA. (2009). Exclusionary urbanisation in Asia: A macro overview. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(48), 48–58.
11.
KunduA. (2011). Method in madness: Urban data in 2011 census. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(40), 13–16.
12.
KunduA. (2017). Urbanisation versus rurbanisation in India: The need for an alternate development paradigm. IIC Quarterly, (Winter 2016–Spring 2017), 17–27.
13.
McGeeT.G. (2002). Reconstructing ‘The Southeast Asian City’ in an era of volatile globalization. Asian Journal of Social Science, 30(1), 8–27.
14.
MehraA. (2017). India’s ‘urban’ and the policy discontent. In PatelS. & GoyalO. (Eds), The contemporary urban conundrum (pp. 161–171). Delhi: India International Centre Quarterly.
15.
MehtaM. & MehtaD. (2010). A glass half full? Urban development (1990s to 2010). Economic and Political Weekly, 45(28), 20–23.
ParthasarathyD. (2011). Hunters, gatherers and foragers in a metropolis. Commonising the private and the public in Mumbai. Economic and Political Weekly, 56(50), 54–63.
18.
PatelS. (2006). Introduction. An exploration in theory and practice. In PatelS. & DebK. (Eds), Urban studies (pp. 1–38). Delhi: Oxford University Press.
19.
PatelS. (2014). Is there a South perspective to urban studies? In ParnellS. & OldfieldS. (Eds), Routledge handbook on cities of the global South (pp. 37–47). London: Routledge.
20.
PatelS. (2017a). Introduction. Revisiting urban India. In PatelS. & GoyalO. (Eds), The contemporary urban conundrum (pp. 1–16). Delhi: India International Centre Quarterly.
21.
PatelS. (2017b). Colonial modernity and methodological nationalism: The structuring of sociological traditions of India. Sociological Bulletin, 66(2), 125–144.
22.
PatelS. & JadhavV. (2011). Poverty alleviation legislations and intersectional exclusions: An analysis of the limitations of MNREGA and USSWA (CDS-ASSR Project on Social Security). US: Mimeo.
23.
PrakashG. (2002). The urban turn. Sarai Reader 2. Retrieved 7October2017, from http://archive.sarai.net/files/original/b3baf1faf1a4e1098705f8383ae298cd.pdf
24.
RaoV. (2006). Slum as theory: The South/Asian city and globalization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(1), 225–232.
25.
RobinsonJ. (2002). Ordinary cities: Between modernity and development. London: Routledge.
26.
RoyA. (2008). Calcutta requiem: Gender and the politics of poverty. New Delhi: Pearson Education.
27.
ShawA. (2008). Urban policy in post-independent India—An appraisal. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(4), 224–228.
28.
SidhwaniP. (2015). Spatial inequalities in big Indian cities. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(22), 55–62.
29.
SrivastavaS. (2014). Post-nationalism: Urban spaces, consumerism, and middle-class activism in Delhi. In SrivastavaS. (Ed.), Entangled urbanism (pp. 85–111). Delhi: Oxford University Press.
30.
UN-Habitat (2003). The challenge of slums: Global report on human settlements 2003. Nairobi: Author.
31.
VithayathilT. & SinghG. (2012). Spaces of discrimination. Economic & Political Weekly, 47(37), 60–66.
