This qualitative study, employing the Grounded Theory Method, poses a crucial question: Do Iranian women, particularly those of the revolution’s first generation, still adhere to the official religion and its sanctioned religiosity style? The triple coding process of data from 16 semi-structured interviews with women aged 35–45 living in Kerman revealed a significant metamorphosis in their religious meaning system, leading to the construction of ‘reflexive religiosity’ as an alternative to official religiosity. Reflective religiosity, in this context, has been gradually constructed due to Iran’s patriarchal religious and political system and an overarching socio-religious disappointment. This core category represented the construction of a disenchanted worldview, secularized salvation, depoliticalized religion, individualized, self-referential, rationalized, and secular religiosity, emphasizing humanity as the religion. The formation of reflexive religiosity indicates the Islamic Republic’s failure to continue the socialization and meaning-construction process for controlling and keeping women’s bodies and minds docile and obedient.
AfaryJFriedlandR (2018) Critical theory, authoritarianism, and the politics of lipstick from the Weimar Republic to the contemporary Middle East. Critical Research on Religion6(3): 243–268.
2.
AmiriSAsgharpourMA (2015) Emergence of selective religiosity among young girls in Mashhad city: Providing a contextual theory. Social Sciences of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad13(2): 1–22 [in Persian].
3.
ArcherM (2007) Making Our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
ArendtH (1951) The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace.
BeckUBeckE (2012) Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage.
8.
BellahRN (1967) Civil religion in America. Journal of Religion in America96(1): 1–21.
9.
BlaikieN (2000) Designing Social Research: The Logic of Anticipation. New York: Polity Press.
10.
CordesmanA (2009) Iran’s Military Forces in Transition: Conventional Threats and Weapons of Mass Destruction. London: Praeger.
11.
DakakeM (2007) The Charismatic Community: Shi’ite Identity in Early Islam. Albany: State University of New York Press.
12.
ElsterJ (2017) The temporal dimension of reflexivity: Linking reflexive orientations to the stock of knowledge. Journal of Social Theory18(3): 274–293.
13.
GarfinkelH (1984) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
GeertzC (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
15.
GiddensA (1991) Modernity and Self-identity. Cambridge: Polity.
16.
GlaserBStraussA (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
17.
GurrRT (1970) Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
HashemiARanjbarM (2018) The Oral History of Islamic Revolution Committees. Tehran: Islamic Revolution Documentation Center Publications [in Persian].
19.
HassanpourAMemarS (2015) The study of the status of youth religiosity with emphasis on a grounded theory. Iranian Cultural Research Quarterly6: 131–199 [in Persian].
20.
HeelasPWoodheadL (2005) The Spiritual Revolution: Why Religion Is Giving Way to Spirituality?London: Wiley-Blackwell.
21.
KamaliAMohaddesiH (2022) The transformation of religiosity in two generations living in district 4 of Tehran. Sociology of Social Institutions9(19): 35–57 [in Persian].
22.
KarmiMZadsarZ (2012) The relationship between religiosity and Lifestyle. Women’s Quarterly in Culture and Art54(2): 85–101 [in Persian].
Khoshk JanZ (2016) Pilgrimage and its dual functions in Iranian Shiitsm. International Journal of Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage4(5): 1–10.
25.
Khoshk JanZ (2023) Sacred suffering and the construction of political spirituality in the Iranian Shiism discourse. Critical Research on Religion11(2): 171–186.
26.
KitusA (2019) The theory of hegemony: Laclau’s path not taken. Philosophy & Social Criticism46(10): 1225–1243.
27.
LassmanPVelodyI (2015) Max Weber’s ‘Science as a Vocation’. New York: Routledge.
28.
LuckmannT (1967) The Invisible Religion: The Problem of Religion in Modern Society. New York: MacMillan Publishing.
29.
MellorPShillingC (1993) Modernity, self-identity and the sequestration of death. Sociology27(3): 411–431.
30.
MilaniA (2005) King of Shadows: Essays on Iran’s Encounter with Modernity. Los Angeles, CA: Ketab Corp.
31.
MoinB (2000) Khomeini: Life of the Ayatollah. London: Bloomsbury.
32.
MomenM (1985) An Introduction to Shi’i Islam: The History and Doctrines of Twelver Shi’ism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33.
MouffeC (2005) On the Political. New York: Routledge.
34.
NoorbakhshYJafariS (2016) Narrative study of religious lived experiences of students. Bi-Quarterly Scientific Research Journal of Religion and Cultural Policy4(2): 93–126 [in Persian].
35.
SanasarianE (1982) The Women’s Rights Movement in Iran: Mutiny, Appeasement, and Repression from 1900 to Khomeini. New York: Praeger Publishers.
36.
SchmittC (1996) The Concept of the Political (trans. SchwabG). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
ShamsA (2016) Revolutionary religiosity and women’s access to higher education in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies12(1): 126–138.
38.
StraussACorbinJ (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
WeberM (2002) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (trans. ParsonsT). London: Routledge.
40.
ZolghadrRPouafarA (2023) Redefining religion in the daily life of female students in Tehran. Journal of Iran’s Sociology23(4): 68–81 [in Persian].
