Drawing from the utilitarian tradition of economics to propose the leanest formal theoretical models for sociology, “rational choice theory” rejects the Durkheimian interest in society as a reality transcendent of the individual in favour of a revitalization of individualist and rationalist conceptualizations of social order. This theory has, arguably, had one of its strongest substantive applications within the sociology of religion, though Durkheim's focus on the idea that religion is an elementary part of the collective constitution of societies is rejected in favour of the view that religion is just one of many products that can be consumed by individuals as they seek to satisfy their self-interests. In this paper, the fundamentally non-social character of the rational choice approach is examined. Through an examination of the difficulties surrounding the notion of “rationality” and the residual category of the “non-rational” in rational choice models, it will be suggested that it is a reassessment of the Durkheimian tradition rather than a revival of rationalistic utilitarianism that provides a more valuable theoretical direction for the future development of the sociology of religion.
References
1.
Alexander, J.C. (1987) Twenty Lectures. New York: Columbia University Press.
2.
Archer, M. (1995) Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Baert, P. (1998) Social Theory in the Twentieth Century. New York: New York University Press.
4.
Barnes, B. (1995). The Elements of Social Theory. London: UCL Press.
5.
Becker, G. (1975) Human Capital. New York: Columbia University Press.
6.
Becker, G. (1986) “The Economic Approach to Human Behaviour”, in J. Elster (ed.) Rational Choice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
7.
Berthoud, G. (1996) “Le don maussien: origine et fondement”, Revue Européenne des Sciences Sociales34 (105): 163-180.
8.
Blau, P.M. (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley.
9.
Bohman, J. (1991) New Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge: Polity.
10.
Boudon , (1996) “The `Cognitivist Model': A Generalised `Rational Choice Model'”, Rationality and Society8: 123-150.
11.
Bruce, S. (1993) “Religion and Rational Choice: a Critique of Economic Explanations of Religious Behaviour”, Sociology of Religion54: 193-205.
12.
Caillé, A. (1981) “La sociologie de l'intéressante? (à propos de l'utilization du paradigme économique en sociologie)”, Sociologie du Travail3: 257-274.
13.
Caillé, A. (1996) “Ni holisme ni individualisme méthodologiques. Marcel Mauss et le paradigme du don”, Revue Européenne des Sciences Sociales34(105): 181-224.
14.
Camic, C. (1989) “Structure after 50 Years: The Anatomy of a Charter”, American Journal of Sociology95: 38-107.
15.
Champion, F. and Hervieu-Léger, D. (1990) De l'émotion en religion: reconouveaux et traditions. Paris: Centurion.
16.
Chaves, M. (1995) “On the Rational Choice Approach to Religion”, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion34(1): 98-104.
17.
Coleman, J.S. (1979) “Rational Actors in Macrosociological Analysis”, in R. Harrison (ed.) Rational Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Coleman, J.S. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.
19.
Coleman, J.S. and Fararo, T.J. (1992) “Introduction”, in J.S. Coleman and T.J. Fararo (eds) Rational Choice Theory: Advocacy and Critique. London: Sage.
20.
Collins, R. (1988) “The Durkheimian Tradition in Conflict Sociology”, in J. C. Alexander (ed.) Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Collins, R. (1993) “Emotional Energy as the Common Denominator of Rational Action”, Rationality and Society5(2): 203-230.
22.
Collins, R. (1997) “Stark and Bainbridge, Durkheim and Weber: Theoretical Comparisons”, in L.A. Young (ed.) Rational Choice Theory and Religion. New York: Routledge.
23.
Crespi, F. (1992) Social Action and Power. Blackwell: Oxford.
24.
Dayan, D. and Katz, E. (1988) “Articulating Consensus: The Ritual and Rhetoric of Media Events”, in J.C. Alexander (ed.) Durkheimian Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Dobbelaere, K. and Voyé, L. (1990) “From Pillar to Postmodernity: The Changing Situation of Religion in Belgium”, Sociological Analysis, 51 (S): S1-S13.
26.
Douglas, M. and Ney, S. (1998) Missing Persons: A Critique of Personhood in the Social Sciences. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
27.
Durkheim, E. ([1912] 1991) Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Paris: Livre de Poche (Librarie Générale Française).
28.
Durkheim, E. ([1914] 1974) “The Dualism of Human Nature and its Social Conditions”, in R.N. Bellah (ed.) Emile Durkheim on Morality and Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
29.
Ellison, C.G. and Sherkat, D. (1995) “The `Semi-involuntary' Institution Revisited: Religious Variations in Church Participation Among Black Americans”, Social Forces73: 1415-1437.
30.
Elster, J. (1979) Ulysses and the Sirens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Elster, J. (1986) “Introduction”, in J. Elster (ed.) Rational Choice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
32.
Elster, J. (1989a) Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Elster, J. (1989b) The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Elster, J. (1990) “When Rationality Fails”, in K.S. Cook and M. Levi (eds) The Limits of Rationality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
35.
England, P. and Kilbourne, B.S. (1990) “Feminist Critique of the Separatist Model of Self: Implications for Rational Choice Theory”, Rationality and Society2(2): 156-171.
36.
Featherstone, M. (1991) Consumer Culture and Postmodernism. London: Sage.
37.
Finke, R. and Stark, R. (1992) The Churching of America, 1776-1990. Winners and Losers in Our Religious Economy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
38.
Gane, M. (1983) “Durkheim: The Sacred Language”, Economy and Society12(1): 1-47.
39.
Gane, M. (1988) On Durkheim's Rules of Sociological Method. London: Routledge.
40.
Goldthorpe, J.H. (1998) “Rational Action Theory for Sociology”, British Journal of Sociology49(2): 167-192.
41.
Hardin, R. (1982) “Collective Action as an Agreeable n-Prisoner's Dilemma”, in Rational Man and Irrational Society. London: Sage.
42.
Hollis, M. (1987). The Cunning of Reason. Cambridge: C.U.P.
43.
Homans, G. (1958) “Social Behaviour as Exchange”, American Journal of Sociology65: 597-606.
44.
Homans, G. (1961) Social Behaviour: Its Elementary Forms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
45.
Iannaccone, L.R. (1995) “Voodoo Economics? Reviewing the Rational Choice Approach to Religion”, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion34(1): 76-88.
46.
Iannaccone, L.R. (1997) “Rational Choice: Framework for the Scientific Study of Religion”, in L.A. Young (ed.) Rational Choice Theory and Religion. New York: Routledge.
47.
Joas, H. (1996) The Creativity of Social Action. Cambridge: Polity.
48.
Lambert, Y. (1992). “Les religions commes systèmes de maximisation”, Social Compass, 39(1): 133-145.
49.
Levine, D. (1995) Visions of the Sociological Tradition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
50.
Lindholm, C. (1990) Charisma. Oxford: Blackwell.
51.
Lukes, S. (1970) “Some Problems about Rationality”, in B.R. Wilson (ed.) Rationality. Oxford: Blackwell.
52.
Lundby, K. (1997) “The Web of Collective Representations”, in S.M. Hoover and K. Lundby (eds) Rethinking Media, Religion, and Culture. London: Sage.
53.
MacIntyre, A. (1970) “The Idea of a Social Science”, in B.R. Wilson (ed.) Rationality. Oxford: Blackwell.
54.
Maffesoli, M. (1996) The Time of the Tribes. London: Sage.
55.
Martín-Barbero, J. (1997) “Mass Media as a Site of Resacralisation of Contemporary Cultures”, in S.M. Hoover and K. Lundby (eds) Rethinking Media, Religion, and Culture. London: Sage.
56.
Mauss, M. (1954) The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Primitive Societies. London: Cohen & West.
57.
Mellor, P.A. (1998) “Sacred Contagion and Social Vitality: Collective Effervescence in Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse”, Durkheimian Studies/Etudes Durkheimiennes4: 87-114.
58.
Mellor, P.A. and Shilling, C. (1997) Re-forming the Body: Religion, Community and Modernity. London: Sage/TCS.
59.
Mellor, P.A. and Shilling, C. (1998) “Lorsque l'on jette de l'huile sur le feu ardent: secularisation, homo duplex et retour du sacré”, Social Compass45(2): 297-320.
Mooney Marini, M. (1992) “The Role of Models of Purposive Action in Sociology”, in J.S. Coleman and T.J. Fararo (eds) Rational Choice Theory. London: Sage.
62.
Mouzelis, N. (1995) Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong?London: Routledge.
63.
Neitz, M.J. and Mueser, P.R. (1997) “Economic Man and the Sociology of Religion: A Critique of the Rational Choice Approach”, in L.A. Young (ed.) Rational Choice Theory and Religion. New York: Routledge.
64.
Nisbet, R. ([1966] 1993) The Sociological Tradition. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
65.
Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66.
Parsons, T. ([1937] 1968) The Structure of Social Action. New York: Free Press.
67.
Parsons, T. (1979) “Religious and Economic Symbolism in the Western World”, Sociological Inquiry49: 1-48.
68.
Robertson, R. (1992) “The Economisation of Religion? Reflections on the Promise and Limitations of the Economic Approach”, Social Compass39(1): 147-157.
69.
Robertson, R. and Turner, B.S. (1991) “An Introduction to Talcott Parsons: Theory, Politics and Humanity”, in R. Robertson and B.S. Turner (eds) Talcott Parsons: Theorist of Modernity. London: Sage.
70.
Scheff, T.J. (1992) “Rationality and Emotion: Homage to Norbert Elias”, in J. S. Coleman and T.J. Fararo (eds) Rational Choice Theory. London: Sage.
71.
Scott, J. (1995) Sociological Theory: Contemporary Debates. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
72.
Sherkat, D.E. (1997) “Embedding Religious Choices: Preferences and Social Constraints into Rational Choice Theories of Behaviour”, in L. A. Young (ed.) Rational Choice Theory and Religion. New York: Routledge.
73.
Simon, H.A. (1983) Reason in Human Affairs. Oxford: Blackwell.
74.
Spickard, J.V. (1998) “Rethinking Religious Social Action: What is “Rational” about Rational-Choice Theory?”, Sociology of Religion, 59 (2): 99-116.
75.
Stark, R. (1991) “Normal Revelations: A Rational Choice Model of `Mystical' Experiences”, in D.G. Bromley (ed.) Religion and Social Order, Vol. 1, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
76.
Stark, R. (1997) “Bringing Theory Back In”, in L.A. Young (ed.) Rational Choice Theory and Religion. New York: Routledge.
77.
Stark, R. and Bainbridge, W.S. (1985) The Future of Religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.
78.
Stark, R. and Bainbridge, W.S. (1987) A Theory of Religion. New York: Peter Lang.
79.
Stark, R. and Bainbridge, W.S. (1996) Religion, Deviance and Social Control. London: Routledge.
80.
Tiryakian, E. (1995) “Collective Effervescence, Social Change and Charisma: Durkheim, Weber and 1989”, International Sociology10(3): 269-281.
81.
Tuck, R. (1979) “Is There a Free-rider Problem, and If So, What Is it?”, in R. Harrison (ed.) Rrational Action. Studies in Philosophy and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82.
Voyé, L. (1992) “Religion et économie: apports et limites de l'analyse du religieux à partir de cadres théoretiques empruntés à l'économie”, Social Compass39(1): 159-169.
83.
Warner, R.S. (1993) “Work in Progress Toward a New Paradigm for the Sociological Study of Religion in the United States”, American Journal of Sociology98(5): 1044-1093.
84.
Warner, R.S. (1997) “Convergence Toward the New Paradigm: A Case of Induction”, in L.A. Young (ed.) Rational Choice Theory and Religion. New York: Routledge.
85.
Weber, M. ([1922] 1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, eds G. Roth and C. Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.
86.
Wrong, D.H. (1961) “The Oversocialized Conception of Man in Modern Sociology”, American Sociological Review26(2): 183-192.
87.
Wrong, D.H. (1994) The Problem of Order: What Unites and Divides Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
88.
Young, L.A. (1997). “Introduction”, in L.A. Young (ed.) Rational Choice Theory and Religion. New York: Routledge.
