BACK, K. W.
(1951) "Influence through social communication."J. of Abnormal and Soc. Psych.46: 9-23.
2.
BETTENHAUSEN, K.
and J. MURNIGHAN (1985) "The emergence of norms in competitive decision making groups."Admin. Sci. Quarterly30: 350-372.
3.
CATTELL, R. B.
(1948) "Concepts and methods in the measurement of group syntality."Psych. Rev.55: 48-63.
4.
DEEP, S. D.
, B. M. BASS, and J. A. VAUGHAN (1967) "Some effects on business gaming of previous quasi-t group affiliations."J. of Appl. Psych.51: 426-431.
5.
EDDY, W. B.
(1985) The Manager and the Working Group. NY: Prager.
6.
FESTINGER, L.
, S. SCHACHTER and K. BACK (1950) Social Pressures in Informal Groups. NY: Harper & Row.
7.
FRY, C. L.
(1965) "Personality and acquisition factors in the development of coordination strategy."J. of Personality and Soc. Psych.2: 403-407.
8.
GENTRY, J. W.
(1980) "Group size and attitudes toward the simulation experience."Simulation & Games11: 451-460.
9.
GOLDMAN, M.
(1965) "A comparison of individual and group performance forvarying combinations of initial ability."J. of Personality and Soc. Psych.1: 210-216.
10.
GOOD, L. R.
and D. A. NELSON (9171) "Effects of person-group and intra-group attitude similarity on perceived group attractiveness and cohesiveness."Psychonomic Sci.25: 215-217.
11.
GOSENPUD, J.
, P. MIESING and C. J. MILTON (1984) "A research study on strategic decisions in a business simulation," pp. 161-165 in D. M. Currie and J. W. Gentry (eds.) Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises. Stillwater: Oklahoma State University.
12.
GOSENPUD, J.
, C. MILTON, and A. LARSON (1985) "Predicting performance over the course of the simulation," pp. 5-10 in J. W. Gentry and A. C. Burns (eds.) Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises. Stillwater: Oklahoma State University.
13.
GOURAN, D. S.
(1982) Making Decisions in Groups: Choices and Consequences. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
14.
HENSHAW, R. C.
and J. R. JACKSON (1972) The Executive Game. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
15.
HSU, T.
(1984) "A further test of the group formation and its impacts in a simulated business environment," pp. 6-9. in D. M. Currie and J. W. Gentry (eds.) Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises. Stillwater: Oklahoma State University.
16.
JENSEN, R. L.
and D. J. CHERRINGTON (1977) The Business Management Laboratory. Dallas: Business Publications.
17.
KERLINGER, F. N.
(1986) Foundations of Behavioral Research. NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
18.
LAUGHLIN, P. R.
, L. G. BRANCH, and H. H. JOHNSON (1969) "Individual versus triadic performance on a unidimensional complementary task as a function of initial ability level."J. of Personality and Soc. Psych.12: 144-150.
19.
LEANA, C. R.
(1985) "A partial test of Janis' group think model: effects of group cohesiveness and leader behavior on defective decision making."J. of Management11: 5-17.
20.
McFARLIN, F. W.
, J. L. McKENNEY, and J. A. SEILER (1970) The Management Game: Simulated Decision Making. NY: Macmillan.
21.
McKENNEY, J. L.
and W. R. DILL (1966) "Influences on learning simulation games."Amer. Behav. Scientist10: 28-32.
22.
MIESING, P.
and J. F. PREBLE (1985) "Group processes and performance in a complex business simulation."Small Group Behavior16: 325-338.
23.
MYERS, A. E.
(1962) "Team competition, success, and the adjustment of group members."J. of Abnormal and Soc. Psych.65: 325-332.
24.
NORRIS, D. R.
and R. E. NIEBUHR (1980) "Group variables and gaming success."Simulation & Games11: 301-312.
25.
SCHEFFE, H.
(1959) The Analysis of Variance. NY: John Wiley.
26.
SCOTT, C. R.
and A. J. STRICKLAND (1980) Tempomatic IV: A Managenment Simulation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
27.
SEASHORE, S.
(1954) Group Cohesiveness in the Industrial Work Group. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
28.
SHAW, M. E.
(1959) "Some effects of individually prominent behavior upon group effectiveness and member satisfaction."J. of Abnormal and Soc. Psych.59: 382-386.
29.
SHAW, M. E.
(1960) "A note concerning homogeneity of membership and group problem solving."J. of Abnormal and Soc. Psych.60: 448-450.
30.
SHAW, M. E.
(1981) Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior. NY: McGraw-Hill.
31.
SHAW, M. E.
and L. M. SHAW (1962) "Some effects of sociometric grouping upon learning in a second grade classroom."J. of Soc. Psych.57 (second half): 453-458.
32.
SHERIF, M.
(1967) Group Conflict and Co-Operation: Their Social Psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
33.
SMELSER, W. T.
(1961) "Dominance as a factor in achievement and perception in cooperative problem solving interactions."J. of Abnormal and Soc. Psych.62: 535-542.
34.
THIBAUT, J. W.
and L. H. STRICKLAND (1956) "Psychological set and social conformity."J. of Personality25: 115-129.
35.
VANCE, S. C.
and C. F. GRAY (1967) "Use of a performance evaluation model for research in business gaming."Academy of Management J.10: 27-37.
36.
WOLFE, J.
(1978) "Correlations between academic achievement, aptitude, and business game performance," pp. 316-324 in D. C. Brenenstuhl and S. C. Certo (eds.) Exploring Experiential Learning: Simulations and Experiential Exercises. Tempe: Arizona State University.
37.
WOLFE, J.
(1978) "The effects of game complexity on the acquisition of business policy knowledge."Decision Sci.9: 143-155.
38.
WOLFE, J.
, D. D. BOWEN, and C. R. ROBERTS (1987) "A longitudinal study of T-group effects on team performance." Working paper. University of Tulsa.
39.
WOLFE, J.
and T. I. CHACKO (1983) "Team-size effects on business game performance and decision-making behaviors."Decision Sci.14: 121-133.
40.
WOLFE, J.
and C. R. ROBERTS (1985-1986) "The effects of different grade weights on business game learning levels."J. of Educ. Technology Systems. 14: 307-316.
41.
ZANDER, A.
(1968) "Group aspirations," pp. 418-429 in D. Carwright and A. Zander (eds.) Group Dynamics: Research and Theory. New York: Harper & Row.
42.
ZANDER, A.
and H. MEDOW (1963) "Individual and group levels of aspiration."Human Relations16: 89-105.
43.
ZANDER, A.
and T. NEWCOMB, Jr. (1967) "Group levels of aspiration in United Fund campaigns."J. of Personality and Soc. Psych.6: 157-162.