For an interactive simulation of 7 degree-of freedom redundant manipulator under teleoperation, this paper describes an iterative form of resolved-motion rate control in which the constraint Jacobian is constructed on-line in real time and used in the pseudoinverse method as the manipulator is teleoperated. The manipulator's tasks may involve trajectory following in free space and frequent contact with the environment through pick-and-put operation. The operator's command is interpreted as a series of increments in Cartesian space, and then the constraint Jacobian is developed between two successive increments by viewing the predecessor as the initial configuration and the successor as the target configuration. The pseudoinverse of the constraint Jacobian then generates necessary changes in joint variables and subsequently joint torque. The Jacobian constructed in this way enables us to treat both free motion and environmental contact in the same way. The simulator is built on a two-processor IRIS workstation, with one processor for graphics and the other for dynamics and control analysis. This simulator has a potential for training the teleoperator, developing operational scenarios through visualization of the simulation, and testing the design of operator-machine interface.
Vertut, J. and P. Coiffet.1986, "Teleoperations and Robotics: Evolution and Development," in Robot Technology , Prentice-Hall.
2.
Sheridan, T.B.1984, "Telerobotics," Automatica, 25(4), pp. 487-507.
3.
Stark et al. 1987, "Telerobotics: Display, Control, and Communication Problem ," IEEE J. Robotics and Automation, RA-3(1), pp. 67-75.
4.
C.W. Wampler .1986, "Manipulator Inverse Kinematic Solutions Based on Vector Formulations and Damped Least-Squares Methods," IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-16(1), pp. 93-101.
5.
E.J. Haug.1989, Computer Aided Kinematics and Dynamics of Mechanical Systems, Volume I: Basic Methods, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
6.
Chem, S.T.P. ; K.H. Yae, T.C. Lin, "An Application of the Constraint Jacobian to Teleoperation of a Redundant Manipulator," to appear in Int. J. Robotics & Automation.
7.
Nenchev, D.N.1989, "Redundancy Resolution through Local Optimization: A Review," J. Robotic Sys., 6(6), pp. 769-798.
8.
Bae, D.S. and E.J. Haug.1987, "A Recursive Formulation for Constrained Mechanical System Dynamics: Part I. Open Loop System, Part II. Closed Loop System," Mechanics of Structures and Machines, 15(4), pp. 359-382, 481-506.
9.
Bae, D.S.; R.S. Hwang, E.J. Haug.1991, "A Recursive Formulation for Real-Time Dynamics Simulations ," ASME J. Mechanical Design, 113, pp. 158-166.
10.
Tsai, F.F. and E.J. Haug.1991, "Real-Time Multibody System Dynamic Simulation Part I: A Modified Recursive Formulation and Topological Analysis, Part II: A Parallel Algorithm and Numerical Results," Mechanics of Structures and Machines, 19(1,2), pp. 99-127,129162.
11.
Lin, T.C. and K.H. Yae.1991, "The Effects of Harmonic Drive Gears on Robotic Dynamics," ASME 1991 Advances in Design Automation, DE-Vol. 32-2, pp. 515-522.
12.
Lin, T.C. and K.H. Yae.1993, "Recursive Dynamic Formulation of a Manipulator Driven by Harmonic Drives," to appear in Mechanics of Structures and Machines.
Wittenburg, J.1977, Dynamics of Systems of Rigid Bodies, B. G. Teubner, Stuttgart .
15.
Haug, E.J. and M.K. McCullough.1986, "A Variational-Vector Calculus Approach to Machine Dynamics," ASME J. Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design, 108, pp. 25-30.
16.
Paul, R.P.1981, Robot Manipulators: Mathematics, Programming, and Control , The MIT Press.
17.
Lin, T.C. and K.H. Yae.1990, "Recursive Linearization and Multibody Dynamics and Application to Control Design," Proceedings, ASME 1990 Advances in Design Automation, DE-Vol. 23-2, pp. 341-348 and to appear in ASME J. Mechanical Design.
18.
Asada, H. and J.-J.E. Slotine .1986, Robot Analysis and Control , John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
19.
Rao, C.R. and S.K. Mitra.1971, Generalized Inverse of Matrices and its Applications, John Wiley & Sons.
20.
Klein, C.A. and C.H. Huang.1983, "Review of Pseudoinverse Control for Use with Kinematically Redundant Manipulators," IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC13(3), pp. 245-250.
21.
Hannaford, B. and R. Anderson.1988, "Experimental and Simulation Studies of Hard Contact in Force Reflecting Teleoperation," Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation.
22.
Dubetz, M.W.;J.G. Kuhl; E.J. Haug.1988, "A Network Implementation of Real Time Dynamics Simulation with Interactive Animated Graphics," Proceedings of the 12th ASME Design Automation Conference, pp. 509-518.
23.
Chang, J.L. and S.S. Kim.1989, "A Low-Cost Real-Time Man-in-the-Loop Simulation for Multibody Systems," Proceedings of the 12th ASME Design Automation Conference, pp. 95-99.
24.
Chang, J.L.; T.C. Lin;K.H. Yae.1989, "Man-in-the-Control-Loop Simulation for Manipulators," Proceedings of The 3rd Annual Conference on Aerospace Computational Control, pp. 688-699.
25.
Christiansen, H.N.1987, MOVIE.BYU Training Text, Bookcrafters.
26.
Whitney, D.E.1969, "Resolved motion rate control of manipulators and human prostheses," IEEE Trans. Man-Machine Systems, MMC-10, pp. 47-53.
