Autonomous systems are soon expected to integrate into our lives as home assistants, delivery drones, and driverless cars. Given the importance of cybersecurity of these systems, game-theoretic solutions provide a mathematical modeling of the interaction between malicious users and the system. This work introduces a novel framework for analyzing potential denial of service (DoS) attacks on autonomous vehicular networks by integrating a non-cooperative, non-zero-sum game model with a comprehensive simulation environment (VEINS/OMNET++/SUMO). Our key contribution lies in the systematic quantification of attacker and defender payoffs based on realistic network metrics, enabling the identification of optimal strategies across 21 distinct attack/defense scenarios derived from tunable network parameters. We specifically emphasize the model’s ability to provide a predictive, all-scenario evaluation to aid system designers in preparing for real-time cyber attacks on driverless cars.
HamiltonSNMillerWLOttA, et al. Challenges in applying game theory to the domain of information warfare. In: Information survivability workshop (ISW), pp. 1–4. State College, PA: Citeseer.
PitaJTambeMKiekintveldC, et al. Guards: game theoretic security allocation on a national scale. In: The 10th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems-volume 1, Taipei, 2–6 May 2011, pp. 37–44. Richland, SC: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
6.
JahanFSunWNiyazQ, et al. Security modeling of autonomous systems: a survey. ACM Comput Surv2019; 52: 1–34.
7.
SommerCGermanRDresslerF.Bidirectionally coupled network and road traffic simulation for improved IVC analysis. IEEE Trans Mob Comput2010; 10: 3–15.
8.
VargaAHornigR.An overview of the OMNeT++ simulation environment. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on simulation tools and techniques for communications, networks and systems & workshops, Marseille, 3–7 March 2008, pp. 1–10. Brussels: ICST.
9.
LopezPABehrischMBieker-WalzL, et al. Microscopic traffic simulation using SUMO. In: The 21st IEEE international conference on intelligent transportation systems, Maui, HI, 4–7 November 2018, pp. 2575–2582. New York: IEEE.
10.
XuZZhuQ. A cyber-physical game framework for secure and resilient multi-agent autonomous systems. In: 2015 54th IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC), Osaka, Japan, 15–18 December 2015, pp. 5156–5161. New York: IEEE.
11.
FerdowsiAChallitaUSaadW, et al. Robust deep reinforcement learning for security and safety in autonomous vehicle systems. In: 2018 21st international conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), Maui, HI, 4–7 November 2018, pp. 307–312. New York: IEEE.
12.
FerdowsiASaadWMandayamNB. Colonel blotto game for secure state estimation in interdependent critical infrastructure. arXiv. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv1709.09768.
13.
FangSHangPWeiC, et al. Cooperative driving of connected autonomous vehicles in heterogeneous mixed traffic: a game theoretic approach. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–15.
14.
ChanKHZilbermanSPolancoN, et al. Safedriverl: combining non-cooperative game theory with reinforcement learning to explore and mitigate human-based uncertainty for autonomous vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 19th international symposium on software engineering for adaptive and self-managing systems, Lisbon, 19–16 April 2024, pp. 214–220. New York: ACM.
15.
GuoCZhuTGuoB, et al. Optimal strategy for moving target defense on the internet of vehicles based on game theory and reinforcement learning. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. Epub ahead of print 26August2025. DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2025.3602902.
16.
TusharWYuenCSahaTK, et al. A survey of cyber-physical systems from a game-theoretic perspective. IEEE Access2023; 11: 9799–9834.
17.
XuZZhuQ.A game-theoretic approach to secure control of communication-based train control systems under jamming attacks. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on safe control of connected and autonomous vehicles, Pittsburgh, PA, 19–21 April 2017, pp. 27–34. New York: ACM.
18.
SanjabASaadWBaşarT. Prospect theory for enhanced cyber-physical security of drone delivery systems: a network interdiction game. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), Paris, 21–25 May 2017, pp. 1–6. New York: IEEE.
19.
WangKDuMMaharjanS, et al. Strategic honeypot game model for distributed denial of service attacks in the smart grid. IEEE Trans Smart Grid2017; 8: 2474–2482.
20.
AttiahAChatterjeeMZouCC.A game theoretic approach to model cyber attack and defense strategies. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), Kansas City, MO, 20–24 May 2018, pp. 1–7. New York: IEEE.
21.
BaiYFanKZhangK, et al. Blockchain-based trust management for agricultural green supply: a game theoretic approach. J Clean Prod2021; 310: 127407.
22.
LiuXZhangJZhuP, et al. Quantitative cyber-physical security analysis methodology for industrial control systems based on incomplete information bayesian game. Comput Sec2021; 102: 102138.
23.
LakshminarayanaSBelmegaEVPoorHV.Moving-target defense against cyber-physical attacks in power grids via game theory. IEEE Trans Smart Grid2021; 12: 5244–5257.
24.
FloreaRCrausM.A game-theoretic approach for network security using honeypots. Future Internet2022; 14: 362.
25.
KhouryJNassarM. A hybrid game theory and reinforcement learning approach for cyber-physical systems security. In: NOMS 2020-2020 IEEE/IFIP network operations and management symposium, Budapest, 20–24 April 2020, pp. 1–9. New York: IEEE.
26.
WangZShenHZhangH, et al. Optimal DoS attack strategy for cyber-physical systems: a stackelberg game-theoretical approach. Inf Sci2023; 642: 119134.
27.
HoERajagopalanASkvortsovA, et al. Game theory in defence applications: a review. Sensors2022; 22: 1032.
28.
WuQShivaSRoyS, et al. On modeling and simulation of game theory-based defense mechanisms against DoS and DDoS attacks. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Spring simulation multiconference. society for computer simulation international, Orlando, FL, 11–15 April 2010, p. 159. San Diego, CA: Society for Computer Simulation International.
29.
BediHSRoySShivaS. Game theory-based defense mechanisms against DDoS attacks on TCP/TCP-friendly flows. In: 2011 IEEE symposium on computational intelligence in cyber security (CICS), Paris, 11–15 April 2011, pp. 129–136. New York: IEEE.
30.
SpyridopoulosTKaranikasGTryfonasT, et al. A game theoretic defence framework against DoS/DDoS cyber attacks. Comput Sec2013; 38: 39–50.
31.
WangYZhangYZhangL, et al. (eds) Game based DDoS attack strategies in cloud of things. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on information engineering for mechanics and materials, Dordrecht: Atlantis Press, 2016, pp. 759–762.
32.
MichalasAKomninosNPrasadNR. Multiplayer game for DDoS attacks resilience in ad hoc networks. In: 2011 2nd international conference on wireless communication, vehicular technology, information theory and aerospace & electronic systems technology (wireless VITAE), Chennai, India, 3 March 2011, pp. 1–5. New York: IEEE.
33.
MichalasAKomninosNPrasadN.Cryptographic puzzles and game theory against DoS and DDoS attacks in networks. Int J Comput Res2012; 19: 79.
34.
ChowdharyAPisharodySAlshamraniA, et al. Dynamic game based security framework in SDN-enabled cloud networking environments. In: Proceedings of the ACM international workshop on security in software defined networks & network function virtualization, Scottsdale, AZ, 24 March 2017, pp. 53–58. New York: ACM.
35.
YanGLeeRKentA, et al. Towards a Bayesian network game framework for evaluating DDoS attacks and defense. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM conference on computer and communications security, Raleigh, NC, 16–18 October 2012, pp. 553–566. New York: ACM.
36.
WrightMVenkatesanSAlbaneseM, et al. Moving target defense against DDoS attacks: an empirical game-theoretic analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM workshop on moving target defense, Vienna, 24 October, 2016, pp. 93–104. New York: ACM.
37.
KandoussiEMEl MirIHaniniM, et al. Modeling an anomaly-based intrusion prevention system using game theory. In: AbrahamAHaqiqAMudaA, et al. (eds) International conference on innovations in bio-inspired computing and applications. Cham: Springer, 2018, pp. 266–276.
38.
BukharovEZybinDSolovievA, et al. Mathematical simulation of countermeasures to attacks of “denial of service” type with the use of game theory approach. J Phys Conf Ser2019; 1203: 012076.
39.
WahabOABentaharJOtrokH, et al. Optimal load distribution for the detection of VM-based DDoS attacks in the cloud. IEEE Trans Serv Comput2017; 13: 114–129.
40.
SubbaBBiswasSKarmakarS.A game theory based multi layered intrusion detection framework for wireless sensor networks. Int J Wirel Inf Netw2018; 25: 399–421.
41.
NarwalPSinghSNKumarD. Game-theory based detection and prevention of DoS attacks on networking node in open stack private cloud. In: 2017 international conference on infocom technologies and unmanned systems (trends and future directions)(ICTUS), Dubai, 18–20 December 2017, pp. 481–486. New York: IEEE.
42.
De AssisMVHamamotoAHAbrãoT, et al. A game theoretical based system using holt-winters and genetic algorithm with fuzzy logic for DoS/DDoS mitigation on SDN networks. IEEE Access2017; 5: 9485–9496.
43.
GaoLLiYZhangL, et al. Research on detection and defense mechanisms of DoS attacks based on bp neural network and game theory. IEEE Access2019; 7: 43018–43030.
44.
SoloveyRLavrovaD. Game-theoretic approach to self-regulation of dynamic network infrastructure to protect against cyber attacks. In: 2020 international scientific and technical conference modern computer network technologies (MONETEC), Moscow, 27–29 October, 2020, pp. 1–7. New York: IEEE.
45.
HeQWangCCuiG, et al. A game-theoretical approach for mitigating edge DDoS attack. IEEE Trans Dependable Secure Comput2021; 19: 2333–2348.
46.
WangTLaiZYuW, et al. Research on the mechanism of cooperative defense against DDoS attacks based on game theory. In: HsuCHXuMCaoH, et al. (eds) International conference on big data intelligence and computing. Singapore: Springer, 2023, pp. 194–203.
47.
DahiyaAGuptaBB.A reputation score policy and bayesian game theory based incentivized mechanism for DDoS attacks mitigation and cyber defense. Future Gener Comput Syst2021; 117: 193–204.
48.
WuGLiZYaoL. DoS mitigation mechanism based on non-cooperative repeated game for SDN. In: 2018 IEEE 24th international conference on parallel and distributed systems (ICPADS), Singapore, 11–13 December 2018, pp. 612–619. New York: IEEE.
49.
IlavendhanASaruladhaK.A zero-sum game-based security algorithm against DoS attack in vanets. Int J Sci Technol Res2020; 9: 4830–4834.
50.
MairajAJavaidAY.Game theoretic solution for an unmanned aerial vehicle network host under DDoS attack. Comput Netw2022; 211: 108962.
51.
LuXZhaoHLiC, et al. A game-theoretic approach on conflict resolution of autonomous vehicles at unsignalized intersections. IEEE Trans Intel Transp Syst2023; 24: 12535–12548.
52.
MoudoudHAbouElHoudaZBrikB.Advancing security and trust in WSNS: a federated multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Trans Consum Electron2024; 70: 6909–6918.
53.
MoudoudHAbouElHoudaZBrikB.Reputation-aware scheduling for secure internet of drones: a federated multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2024-IEEE conference on computer communications workshops(INFOCOM WKSHPS), Vancouver, BC, 20 May 2024, pp. 1–6. New York: IEEE.
54.
AbouElHoudaZBrikBKsentiniA, et al. When federated learning meets game theory: a cooperative framework to secure IIOT applications on edge computing. IEEE Trans Ind Inform2022; 18: 7988–7997.
55.
AbouElHoudaZMoudoudHBrikB.Federated deep reinforcement learning for efficient jamming attack mitigation in o-ran. IEEE Trans Veh. Technol2024; 73: 9334–9343.
56.
JahanFSunWNiyazQ. A non-cooperative game based model for the cybersecurity of autonomous systems. In: 2020 IEEE security and privacy workshops (SPW), San Francisco, CA, 21 May 2020, pp. 202–207. New York: IEEE.
57.
FCC—wireless telecommunications. Dedicated short range communications (DSRC) service, 2019, https://tinyurl.com/yb72km89
58.
KenneyJB.Dedicated short-range communications (DSRC) standards in the United States. Proc IEEE2011; 99: 1162–1182.
59.
SommerCTonguzOKDresslerF. Adaptive beaconing for delay-sensitive and congestion-aware traffic information systems. In: 2010 IEEE vehicular networking conference, Jersey City, NJ, 13–15 December 2010, pp. 1–8. New York: IEEE.
60.
McKelvey RichardDMcLennan AndrewMTheodoreTL. Gambit: software tools for game theory, version 16.0.1, 2016, http://www.gambit-project.org
61.
BiswasSMišićJMišićV. DDoS attack on WAVE-enabled VANET through synchronization. In: 2012 IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM), Anaheim, CA, 03–07 December 2012, pp 1079–1084. New York: IEEE.
62.
MughalBMWaganAAHasbullahH. Impact of safety beacons on the performance of vehicular ad hoc networks. In: ZainJMWan MohdWMBEl-QawasmehE. (eds) International conference on software engineering and computer systems. Heidelberg, Springer, 2011, pp. 368–383.
63.
ABC News. Berlin artist uses handcart full of smartphones to trick google maps’ traffic algorithm into thinking there is traffic jam, 2020, https://tinyurl.com/3mjeu84m
