This paper highlights the renewal and restructuring period for SIMULATION: Transactions of the Society for Modeling and Simulation (SCS) between 2008 and 2016. Following a retrospective review of the author’s formative years, evolving research interests, and continuing academic journey, the rationale for reorganizing the journal is examined in the context of the evolving professional realm of Modeling and Simulation (M&S). The alignment of the profession, developments in the broader M&S domain, and related SCS initiatives are discussed. The simulation discipline is viewed as a dynamic adaptive innovation ecosystem that brings the principles of the science of complexity to bear on the challenges to its resilience and vitality. The innovation dynamics and complexity perspectives imply future aspirations for the M&S discipline based on recent technological advancements, emerging trends in the scientific culture, and evolving societal demands.
YilmazL. A complexity and creative innovation dynamics perspective to sustaining the growth and vitality of the M&S profession. In: TolkAÖrenT (eds) The profession of modeling and simulation: discipline, ethics, education, vocation, societies, and economics. New York: Wiley, 2017, pp. 209–222.
2.
CsikszentmihalyiM. The systems model of creativity: the collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Cham: Springer, 2015.
3.
YilmazLLiuB. Model credibility revisited: concepts and considerations for appropriate trust. J Simul2022; 16: 312–325.
4.
YilmazL. Proceedings of the agent-directed simulation symposium: spring simulation multiconference: San Diego, California, USA, April 3-7, 2005 (Simulation series). San Diego, CA: Society for Modeling and Simulation International, 2005, https://books.google.com/books?id=-1w-AAAACAAJ
YilmazLSmithJ. Prelude to the panel on what makes good research in modeling & simulation. In: 2008 Winter simulation conference, Miami, FL, 7–10 December 2008, pp. 671–676. New York: IEEE.
7.
YilmazLDavisPFishwickPA, et al. Panel discussion: what makes good research in modeling and simulation: sustaining the growth and vitality of the M&S discipline. In: 2008 Winter simulation conference, Miami, FL, 7–10 December 2008, pp. 677–688. New York: IEEE.
8.
WaldropMM. Complexity: the emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1993.
ZeiglerBPPraehoferHKimTG. Theory of modeling and simulation. New York: Academic Press, 2000.
11.
YilmazL. Validation and verification of social processes within agent-based computational organization models. Comput Math Organ Theory2006; 12: 283–312.
12.
DavisPKAndersonRH. Improving the composability of department of defense models and simulations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2003.
13.
WeissG. Multiagent systems: a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
14.
YilmazL. On the need for contextualized introspective models to improve reuse and composability of defense simulations. J Def Model Simul2004; 1: 141–151.
15.
YilmazLPaspuletiS. Toward a meta-level framework for agent-supported interoperation of defense simulations. J Def Model Simul2005; 2: 161–175.
16.
BonabeauE. Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2002; 99: 7280–7287.
17.
YilmazLÖrenT. Agent-directed simulation. In: YilmazLÖrenT (eds) Agent-directed simulation and systems engineering. New York: Wiley, 2009, pp. 111–143.
18.
ZeiglerBMuzyAYilmazL. Artificial intelligence in modeling and simulation. In: MeyersR (ed.) Encyclopedia of complexity and system science. Cham: Springer, 2009, pp. 344–368.
19.
ÖrenTINumrichSKUhrmacherAM, et al. Agent directed simulation-challenges to meet defense and civilian requirements. In: Winter simulation conference, vol. 2, Orlando, FL, 10–13 December 2000, pp. 1757–1762. New York: IEEE.
20.
ZhangYÖrenTYilmazL, et al. Guest editorial introduction to the special issue on agent-directed simulation. Int J Intell Control Syst2009; 14: 1–3.
21.
ZhangYYilmazLÖrenT, et al. Guest editorial introduction to the special issue on agent-directed simulation. Comput Math Organ Theory2012; 18: 375–379.
22.
YilmazLÖrenT. Dynamic model updating in simulation with multimodels: a taxonomy and a generic agent-based architecture. Simul Ser2004; 36: 3.
YilmazL. Reproducibility in M&S research: issues, strategies and implications for model development environments. J Exp Theor Artif Intell2012; 24: 457–474.
26.
YilmazLÖrenT. Toward replicability-aware modeling and simulation: changing the conduct of M&S in the information age. In: TolkA (ed.) Ontology, epistemology, and teleology for modeling and simulation: philosophical foundations for intelligent M&S applications. Cham: Springer, 2013, pp. 207–226.
27.
Teran-SomohanoADayıbasOYilmazL, et al. Toward a model-driven engineering framework for reproducible simulation experiment lifecycle management. In: Proceedings of the Winter simulation conference, Savannah, GA, 7–10 December 2014, pp. 2726–2737. New York: IEEE.
28.
YilmazL. Managing structural variability in agent-based models with feature coherence graphs. Int J Simul Process Model2020; 15: 439–453.
29.
DayıbaşOOğuztüzünHYılmazL. On the use of model-driven engineering principles for the management of simulation experiments. J Simul2019; 13: 83–95.
30.
YilmazLChakladarSDoudK, et al. Models as self-aware cognitive agents and adaptive mediators for model-driven science. In: 2017 Winter simulation conference (WSC), Las Vegas, NV, 3–6 December 2017, pp. 1300–1311. New York: IEEE.
31.
RodriguezBYilmazL. Learning rule-based explanatory models from exploratory multi-simulation for decision-support under uncertainty. In: 2020 Winter simulation conference (WSC), Orlando, FL, 14–18 December 2020, pp. 2293–2304. New York: IEEE.
32.
ThagardP. Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.
33.
YilmazL. Verification and validation of ethical decision-making in autonomous systems. In: Proceedings of the symposium on modeling and simulation of complexity in intelligent, adaptive and autonomous systems, Virginia Beach, VA, 23–26 April 2017, pp. 1–12. San Diego, CA: Society for Computer Simulation International.
34.
SivarajSYilmazL. Cogent: a coherence-driven cognitive agent modelling and experimentation framework. Int J Simul Process Model2019; 14: 36–50.
35.
YilmazLFranco-WatkinsAKroeckerTS. Computational models of ethical decision-making: a coherence-driven reflective equilibrium model. Cognit Syst Res2017; 46: 61–74.
36.
AwadELevineSAndersonM, et al. Computational ethics. Trends Cognit Sci2022; 26: 388–405.
37.
YilmazL. A quantum cognition model for simulating ethical dilemmas among multi-perspective agents. J Simul2020; 14: 98–106.
38.
ZouGYilmazL. Dynamics of knowledge creation in global participatory science communities: open innovation communities from a network perspective. Comput Math Organ Theory2011; 17: 35–58.
39.
YilmazLÖrenTIGhasem-AghaeeN. Simulation-based problem-solving environments for conflict studies. Simul Gaming2006; 37: 534–556.
40.
YilmazL. On the synergy of conflict and collective creativity in open innovation socio-technical ecologies. In: 2009 international conference on computational science and engineering, vol. 4, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 29–31 August 2009, pp. 502–508. New York: IEEE.
41.
ZouGYilmazL. InnoScape: a creative artificial ecosystem model of innovation and boundary processes in epistemic communities. Int J Simul Process Model2012; 7: 275–289.
42.
SchererWTolkATLoperM, et al. Chances and challenges of ChatGPT and similar models for education in M&S. In: WSC ‘23: Winter simulation conference, San Antonio, TX, 10–13 December 2023.
43.
Van WynsbergheA. Sustainable AI: AI for sustainability and the sustainability of AI. AI Ethics2021; 1: 213–218.
44.
MoonYB. Simulation modelling for sustainability: a review of the literature. Int J Sustain Eng2017; 10: 2–19.
45.
KuhnTS. The structure of scientific revolutions. London: University of Chicago Press, 2012.
ZhuoTYHuangYChenC, et al. Exploring AI ethics of ChatGPT: a diagnostic analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:230112867, 2023.
50.
CoeckelberghM. AI ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2020.
51.
ArnoldMShenviwagleDYilmazL. SciBrowser: a computational ethnography tool to explore open source science communities. In: Proceedings of the 48th annual southeast regional conference, Oxford, MS, 15–17 April 2010, pp. 1–6. New York: ACM.
PageSE. The model thinker: what you need to know to make data work for you. New York: Basic Books, 2018.
54.
SwartzTHPalermoAGSMasurSK, et al. The science and value of diversity: closing the gaps in our understanding of inclusion and diversity. J Infect Dis2019; 220: S33–S41.
