This paper presents a new cognitive agent design approach integrating spatial knowledge representation and reasoning in agent-based modeling dedicated to land use simulations. A deep motivation for our agent-centric contribution is the ever-increasing development of spatially explicit agent simulation platforms. We build on this technological evolution and topology theory to endow the agent with human’s spatial representation and reasoning following a Belief–Desire–Intention architecture. A pilot implementation of the methodology with simulation experiments on a hunting model was carried out in GAMA platform to assess agent performances. Simulations display a consistent trend of animal population dynamics and also confirm a high model sensitivity to the integration of spatial knowledge and reasoning in agent-based models of human actor. These results demonstrate a successful implementation and the importance of spatial dimension in the expressive power and the validity of agent-based models. Future research efforts should therefore emphasize on designing human knowledge representation and incorporating learning abilities to improve models efficiency.
FerberJ. Les Systmes multi-agents: vers une intelligence collective. Birmingham: InterEdition, 1995.
2.
ErshadiMMShafaeizadehA. Simulation-based improvement and modification for performances of hospitals: a case study. Int J Simul Proc Model2021; 16: 90–104.
3.
PageCLBoboKSWilliamKTO, et al. Interactive simulations with a stylized scale model to codesign with villagers an agent-based model of bushmeat hunting in the periphery of korup national park Cameroon. J Artif Soc Simul2015; 18: 1–8.
4.
BaiS. Simulations of covid-19 spread by spatial agent-based model and ordinary differential equations. Int J Simul Proc Model2020; 15: 268–227.
5.
IskandarRDugdaleJBeckE, et al. Agent-based simulation of seismic crisis including human behavior: application to the city of Beirut, Lebanon. Simulation2024; 100: 357–377.
6.
WooldridgeMJenningsN. An introduction to multiagent systems. 2nd ed.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
7.
WoodMFDeLoachSA. An overview of the multiagent systems engineering methodology. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 2001.
8.
BratmanME. Intention, plans and practical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.
9.
CaillouPGaudouBGrignardA, et al. A simple-to-use BDI architecture for agent-based modeling and simulation. In: JagerWVerbruggeRFlacheA (eds), Advances in social simulation 2015. Cham: Springer, 2017, pp. 15–28.
10.
TaillandierPTherondOGaudouB. Une architecture d’agent BDI base sur la thorie des fonctions de croyance: application la simulation du comportement des agriculteurs. Journes Francophones sur les Systmes Multi-Agents2012, 2012, https://hal.science/hal-00742874/document
11.
BrezolinJMLFioriniSRde Borba CamposM, et al. Using conceptual spaces for belief update in multi-agent systems. In: 2015 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence and intelligent agent technology, Singapore, 6–9 December 2015, pp. 178–181. New York: IEEE.
12.
KennedyWG. Modelling human behaviour in agent-based models. In: HeppenstallACrooksASeeL, et al. (eds) Agent-based models of geographical systems. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012, pp. 167–179.
13.
WooldridgeMJenningsNR. Agent theories, architectures, and languages: a survey. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 1995.
14.
BourgaisMTaillandierPVercouterL. Ben: an agent architecture for explainable and expressive behavior in social simulation. In: CalvaresiDNajjarASchumacherM, et al. (eds) Explainable, transparent autonomous agents and multi-agent systems, vol. 11763. Cham: Springer, 2019, pp. 147–163.
15.
Saeed BehzadiAA. Introducing a novel model of belief-desire-intention agent for urban land use planning. Eng Appl Artif Intel2013; 26: 2028–2044.
16.
DavisKChristodoulouJSeiderS, et al. The theory of multiple intelligences. In: SternbergRJ (ed.) Cambridge handbook of intelligence UK. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 659–678.
17.
BousquetFPageCLBakamI, et al. Multiagent simulations of hunting wild meat in a village in eastern Cameroon. Ecol Model2001; 138: 331–346.
18.
KamgaingWBoboKDjekdaD, et al. Population density estimates of forest duikers (philantomba monticola and cephalophus spp.) differ greatly between survey methods. Afr J Ecol2018; 56: 908–916.
19.
FaJERos BrullGAvila MartinE, et al. Hunting territories and land use overlap in sedentarised Baka Pygmy communities in southeastern Cameroon. Sci Rep2021; 11: 3503.
20.
YasuokaHHiraiMKamgaingW, et al. Changes in the composition of hunting catches in southeastern Cameroon: a promising approach for collaborative wildlife management between ecologists and local hunters. Ecol Soc2015; 20: 1–12.
21.
BriassoulisH. Analysis of land use change: theoretical and modelling approaches. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, 2000, https://ideas.repec.org/b/rri/wholbk/17.html.
22.
KameniEDVan der WeideTPde GrootWT. Natural model based design in context: an effective method for environmental problems. CSIMQ2017; 12: 86–116.
23.
FotsingEKakeuSVTKameniED, et al. An actor-oriented and architecture-driven approach for spatially explicit agent-based modeling. CSIMQ2023; 36: 16–37.
24.
StanilovK. Space in agent-based models. In: HeppenstallACrooksASeeL, et al. (eds) Agent-based models of geographical systems. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012, pp. 253–269.
25.
BrooksR. A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE J Robot Autom1986; 2: 14–23.
26.
DorriAKanhereSSJurdakR. Multi-agent systems: a survey. IEEE Access2018; 6: 28573–28593.
27.
BommelP. Dfinition dun cadre mthodologique pour la conception de modles multi-agents adapte la gestion des ressources renouvelables. PhD Th`ese, Universite Montpellier II, Montpellier, 2009.
28.
MacalCNorthM. Tutorial on agent-based modeling and simulation. In: Proceedings of the winter simulation conference, Orlando, FL, 4–4 December 2005, pp. 2–15. New York: IEEE.
29.
PereiraDMoreiraNOliveiraE. Formal modelling of emotions in BDI agents in computational logic in multi-agent systems. In: Portuguese conference on artificial intelligence, Porto: Springer, Vol. 5056, 2008, pp. 62–81.
30.
BroersenJDastaniMHulstijnJ, et al. Goal generation in the boid architecture. Cogn Sci Quart2002; 2: 428–447.
31.
AdamCGaudouB. BDI agents in social simulations: a survey. Knowl Eng Rev2016; 31: 207–238.
32.
DignumFDignumVJonkerCM. Towards agents for policy making. In: DavidNSichmanJS (eds) Multi-agent-based simulation IX (Lecture Notes in Computer Science Springer). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 2009, pp. 141–153.
TaillandierPBourgaisMCaillouP, et al. A BDI agent architecture for the GAMA modeling and simulation platform. In: NardinLAntunesL (eds) Multi-agent based simulation XVII, vol. 10399. Cham: Springer, 2016, pp. 3–23.
36.
MansonSAnLClarkeKC, et al. Methodological issues of spatial agent-based models. J Artif Soc Simul2020; 23: 3.
37.
EgenhoferMAl-TahaK. Reasoning about gradual changes of topological relationships. In: FrankAUCampariIFormentiniU (eds) Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning in geographic space (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 1992, pp. 196–219.
38.
NebelBFreksaC. AI approaches to cognitive systems -the example of spatial cognition. Inform Spektrum2011; 34: 462–468.
CheinMMugnierM. Graph-based knowledge representation -computational foundations of conceptual graphs (Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing). London: Springer, 2009.
41.
DavisRShrobeHSzolovitsP. What is a knowledge representation?AI Mag1993; 14: 17.
42.
BalkeTGilbertN. How do agents make decisions? A survey. JASSS2014; 17: 13.
43.
TaillandierPGrignardAGaudouB, et al. Des donnes gographiques la simulation base d’agents: application de la plate-forme gama. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014.
44.
WilenskyU. Technical report on mas. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-based Modeling. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, 1999, http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/
LifranRHofstetterA. Couplage simple entre systme d’information gographique et modle multi-agents pour simuler limpact des politiques publiques sur les dynamiques du paysage. LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier, Studies and Syntheses, 2009, https://institut-agro.docressources.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=79744
47.
NeumannWLeversCWidemoF, et al. Hunting as land use: understanding the spatial associations among hunting, agriculture, and forestry. J Ecol Soc2022; 27: 1–20.
48.
BoboKSNtumwelBCKamgaingW. Species richness, spatial distributions and densities of large-and medium-sized mammals in the northern periphery of boumba-bek national park, southeastern Cameroon. Afr Stud Monogr2014; 49: 91114.
49.
IchikawaM. A review of Japanese ecological anthropology on central African hunter-gatherers. Rev Ecol2021; 20: 8401.
50.
BoboKSkamgaingTOWKamdoumEC, et al. Bushmeat hunting in southeastern Cameroon: magnitude and impact on duikers (cephalophus spp.). Afr Stud Monogr2015; 51: 119–141.
