Synchronous generator system is a complicated dynamic system for energy transmission, which plays an important role in modern industrial production. In this article, we propose some predictor-corrector methods and structure-preserving methods for a generator system based on the first benchmark model of subsynchronous resonance, among which the structure-preserving methods preserve a Dirac structure associated with the so-called port-Hamiltonian descriptor systems. To illustrate this, the simplified generator system in the form of index-1 differential-algebraic equations has been derived. Our analyses provide the global error estimates for a special class of structure-preserving methods called Gauss methods, which guarantee their superior performance over the PSCAD/EMTDC and the predictor-corrector methods in terms of computational stability. Numerical simulations are implemented to verify the effectiveness and advantages of our methods.
KundurP. Power system stability and control. New York: McGraw-hill, 1994.
2.
XuZ. Physical mechanism and research approach of generalized synchronous stability for power systems. Electr Power Autom Equip2020; 40: 3–9.
3.
DongYWangYHanJ, et al. Review of high efficiency digital electromagnetic transient simulation technology in power system. Proc CSEE2018; 38: 2213–2231.
4.
ZhangYGoleAMWuW, et al. Development and analysis of applicability of a hybrid transient simulation platform combining TSA and EMT elements. IEEE Trans Power Syst2013; 28: 357–366.
5.
WatsonNArrillagaJ. Power systems electromagnetic transients simulation. 2nd ed.London: The Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2019.
6.
DommelHW. Digital computer solution of electromagnetic transients in single and multiphase networks. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst1969; 88: 388–399.
7.
DommelHW. EMTP theory book. 2nd ed.Vancouver, BC, Canada: Microtran Power System Analysis Corporation, 1992.
8.
JiFQiuYWeiX, et al. Nodal dynamic equation used for electromagnetic transient simulation of linear switching circuit. IET Sci Meas Technol2018; 12: 626–633.
9.
JiFGaoLLinC. Dynamics of three phase AC system and VSC access problem research. Proc CSEE2022; 42: 2286–2298.
10.
JiFGaoLLinC, et al. Lagrangian modelling and motion stability of synchronous generator power systems. Arxiv Preprint, arXiv:2311.03737, 2023.
FengK. On difference schemes and symplectic geometry. In: FengK (ed.) Proceedings of 1984 Beijing symposium on differential geometry and differential equations. Beijing: Science Press, 1985, pp. 42–58.
13.
HairerELubichCWannerG. Geometric numerical integration: structure preserving algorithms for ordinary differential equations. 2nd ed.Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2006, pp. 179–195.
14.
Sanz-SernaJM. Symplectic integrators for Hamiltonian problems: an overview. Acta Numer1992; 1: 243–286.
15.
TangYPérez-GarcíaVMVázquezL. Symplectic methods for the Ablowitz-Ladik model. Appl Math Comput1997; 2: 17–38.
16.
HeYZhouZSunY, et al. Explicit K-symplectic algorithms for charged particle dynamics. Phys Lett A2017; 381: 568–573.
17.
TaoM. Explicit high-order symplectic integrators for charged particles in general electromagnetic fields. J Comput Phys2016; 327: 245–251.
18.
ZhangRWangYHeY, et al. Explicit symplectic algorithms based on generating function for relativistic charged particle dynamics in time-dependent electromagnetic field. Phys Plasmas2018; 25: 022117.
19.
ZhouZHeYSunY, et al. Explicit symplectic methods for solving charged particle trajectories. Phys Plasmas2017; 24: 052507.
20.
ZhuBHuZTangY, et al. Symmetric and symplectic methods for gyrocenter dynamics in time-independent magnetic fields. Int J Model Simul Sci Comput2016; 7: 1650008.
21.
ZhangRLiuJTangY, et al. Canonicalization and symplectic simulation of the gyrocenter dynamics in time-independent magnetic fields. Phys Plasmas2014; 21: 032504.
22.
ZhuBTangYZhangR, et al. Symplectic simulation of dark solitons motion for nonlinear Schrodinger equation. Numer Algorithms2019; 81: 1485–1503.
23.
ZhangRHuangJTangY, et al. Revertible and symplectic methods for the Ablowitz-Ladik discrete nonlinear Schrodinger equation. In: CrosbieRVakilzadianHEricsenT, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 2011 grand challenges on modeling and simulation conference. Hague: ACM, 2011, pp. 297–306.
24.
ZhuBJiLZhuA, et al. Explicit K-symplectic methods for nonseparable non-canonical Hamiltonian systems. Chin Phys B2023; 32: 020204.
25.
MehrmannVMorandinR. Structure-preserving discretization for port-Hamiltonian descriptor systems. In: 2019 IEEE 58th conference on decision and control (CDC), Nice, 11–13 December 2019, pp. 6863–6868. New York: IEEE.
26.
Van Der SchaftAJJeltsemaD. Port-Hamiltonian systems theory: an introductory overview. Found Trends Syst Control2014; 1: 173–378.
27.
IEEE Committee. First benchmark model for computer simulation of subsynchronous resonance. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst1977; 96: 1565–1572.
28.
ChengSCaoYJiangQ. Theory and method of subsynchronous oscillation in power system. Beijing: Science Press, 2009.
29.
CelledoniEHøisethEH. Energy-preserving and passivity-consistent numerical discretization of port-Hamiltonian systems. Arxiv Preprint, arXiv:1706.08621, 2017.
30.
HairerELubichCRocheM. The numerical solution of differential-algebraic systems by Runge-Kutta methods. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1989.
