We present discrete-event simulation models of the operations of primary health centers (PHCs) in the Indian context. Our PHC simulation models incorporate four types of patients seeking medical care: outpatients, inpatients, childbirth cases, and patients seeking antenatal care. A generic modeling approach was adopted to develop simulation models of PHC operations. This involved developing an archetype PHC simulation, which was then adapted to represent two other PHC configurations, differing in numbers of resources and types of services provided, encountered during PHC visits. A model representing a benchmark configuration conforming to government-mandated operational guidelines, with demand estimated from disease burden data and service times closer to international estimates (higher than observed), was also developed. Simulation outcomes for the three observed configurations indicate negligible patient waiting times and low resource utilization values at observed patient demand estimates. However, simulation outcomes for the benchmark configuration indicated significantly higher resource utilization. Simulation experiments to evaluate the effect of potential changes in operational patterns on reducing the utilization of stressed resources for the benchmark case were performed. Our analysis also motivated the development of simple analytical approximations of the average utilization of a server in a queueing system with characteristics similar to the PHC doctor/patient system. Our study represents the first step in an ongoing effort to establish the computational infrastructure required to analyze public health operations in India and can provide researchers in other settings with hierarchical health systems, a template for the development of simulation models of their primary healthcare facilities.
AubronCLehouxHLucasC. Poverty and inequality in rural India: reflections based on two agrarian system analyses in the state of Gujarat. EchoGéo2015; 32: 1–21.
SriramS. Availability of infrastructure and manpower for primary health centers in a district in Andhra Pradesh, India. J Fam Med Prim Care2018; 7: 1256–1262.
VedRRGuptaGSinghS. India’s health and wellness centres: realizing universal health coverage through comprehensive primary health care. WHO South-East Asia J Public Heal2019; 8: 18–20.
FatmaNShoaibMMustafeeN, et al. Primary healthcare delivery network simulation using stochastic metamodels. In: BaeKFengBLazarova-MolnarS, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 2020 winter simulation conference, Orlando, FL, USA, 14-18 December 2020, paper no. 20607060, pp.818–829. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
16.
Awoonor-WilliamsJKTindanaPDalinjongPA, et al. Does the operations of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) in Ghana align with the goals of primary health care? Perspectives of key stakeholders in northern Ghana. BMC Int Health Hum Rights2016; 16: 1–11.
17.
AlvaradoMMCottonTGNtaimoL, et al. Modeling and simulation of oncology clinic operations in discrete event system specification. Simulation2018; 94: 105–121.
18.
LeeSMinDRyuJH, et al. A simulation study of appointment scheduling in outpatient clinics: open access and overbooking. Simulation2013; 89: 1459–1473.
19.
Bedoya-ValenciaLKiracE. Evaluating alternative resource allocation in an emergency department using discrete event simulation. Simulation2016; 92: 1041–1051.
20.
AshbyMFerrinDMillerM, et al. Discrete event simulation: optimizing patient flow and redesign in a replacement facility. In: MasonSHillRMonchL, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 2008 winter simulation conference, Miami, FL, USA, 7–10 December 2008, paper no. 10441586, pp.1632–1636. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
21.
EnglandWRobertsSD. Applications of computer simulation to health care. In: Proceedings of the 10th conference on winter simulation, Miami Beach, FL, USA, December 1978, pp.665–667. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
22.
JunAJBJacobsonSHSwisherJR. Application of discrete-event simulation in health care clinics: a survey. J Oper Res Soc1999; 50: 109–123.
23.
FoneDHollinghurstSTempleM, et al. Systematic review of the use and value of computer simulation modelling in population health and health care delivery. J Public Health Med2003; 25: 325–335.
24.
BrailsfordSCHarperPRPittM. An analysis of the academic literature on simulation and modelling in health care. J Simul2009; 3: 130–140.
25.
MielczarekBUziałko-MydlikowskaJ. Application of computer simulation modeling in the health care sector: a survey. Simulation2012; 88: 197–216.
26.
ZhangX. Application of discrete event simulation in health care: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res2018; 18: 1–11.
27.
GünalMMPiddM. Discrete event simulation for performance modelling in health care: a review of the literature. J Simul2010; 4: 42–51.
28.
ThorwarthMArishaA. Application of discrete-event simulation in health care: a review. Report, Technological University Dublin, 2009, https://arrow.dit.ie/buschmanrep/3.
29.
FetterRBThompsonJD. The simulation of hospital systems. Oper Res1965; 13: 689–711.
30.
FerrinDMMillerMJMcBroomDL. Maximizing hospital financial impact and emergency department throughput with simulation. In: HendersonSBillerBHsiehM, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 2007 winter simulation conference, Washington, DC, USA. Paper no. 9847901, pp.1566–1573. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
31.
RuohonenTNeittaanmäkiPTeittinenJ. Simulation model for improving the operation of the emergency department of special health care. In: PerroneLWielandFLiuJ, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 2006 winter simulation conference, Monterey, CA, USA, 3-6 December 2006, paper no. 9463213, pp.453–458. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
32.
SinreichDMarmorYN. A simple and intuitive simulation tool for analyzing the performance of emergency departments. In: IngallsRRossettiMSmithJ, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 2004 winter simulation conference, Washington, DC, USA, 5–8 December 2004, paper no. 8401360, pp.1994–2002. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
33.
YousefiMYousefiMFogliattoFS. Simulation-based optimization methods applied in hospital emergency departments: a systematic review. Simulation2020; 96: 791–806.
34.
SrinivasSNazarethRPShoriat UllahM. Modeling and analysis of business process reengineering strategies for improving emergency department efficiency. Simulation2021; 97: 3–18.
35.
McCleanSMillardP. Modelling in-patient bed usage behaviour in a department of geriatric medicine. Methods Inf Med1993; 32: 79–81.
36.
MarshallAVasilakisCEl-DarziE. Length of stay-based patient flow models: recent developments and future directions. Health Care Manag Sci2005; 8: 213–220.
37.
HarrisonGWShaferAMackyM. Modelling variability in hospital bed occupancy. Health Care Manag Sci2005; 8: 325–334.
38.
HarperPRGamlinHM. Reduced outpatient waiting times with improved appointment scheduling: a simulation modelling approach. OR Spectr2003; 25: 207–222.
39.
GuoMWagnerMWestC. Outpatient clinic scheduling – a simulation approach. In: IngallsRRossettiMSmithJ, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 2004 winter simulation conference, Washington, DC, USA, 5–8 December 2004, paper no. 8411306, pp.1981–1987. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
40.
JohannessenKAAlexandersenN. Improving accessibility for outpatients in specialist clinics: reducing long waiting times and waiting lists with a simple analytic approach. BMC Health Serv Res2018; 18: 1–13.
41.
RevankarNWardAJPelligraCG, et al. Modeling economic implications of alternative treatment strategies for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. J Med Econ2014; 17: 730–740.
42.
HamidMHamidMMusaviMM, et al. Scheduling elective patients based on sequence-dependent setup times in an open-heart surgical department using an optimization and simulation approach. Simulation2019; 95: 1141–1164.
43.
LoweryJC. Simulation of a hospital’s surgical suite and critical care area. In: SwainJGoldsmanDCrainR, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 1992 winter simulation conference, Virginia, Arlington, USA, 13–16 December 1992, pp.1071–1078. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
44.
GridaMZeidM. A system dynamics-based model to implement the theory of constraints in a healthcare system. Simulation2019; 95: 593–605.
45.
HasanIBahalkehEYihY. Evaluating intensive care unit admission and discharge policies using a discrete event simulation model. Simulation2020; 96: 501–518.
46.
MorriceDJBardJF. Designing and scheduling a multi-disciplinary integrated practice unit for patient-centred care. Heal Syst2020; 9: 293–316.
47.
RomeroHLDellaertNPVan Der GeerS, et al. Admission and capacity planning for the implementation of one-stop-shop in skin cancer treatment using simulation-based optimization. Health Care Manag Sci2013; 16: 75–86.
48.
HorvathLEYordanEMalhotraD, et al. Multidisciplinary care in the oncology setting: historical perspective and data from lung and gynecology multidisciplinary clinics. J Oncol Pract2010; 6: 21–26.
49.
CayirliTVeralERosenH. Designing appointment scheduling systems for ambulatory care services. Health Care Manag Sci2006; 9: 47–58.
50.
WhiteDLFroehleCMKlassenKJ. The effect of integrated scheduling and capacity policies on clinical efficiency. Prod Oper Manag2011; 20: 442–455.
51.
FialhoASOliveiraMDSáAB. Using discrete event simulation to compare the performance of family health unit and primary health care centre organizational models in Portugal. BMC Health Serv Res2011; 11: 1–11.
52.
IslamABiswasT. Health system in Bangladesh: challenges and opportunities. Am J Heal Res2014; 2: 366–374.
53.
SteeleMJMollaghasemiMRabadiG, et al. Generic simulation models of reusable launch vehicles. In: YucesanEChenCSnowdonJ, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 2002 winter simulation conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 8–11 December 2002, paper no. 7644190, pp.747–753. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
54.
RobinsonSNanceREPaulRJ, et al. Simulation model reuse: Definitions, benefits and obstacles. Simul Model Pract Theory2004; 12: 479–494.
55.
PiddMCarvalhoA. Simulation software: not the same yesterday, today or forever. J Simul2006; 1: 7–20.
56.
KaylaniAMollaghasemiMCopeD, et al. A generic environment for modelling future launch operations – GEM-FLO: A success story in generic modelling. J Oper Res Soc2008; 59: 1312–1320.
57.
FletcherAWorthingtonD. What is a ‘generic’ hospital model?-a comparison of ‘generic’ and ‘specific’ hospital models of emergency patient flows. Health Care Manag Sci2009; 12: 374–391.
58.
PennMLMonksTKazmierskaAA, et al. Towards generic modelling of hospital wards: reuse and redevelopment of simple models. J Simul2019; 14: 107–118.
59.
SwisherJRJacobsonSHJunJB, et al. Modeling and analyzing a physician clinic environment using discrete-event (visual) simulation. Comput Oper Res2001; 28: 105–125.
60.
MustafeeNWilliamsDMHughesF, et al. Simulation-based study of hematology outpatient clinics with focus on model reusability. In: JainSCreaseyRHimmelspachJ, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 2011 winter simulation conference, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 11–14 December 2011, paper no. 12541542, pp.1178–1189. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
61.
WeerawatWPichitlamkenJSubsombatP. A generic discrete-event simulation model for. J Healthc Eng2013; 4: 285–305.
62.
PrinjaSGuptaAVermaR, et al. Cost of delivering health care services in public sector primary and community health centres in North India. PLoS One2016; 11: e0160986.
63.
MitalKM. Queuing analysis for outpatient and inpatient services: a case study. Manag Decis2010; 48: 419–439.
64.
FletcherAHalsallDHuxhamS, et al. The DH accident and emergency department model: a national generic model used locally. J Oper Res Soc2007; 58: 1554–1562.
65.
FatmaNRamamohanV. Patient diversion across primary health centers using real time delay predictors, https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.11074 (2021).
66.
RaviSAhluwaliaRBergkvistS. Health and morbidity in India (2004-2014). Report, Brookings India Res Pap No 092016, August2016.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) 2015-16, http://rchiips.org/nfhs/nfhs-4Reports/India.pdf (2017, accessed 25 January 2017).
69.
IrvingGNevesALDambha-MillerH, et al. International variations in primary care physician consultation time: a systematic review of 67 countries. BMJ Open2017; 7: e017902.
70.
AhmadBAKhairatulKFarnazaA. An assessment of patient waiting and consultation time in a primary healthcare clinic. Malaysian Fam Physician2017; 12: 14–21.
71.
WHO Reproductive Health Library. WHO recommendation on duration of the first stage of labour. The WHO Reproductive Health Library; Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018.
72.
AbalosEOladapoOTChamillardM, et al. Duration of spontaneous labour in ‘low-risk’ women with ‘normal’ perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2018; 223: 123–132.
73.
PitchaimuthuNBhaskaranS. Labor pattern among primigravida in local population. J Obstet Gynecol India2018; 68: 482–486.
74.
V BothCFleßaSMakuwaniA, et al. How much time do health services spend on antenatal care? Implications for the introduction of the focused antenatal care model in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth2006; 6: 22.
75.
van der HamR. Salabim: discrete event simulation and animation in python. J Open Source Softw2018; 3: 767.
76.
KleinrockL. A conservation law for a wide class of queueing disciplines. Nav Res Logist Q1965; 12: 181–192.
77.
NarangR. Measuring perceived quality of health care services in India. Int J Health Care Qual Assur2010; 23: 171–186.
78.
RaoKDSheffelA. Quality of clinical care and bypassing of primary health centers in India. Soc Sci Med2018; 207: 80–88.
79.
RamaniSSivakamiMGilsonL. How context affects implementation of the primary health care approach: an analysis of what happened to primary health centres in India. BMJ Glob Heal2019; 3: e001381.
80.
LitvackJIBodartC. User fees plus quality equals improved access to health care: results of a field experiment in Cameroon. Soc Sci Med1993; 37: 369–383.
81.
AndaleebSS. Public and private hospitals in Bangladesh: service quality and predictors of hospital choice. Health Policy Plan2000; 15: 95–102.
82.
AkinJSHutchinsonP. Health-care facility choice and the phenomenon of bypassing. Health Policy Plan1999; 14: 135–151.
