Wind turbines experience stochastic loading due to seasonal variations in wind speed and direction. These harsh operational conditions lead to failures of wind turbines, which are difficult to predict. Consequently, it is challenging to schedule maintenance actions that will avoid failures. In this article, a simulation-driven online maintenance scheduling algorithm for wind farm operational planning is derived. Online scheduling is a suitable framework for this problem since it integrates data that evolve over time into the maintenance scheduling decisions. The computational study presented in this article compares the performance of the simulation-driven online scheduling algorithm against two benchmark algorithms commonly used in practice: scheduled maintenance and condition-based monitoring maintenance. An existing discrete event system specification simulation model was used to test and study the benefits of the proposed algorithm. The computational study demonstrates the importance of avoiding over-simplistic assumptions when making maintenance decisions for wind farms. For instance, most literature assumes maintenance lead times are constant. The computational results show that allowing lead times to be adjusted in an online fashion improves the performance of wind farm operations in terms of the number of turbine failures, availability capacity, and power generation.
ArtigaoEMartín-MartínezSHonrubia-EscribanoA, et al. Wind turbine reliability: a comprehensive review towards effective condition monitoring development. Appl Energy2018; 228: 1569–1583.
3.
BentRVan HentenryckP.Regrets only! online stochastic optimization under time constraints. In: AAAI’04: Proceedings of the 19th national conference on artifical intelligence, San Jose, CA, USA, 25 July 2004, pp.501–506. Palo Alto, CA, USA: ACM.
4.
WuFJWangTYLeeJ.An online adaptive condition-based maintenance method for mechanical systems. Mech Syst Signal Process2010; 24: 2985–2995.
5.
PérezE. Integrating mathematical optimization in devs for nuclear medicine patient and resource scheduling. In: 2017 winter simulation conference (WSC), Las Vegas, NV, 3–6 December 2017, pp.398–407. New York: IEEE.
6.
ByonEPérezEDingY, et al. Simulation of wind farm operations and maintenance using discrete event system specification. Simulation2011; 87: 1093–1117.
7.
ZhouYKouGXiaoH, et al. Sequential imperfect preventive maintenance model with failure intensity reduction with an application to urban buses. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2020; 198: 106871.
8.
ShafieeMSørensenJD.Maintenance optimization and inspection planning of wind energy assets: models, methods and strategies. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2019; 192: 105993.
9.
PérezENtaimoLMalavéCO, et al. Stochastic online appointment scheduling of multi-step sequential procedures in nuclear medicine. Health Care Manage Sci2013; 16: 281–299.
10.
JiaMSrinivasanRSRaheemAA.From occupancy to occupant behavior: An analytical survey of data acquisition technologies, modeling methodologies and simulation coupling mechanisms for building energy efficiency. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017; 68: 525–540.
11.
CarrollJMcDonaldAMcMillanD.Failure rate, repair time and unscheduled O&M cost analysis of offshore wind turbines. Wind Energy2016; 19: 1107–1119.
12.
AlabdulkarimAABallPDTiwariA.Applications of simulation in maintenance research. World J Model Simul2013; 9: 14–37.
13.
DingS-HKamaruddinS.Maintenance policy optimization—literature review and directions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2015; 76: 1263–1283.
14.
McMillanDAultGW.Condition monitoring benefit for onshore wind turbines: sensitivity to operational parameters. IET Renew Power Gener2008; 2: 60–72.
15.
AndrawusJAWatsonJKishkM.Modelling system failures to optimise wind turbine maintenance. Wind Eng2007; 31: 503–522.
16.
HallPStruttJ.Probabilistic physics-of-failure models for component reliabilities using Monte Carlo simulation and Weibull analysis: a parametric study. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2003; 80: 233–242.
17.
PérezENtaimoLByonE, et al. A stochastic DEVS wind turbine component model for wind farm simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2010 spring simulation multiconference, Orlando, FL, USA, 11–15 April 2010, pp.1–8. San Diego, CA, USA: ACM.
18.
PérezENtaimoLDingY.Multi-component wind turbine modeling and simulation for wind farm operations and maintenance. Simulation2015; 91: 360–382.
19.
PérezENtaimoLDingY. Simulation of wind farm operations and maintenance. In: Turbo expo: power for land, sea, and air, San Antonio, TX, USA, June 3–7, 2013, p.V008T044A007. New York, NY, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
20.
SahnounMhBaudryDMustafeeN, et al. Modelling and simulation of operation and maintenance strategy for offshore wind farms based on multi-agent system. J Intell Manuf2019; 30: 2981–2997.
21.
IrawanCAOuelhadjDJonesD, et al. Optimisation of maintenance routing and scheduling for offshore wind farms. Eur J Oper Res2017; 256: 76–89.
22.
FrogerAGendreauMMendozaJE, et al. Solving a wind turbine maintenance scheduling problem. J Scheduling2018; 21: 53–76.
23.
KovacsAErdősGViharosZJ, et al. A system for the detailed scheduling of wind farm maintenance. CIRP Ann2011; 60: 497–501.
24.
GustavssonEPatrikssonMStrömbergA-B, et al. Preventive maintenance scheduling of multi-component systems with interval costs. Comput Ind Eng2014; 76: 390–400.
25.
ZhongSPantelousAABeerM, et al. Constrained non-linear multi-objective optimisation of preventive maintenance scheduling for offshore wind farms. Mech Syst Signal Process2018; 104: 347–369.
26.
ZhongSPantelousAAGohM, et al. A reliability-and-cost-based fuzzy approach to optimize preventive maintenance scheduling for offshore wind farms. Mech Syst Signal Process2019; 124: 643–663.
27.
JalalabadiESalehizadehMRRahimi kianA.Optimal control of the power ramp rate with flicker mitigation for directly grid connected wind turbines. Simulation2020; 96: 141–150.
28.
XiangHDaiCZhaoC, et al. Generating units maintenance scheduling considering peak regulation pressure with large-scale wind farms. In: 2016 China international conference on electricity distribution (CICED), Xi’an, China, –13 August 2016, pp.1–6. New York: IEEE.
29.
CamciF.Maintenance scheduling of geographically distributed assets with prognostics information. Eur J Oper Res2015; 245: 506–516.
30.
YokotaTGenMTaguchiT, et al. A method for interval 0–1 nonlinear programming problem using a genetic algorithm. Comput Ind Eng1995; 29: 531–535.
31.
FrogerAGendreauMMendozaJE, et al. A branch-and-check approach for a wind turbine maintenance scheduling problem. Comput Oper Res2017; 88: 117–136.
32.
GrossmannIEBieglerLT.Part II. Future perspective on optimization. Comput Chem Eng2004; 28: 1193–1218.
33.
ByonEDingY.Season-dependent condition-based maintenance for a wind turbine using a partially observed markov decision process. IEEE Trans Power Syst2010; 25: 1823–1834.
34.
ByonENtaimoLDingY.Optimal maintenance strategies for wind turbine systems under stochastic weather conditions. IEEE Trans Reliab2010; 59: 393–404.
35.
TianZGJinTDWuBR, et al. Condition based maintenance optimization for wind power generation systems under continuous monitoring. Renew Energy2011; 36: 1502–1509.
36.
LeighJMDunnettSJ.Use of Petri nets to model the maintenance of wind turbines. Qual Reliab Eng Int2016; 32: 167–180.
37.
AbdollahzadehHAtashgarKAbbasiM.Multi-objective opportunistic maintenance optimization of a wind farm considering limited number of maintenance groups. Renew Energy2016; 88: 247–261.
38.
WeinzettelJReenaasMSolliC, et al. Life cycle assessment of a floating offshore wind turbine. Renew Energy2009; 34: 742–747.
39.
RademakersLWMMVerbruggenTWBraamH. Condition monitoring for lowering maintenance costs of offshore wind turbines. In: Proceedings of ISMA 2004: international conference on noise and vibration engineering, Vols 1–8, Leuven, Belgium, 20–22 September 2004, pp.3943–3952. Heverlee, Belgium: Katholieke University Leuven, Department Werktuigkunde.
40.
RodriguesLRGomesJPP. TLBO with variable weights applied to shop scheduling problems. CAAI Trans Intell Technol2019; 4: 148–158.
41.
LalwaniSSharmaHVermaA, et al. Efficient discrete firefly algorithm for Ctrie based caching of multiple sequence alignment on optimally scheduled parallel machines. CAAI Trans Intell Technol2019; 4: 92–100.
42.
Ruiz-TorresAJPalettaGPérezE.Parallel machine scheduling to minimize the makespan with sequence dependent deteriorating effects. Comput Operat Res2013; 40: 2051–2061.
43.
Ruiz-TorresAJPalettaGPerez-RomanE.Maximizing the percentage of on-time jobs with sequence dependent deteriorating process times. Int J Oper Res Inf Syst2015; 6: 1–18.
44.
PérezEAmbatiRRRuiz-TorresAJ.Maximising the number of on-time jobs on parallel servers with sequence dependent deteriorating processing times and periodic maintenance. Int J Oper Res2018; 32: 267–289.
