An efficient container stacking approach is vital to the handling efficiency of container transshipment terminals. In this paper, by considering container allocation preferences and operation distance, the container stacking problem in rail–truck transshipment terminals has been formulated as a multi-objective optimization model to minimize container overlapping amounts and crane moving distance. A simulation-based algorithm implementing process has been developed to stack containers to the optimum positions. Computational experiments on data from a rail–truck transshipment terminal in China are conducted to test the efficiency of the proposed approach. Experimental results demonstrate that the container stacking approach is efficient and significant for improving handling efficiency in rail–truck transshipment terminals.
CarloHJVisIFRoodbergenKJ.Storage yard operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, and research directions. Eur J Oper Res2014; 235: 412–430.
2.
ZhangCLiuJWanYW, et al. Storage space allocation in container terminals. Transp Res B Methodol2003; 37: 883–903.
3.
ChenLLuZ.The storage location assignment problem for outbound containers in a maritime terminal. Int J Prod Econ2012; 135: 73–80.
4.
GuldoganEU.Simulation-based analysis for hierarchical storage assignment policies in a container terminal. Simulation2011; 87: 523–537.
5.
SharifOHuynhN.Storage space allocation at marine container terminals using ant-based control. Expert Syst Appl2013; 40: 2323–2330.
6.
JinZHMaoJLiN.Scheduling of relocating containers within a bay in container yard based on hybrid dynamic programming. J Transp Syst Eng Inform Technol2011; 11: 131–136.
7.
JinBZhuWLimA.Solving the container relocation problem by an improved greedy look-ahead heuristic. Eur J Oper Res2015; 240: 837–847.
8.
KuDArthanariTS.Container relocation problem with time windows for container departure. Eur J Oper Res2016; 252: 1031–1039.
9.
CasertaMSchwarzeSVoßS.A mathematical formulation and complexity considerations for the blocks relocation problem. Eur J Oper Res2012; 219: 96–104.
10.
HakanAMLeeCY.A mathematical formulation and efficient heuristics for the dynamic container relocation problem. Naval Res Logist2014; 61: 101–118.
11.
BoysenNFliednerMJaehnF, et al. A survey on container processing in railway yards. Transp Sci2013; 47: 312–329.
12.
WangLZhuXNXieZY.Storage space allocation of inbound container in railway container terminal. Math Probl Eng2014; 2014: 1–8.
13.
WangLZhuXNXieZY, et al. Container slot allocation model of railway container terminal yard based on mixed storage mode. Adv Inform Sci Service Sci2013; 5: 370–377.
ZhouCChewEPLeeLH, et al. An introduction and performance evaluation of the GRID system for transshipment terminals. Simulation2016; 92: 277–293.
20.
JiMZhuHWangQ, et al. Integrated strategy for berth allocation and crane assignment on a continuous berth using Monte Carlo simulation. Simulation2015; 91: 26–42.
21.
SunZTanKCLeeLH, et al. Design and evaluation of mega container terminal configurations: an integrated simulation framework. Simulation2013; 89: 684–692.
22.
ChangDJiangZYanW, et al. Integrating berth allocation and quay crane assignments. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev2010; 46: 975–990.
