MustafeeNBrailsfordSDjanatlievAet al. Purpose and benefits of hybrid simulation: contributing to the convergence of its definition. In: Proceedings of the 2017 winter simulation conference, Las Vegas, NV, December 3–6, 2017, pp. 1631–1645. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
2.
PowellJHMustafeeN. Widening requirements capture with soft methods: an investigation of hybrid M&S studies in healthcare. J Oper Res Soc2017; 68(10): 1211–1222.
3.
MustafeeNPowellJH. Towards a unifying conceptual representation of hybrid simulation and hybrid systems modelling. In: Proceedings of the Operational Research Society simulation workshop 2018 (SW18), Worcestershire, UK, March 19–21, 2018. UKORS (accepted).
4.
CardoenBManhaeveSTendelooYVet al. A PDEVS simulator supporting multiple synchronization protocols: implementation and performance analysis. Simulation: Transactions of the SCS2018; 94(4). Epub ahead of print 1 February 2018). DOI: 10.1177/0037549717690826.
5.
GoldsteinRBreslavSKhanA. Practical aspects of the DesignDEVS simulation environment. Simulation2018; 94(4). Epub ahead of print 18 August 2017. DOI: 10.1177/0037549717718258.
6.
CollinsAJFrydenlundE. Strategic group formation in agent-based simulation. Simulation2018; 94(3): 179–193.
7.
BellDMgbemenaC. Data-driven agent-based exploration of customer behavior. Simulation2018; 94(3): 195–212.
8.
KaziBUWainerG. Integrated cellular framework for modeling ecosystems: theory and applications. Simulation2018; 94(3): 235–257.
9.
DjitogIAliyuHOTraoreMK. A model-driven framework for multiparadigm modeling and holistic simulation of healthcare systems. Simulation2018; 94(3): 235–257.
10.
BarrosFJ. Modular representation of asynchronous geometric integrators with support for dynamic topology: strategic group formation in agent-based simulation. Simulation2018; 94(3): 259–274.
