The aim of this study is to develop a method to assess window area based on electricity consumption in office buildings in southern Brazil. The method may be used in the preliminary building design process in order to help choose an adequate window area to minimize its impact on energy consumption, depending on climate, building size, solar orientation, and mode of operation. The method also considered thermal comfort and daylighting performance. Four cases were investigated: Case 1, building operating with artificial lighting and air-conditioning; Case 2, considering integration of daylight and artificial light with air-conditioning; Case 3, building operating with hybrid ventilation and artificial lighting; and Case 4, considering integration of daylight and artificial light with hybrid ventilation. EnergyPlus and Daysim simulation programs were used to estimate the electricity consumption for each model. The integration of daylighting with artificial light (Case 2) generates more potential for energy savings (PES) than hybrid ventilation (Case 3). Case 4 showed PES ranging from 4.2% to 64.9%, allowing larger window areas with lower consumption, resulting in the highest PES.
Pérez-LombardLOrtizJPoutC.A review on buildings energy consumption information. Energ Build2008; 40: 394–398.
2.
Energy Information Administration. 2003 commercial buildings energy consumption survey. U.S. Department of Energy, 2008.
3.
JiYLomasKJCookMJ.Hybrid ventilation for low energy building design in south China. Build Environ2009; 44: 2245–2255.
4.
KaravaPAthienitisAKStathopoulosTet al. Experimental study of the thermal performance of a large institutional building with mixed-mode cooling and hybrid ventilation. Build Environ2012; 57: 313–326.
5.
JreijiryDHusaunndeeAInardC.Numerical study of a hybrid ventilation system for single family houses. Sol Energ2007; 81: 227–239.
6.
MankibiMECronFMichelPet al. Prediction of hybrid ventilation performance using two simulation tools. Sol Energ2006; 80: 908–926.
7.
NiachouKHassidSSantamourisMet al. Experimental performance investigation of natural, mechanical and hybrid ventilation in urban environment. Build Environ2008; 43: 1373–1382.
8.
May-OstendorpPHenzeGPCorbinCDet al. Model-predictive control of mixed-mode buildings with rule extraction. Build Environ2011; 46: 428–437.
9.
KimJde DearR.Impact of different building ventilation modes on occupant expectations of the main IEQ factors. Build Environ2012; 57: 184–193.
10.
LiDHWLamJC. Measurements of solar radiation and illuminance on vertical surfaces and daylighting implications. Renew Energ2000; 20: 389–404.
11.
BodartMHerdeAD.Global energy savings in offices buildings by the use of daylighting. Energ Build2002; 34: 421–429.
12.
OnaygilSGulerO.Determination of the energy saving by daylight responsive lighting control systems with an example from Istanbul. Build Environ2003; 38: 973–977.
13.
RoisinBBodartMDeneyerAet al. Lighting energy savings in offices using different control systems and their real consumption. Energ Build2008; 40: 514–523.
14.
OhMHLeeKHYoonJH.Automated control strategies of inside slat-type blind considering visual comfort and building energy performance. Energ Build2012; 55: 728–737.
15.
FernandesLLLeeESWardG.Lighting energy savings potential of split-pane electrochromic windows controlled for daylighting with visual comfort. Energ Build2013; 61: 8–20.
16.
BragerGBorgesonSLeeYS.Control strategies for mixed-mode buildings. Center for the Built Environment, University of California, Berkeley, 2007.
17.
LomasKJCookMJFialaD.Low energy architecture for a severe US climate: design and evaluation of a hybrid ventilation strategy. Energ Build2007; 39: 32–44.
18.
BragerGBakerL. Occupant satisfaction in mixed-mode buildings. In: Proceedings of conference: air conditioning and the low carbon cooling challenge, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, 27–29 July 2008. London: Network for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings, http://nceub.org.uk.
19.
InaniciMNDemirbilekFN.Thermal performance optimization of building aspect ratio and south window size in five cities having different climatic characteristics of Turkey. Build Environ2000; 35: 41–52.
20.
GhisiETinkerJA.An ideal window area concept for energy efficient integration of daylight and artificial light in buildings. Build Environ2005; 40: 51–61.
21.
KontoleonKJBikasDK.Modeling the influence of glazed openings percentage and type of glazing on the thermal zone behavior. Energ Build2002; 40: 389–399.
Laboratrio de Eficência Energtica em Edificaes da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina [Laboratory of Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Federal University of Santa Catarina]. Arquivo climtico de Florianpolis [Climate file of Florianpolis]. http://www.labeee.ufsc.br/ (2011, accessed 21 February 2011). (in Portuguese).
26.
GuL. Airflow network modeling in EnergyPlus. In: Proceedings of conference: 10th international building performance simulation association conference and exhibition, Beijing, China, 3–6 September 2007, pp.964. San Francisco, CA: International Building Performance Simulation Association.
27.
HenningerRHWitteMJ. EnergyPlus testing with building thermal envelope and fabric load tests from ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 140-2007 (version 6.0). Report for the U.S. Department of Energy, 2010.
28.
ShresthaSMaxwellG. Empirical validation of building energy simulation software: EnergyPlus. In: Proceedings of conference: 12th international building performance simulation association conference, Sydney, Australia, 14–16 November 2011, pp.2935. San Francisco, CA: International Building Performance Simulation Association.
29.
ZhaiZJohnsonM-HKrartiM.Assessment of natural and hybrid ventilation models in whole-building energy simulations. Energ Build2011; 43: 2251–2261.
30.
ReinhartCFWalkenhorstO.Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds. Energ Build2001; 33: 683–697.
31.
GhisiE.The use of fibre optics on energy efficient lighting in buildings. PhD Thesis, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, 2002.
32.
SantanaMV.Influência de parâmetros construtivos no consumo de energia de edifícios de escritório localizados em Florianópolis-SC [Influence of the constructive parameters on the energy consumption of office buildings located in Florianópolis-SC]. Masters Dissertation. Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil, 2006 (in Portuguese).
33.
RuppRFGhisiE.What is the most adequate method to assess thermal comfort in hybrid commercial buildings located in hot-humid summer climate?Renew Sustain Energ Rev2014; 29: 449–462.
34.
LoutzenhiserPGMaxwellGMManzH.An empirical validation of the daylighting algorithms and associated interactions in building energy simulation programs using various shading devices and windows. Energy2007; 32: 1855–1870.
35.
RamosGGhisiE.Analysis of daylight calculated using the EnergyPlus program. Renew Sustain Energ Rev2010; 14: 1948–1958.
36.
ABNT. NBR ISO/CIE 8995–1:20113. Iluminação de ambientes de trabalho: parte 1: interior [Lighting of work places: part 1: indoor] (in Portuguese).
37.
NabilAMardaljevicJ.Useful daylight illuminances: a replacement for daylight factors. Energ Build2006; 38: 905–913.
38.
ReinhartCFMardaljevicJRogersZ.Dynamic daylight performance metrics for sustainable building design. LEUKOS2006; 3: 1–25.
39.
ReinhartCFWienoldJ.The daylighting dashboard - a simulation-based design analysis for daylit spaces. Build Environ2011; 46: 386–396.
40.
GivoniB.Comfort, climate analysis and building design guidelines. Energ Build1992; 18: 11–23.
41.
Laboratório de Eficiência Energética em Edificações da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina [Laboratory of Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Federal University of Santa Catarina]. Programa Computacional Analysis Bio [Analysis Bio Computer Programme]. (Version 2.2) [Software]. http://www.labeee.ufsc.br/downloads/softwares/analysis-bio. (2011, accessed 10 May 2011).
42.
GhisiETinkerJAIbrahimSH.Área de janela e dimensões de ambientes para iluminação natural e eficiência energética: literatura versus simulação computacional [Window area and room sizes for daylight and energy efficiency: literature versus computer simulation]. Ambiente Construído2005; 5: 81–93 (in Portuguese).
