Studies of past emergency events have revealed that occupants’ behaviors, local geometry, and environmental constraints affect crowd movement and evacuation. Design of egress systems should take into consideration the social characteristics of the occupants and the unique layout of the buildings. This paper describes an agent-based egress simulation tool, SAFEgress, which is designed to incorporate human and social behaviors during evacuations. The unique feature of SAFEgress is its flexibility to model different individual, group, and crowd behavior. Simulations are conducted to examine egress performance of a museum floor plan for three scenarios: (1) expected occupancy load during peak hours; (2) group behaviors among museum visitors; and (3) measures to reduce pre-evacuation delay. By assuming different occupants’ behaviors in the simulations, engineers, designers, and facility managers can study the important human and social factors on an egress situation and, thereby, improve the design of safe egress systems and procedures.
AguirreBETorresMRGillKB. Normative collective behavior in the station building fire. Soc Sci Q2011; 92: 100–118.
2.
KuligowskiED. Terror defeated: occupant sensemaking, decision-making and protective action in the 2001 World Trade Center disaster. PhD Thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder, 2011.
3.
MawsonAR. Understanding mass panic and other collective responses to threat and disaster. Psychiatry2005; 68: 95–113.
4.
SimeJD. Affiliative behavior during escape to building exits. J Environ Psychol1983; 3: 21–41.
5.
McPhailC. The myth of the madding crowd. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1991.
6.
DruryJCockingCReicherS. Everyone for themselves? A comparative study of crowd solidarity among emergency survivors. British Journal of Social Psychology2009; 48: 487–506.
7.
RydgrenJ. Beliefs. In: HedströmPBearmanP (eds) The Oxford handbook of analytical sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, pp.72–93.
8.
KuligowskiED. Modeling human behavior during building fire, NIST Technical Note 1619. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2008.
9.
MacyMFlacheA. Social dynamics from the bottom up: Agent-based models of social interaction, In: HedströmPBearmanP (eds) The Oxford handbook of analytical sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, pp.245–268.
10.
KuligowskiEDPeacockRD. A review of building evacuation models. Technical Note 1471, Building and Fire Research Laboratory, NIST, 2005.
11.
ChallengerWCleggWCRobinsonAM. Understanding crowd behaviors: guidance and lessons identified, Technical Report prepared for UK Cabinet Office, Emergency Planning College, University of Leeds, 2009.
12.
PanX. Computational modeling of human and social behavior for emergency egress analysis. PhD Thesis, Stanford University, 2006.
13.
TsaiJFridmanNBowringE. ESCAPES: Evacuation simulation with children, authorities, parents, emotions, and social comparison. In: proceedings of the 10th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, 2011, pp.457–464. ACM Press.
14.
AguirreBEEl-TawilSBestE. Contributions of social science to agent-based models of building evacuation. Contemp Soc Sci2011; 6: 415–432.
15.
MoussaïdMPerozoNGarnierS. The walking behaviour of pedestrian social groups and its impact on crowd dynamics. PLoS ONE2010; 5: e10047.
16.
GwynneSGaleaERLawrencePJ. The introduction of social adaptation within evacuation modelling. Fire Mater2006; 30: 285–309.
17.
ChuMLLawKH. A computational framework incorporating human behaviors for egress simulations. ASCE J Comput Civil Eng2013; 27: 699–707.
18.
GärlingTBöökALindbergE. Spatial orientation and wayfinding in the designed environment: a conceptual analysis and some suggestions for post-occupancy evaluation. J Architect Plann Res1986; 3: 55–64.
19.
TurnerAPennA. Encoding natural movement as an agent-based system: an investigation into human pedestrian behaviour in the built environment. Environ Plann Plann Des2002; 29: 473–490.
20.
ThompsonPMarchantE. Testing and application of the computer model “Simulex”. Fire Saf J1995; 24: 149–166.
21.
VeeraswamyALawrencePGaleaE. Implementation of cognitive mapping, spatial representation and wayfinding behaviours of people within evacuation modelling tools. In: proceedings of 2009 human behavior in fire symposium, 2009.
22.
KneidlAHartmannDBorrmannA. A hybrid multi-scale approach for simulation of pedestrian dynamics. Transport Res C Emerg Tech. Epub ahead of print 18 April 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.03.005.
23.
MusseSRThalmannD. Hierarchical model for real time simulation of virtual human crowds. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph2001; 7: 152–164.
24.
JohnsonNRFeinbergWE. The impact of exit instructions and number of exits in fire emergencies: a computer simulation investigation. J Environ Psychol1997; 17: 123–133.
25.
ChuML. A computational framework incorporating human and social behaviors for occupant-centric egress simulation. PhD Thesis, Stanford University, 2015.
26.
ProulxGReidMA. Occupant behavior and evacuation during the Chicago Cook County Administration Building fire. J Fire Protect Eng2006; 16: 283–309.
27.
DonaldICanterD. Behavioral aspects of the King’s Cross disaster. In: Fires and human behavior. 2nd ed.London: David Fulton Publishers, 1990, pp.15–30.
28.
JohnstonDMJohnsonNR. Role extension in disaster: employee behavior at the Beverly Hills Supper Club fire. Socio Focus1989; 22: 39–51.
29.
LindellMKPerryRW. The protective action decision model: theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Anal2011; 32: 616–632.
30.
NilssonDMariaJHåkaF. Evacuation experiment in a road tunnel: a study of human behaviour and technical installations. Fire Saf J2009; 44: 458–468.
31.
JohnsonNR. Panic and the breakdown of social order: popular myth, social theory, empirical evidence. Socio Focus1987; 20: 171–183.
32.
SimeJD. Movement toward the familiar person and place affiliation in a fire entrapment settingEnviron Behav1985; 17: 697–724.
33.
HelbingDFarkasIVicsekT. Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature2000; 407: 487–490.
