Analytic solution of the susceptible-infective epidemic model with state-dependent contact rates and different intervention policies

Abstract

We consider the susceptible-infective (SI) epidemiological model, a variant of the Kermack–McKendrick models, and let the contact rate be a function of the number of infectives, an indicator of disease spread during the course of the epidemic. We represent the resultant model as a continuous-time Markov chain. The result is a pure death (or birth) process with state-dependent rates, for which we find the probability distribution of the associated Markov chain by solving the Kolmogorov forward equations. This model is used to find the analytic solution of the SI model as well as the distribution of the epidemic duration. We use the maximum likelihood method to estimate contact rates based on observations of inter-infection time intervals. We compare the stochastic model to the corresponding deterministic models through a numerical experiment within a typical household. We also incorporate different intervention policies for vaccination, antiviral prophylaxis, isolation, and treatment considering both full and partial adherence to interventions among individuals.

Keywords

susceptible-infective model epidemic duration state-dependent contact rates interventions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kermack

McKendrick

. A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc R Soc London Part A 1927; 115: 700–721.

Hethcote

. Qualitative analyses of communicable disease models. Math Biosci 1976; 28: 335–356.

Zhou

Liu

Bai

. Behaviors of susceptible-infected epidemics on scale-free networks with identical infectivity. Phys Rev E 2006; 74. http://pre.aps.org/abstract/PRE/v74/i5/e056109.

Bai

Zhou

Wang

. Immunization of susceptible–infected model on scale-free networks. Physica A 2007; 384: 656–662.

Krause

Scholz

Greiner

. Optimized network structure and routing metric in wireless multihop ad hoc communication. Physica A 2006; 361: 707–23.

Gupta

Kumar

. The capacity of wireless networks. IIE Trans Inform Theor 2000; 46: 388–404.

Kim

Jun

Kim

. Network marketing on a small-world network. Physica A 2006; 360: 493–504.

Larson

. Simple models of influenza progression within a heterogeneous population. Oper Res 2007; 55: 399–412.

Bailey

NTJ

. The mathematical theory of epidemics. London: Charles Griffin, 1957.

10.

Newman

MEJ

. The spread of epidemic disease on networks. Phys Rev E 2002; 66: 1–11.

11.

Gani

. On a partial differential equation of epidemic theory I. Biometrika 1965; 52: 617–622.

12.

Gart

. The mathematical analysis of an epidemic with two kinds of susceptibles. Biometrics 1968; 24: 557–566.

13.

Boquet

. A discrete study of the SIR model, www.math.vt.edu/people/gboquet/papers/discrete.pdf (19 June 2012).

14.

Lewis

Glass

. Steady states, limit cycles, and chaos in models of complex biological networks. Int J Bifurcation Chaos 1991; 1: 477–483.

15.

Laubenbacher

Stigler

. A computational algebra approach to the reverse engineering of gene regulatory networks. J Theor Biol 2004; 229: 523–537.

16.

Allen

LJS

Burgin

. Comparison of deterministic and stochastic SIS and SIR models in discrete time. Math Biosci 2000; 163: 1–33.

17.

Castillo-Chavez

Yakubu

. Discrete-time SIS models with complex dynamics. Nonlinear Anal 2001; 47: 4753–4762.

18.

Enszer

Stadtherr

. Verified solution of nonlinear dynamic models in epidemiology. Math Ind 2010; 15: 557–62.

19.

Severo

. Two theorems on solutions of differential-difference equations and applications to epidemic theory. J Appl Probab 1967; 4: 271–280.

20.

Severo

. Generalizations of some stochastic epidemic models. Math Biosci 1969; 4: 395–402.

21.

Gleissner

. The spread of epidemics. Appl Math Comput 1988; 27: 167–171.

22.

O’Neill

. An epidemic model with removal-dependent infection rate. Ann Appl Probab 1997; 7: 90–109.

23.

Ball

O’Neill

. A modification of the general stochastic epidemic motivated by AIDS modelling. Adv Appl Probab 1993; 25: 39–62.

24.

Billard

Lacayo

Langberg

. A new look at the simple epidemic process. J Appl Probab 1979; 16: 198–202.

25.

Severo

. Right-shift processes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1969; 64: 1162–1164.

26.

Bartlett

Gower

Leslie

. A comparison of theoretical and empirical results for some stochastic population models. Biometrika 1960; 47: 1–11.

27.

Mode

. Some multi-dimensional birth and death processes and their applications in population genetics. Biometrics 1962; 18: 543–567.

28.

Leslie

Gower

. The properties of a stochastic model for the predator-prey type of interaction between two species. Biometrika 1960; 47: 219–234.

29.

Birkhead

. The transient solution of the linear birth-death process with random spontaneous mutation. Math Biosci 1986; 82: 193–200.

30.

Kendall

. On the generalized “birth-and-death” process. Ann Math Statistics 1948; 19(1): 1–15.

31.

Severo

. A recursion theorem on solving differential-difference equations and applications to some stochastic processes. J Appl Probab 1969; 6: 673–681.

32.

Billard

. Generalized two-dimensional bounded birth and death processes and some applications. J Appl Probab 1981; 18: 335–347.

33.

Parthasarathy

Sudhesh

. Exact transient solution of a state-dependent birth-death process. J Appl Math Stochastic Anal 2006; 2006: 1–16.

34.

Brandwajn

. An iterative solution of two-dimensional birth and death processes. Oper Res 1979; 27: 595–560.

35.

Hethcote

. The mathematics of infectious diseases. SIAM Rev 2000; 42: 599–653.

36.

O’Cinneide

. Characterization of phase-type distributions. Commun Stat Stochastic Models 1990; 6(1): 1–57.

37.

O’Cinneide

. Phase-type distribution: open problems and a few properties. Commun Stat Stochastic Models 1999; 15: 731–757.

38.

Shoukry

. A general pure death process model and the distribution of the time required to remove a fixed number of elements. Appl Stochastic Models Data Anal 1988; 4: 143–148.

39.

Rahmandad

Sterman

. Heterogeneity and network structure in the dynamics of diffusion: Comparing agent-based and differential equation models. Manag Sci 2008; 54: 998–1014.