Input data management is a crucial and time-consuming part of a simulation project. Consequently, improvement of this process has substantial potential to increase the rapidity of simulation projects, thus enabling more detailed analyses in design and development of production systems. This paper presents the development of a concept and an associated software demonstrator called the Generic Data Management Tool (GDM-Tool), which automates several critical and time-consuming data input activities. More specifically, raw data are extracted from multiple sources, with different data structures, and transformed to simulation input through data cleaning, calculations and distribution fitting, all done in one automated process. Finally, the simulation input is presented in the Core Manufacturing Simulation Data format, for further use in simulation applications. As a first step towards validation, the GDM-Tool was evaluated during a case study in the automotive industry. The results show that the time needed for input data management was reduced by 78%, as relative to a traditional manual approach.
Abdel-MalekLWolfCJohnsonF. OR Practice: survey results and reflections of practising INFORMS members. J Oper Res Soc1999; 50: 994–1030.
2.
ErikssonU. Diffusion of discrete event simulation in Swedish industry: on the way to an increased understanding. PhD Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2005.
3.
AkkermansHBertrandW. On the usability of quantitative modelling in operations strategy decision making. Int J Oper Prod Manag1997; 17: 953–966.
4.
MurphySPPereraT. Successes and failures in UK/US development of simulation. Simul Pract Theory2002; 9: 333–348.
5.
McLeanCLeongSK. The expanding role of simulation in future manufacturing. In: proceedings of the 2001 winter simulation conference, Arlington, VA, 2001, pp.1478–1486.
6.
JohanssonBJohnssonJKinnanderA. Information structure to support discrete event simulation in manufacturing systems. In: proceedings of the 2003 winter simulation conference, New Orleans, LA, 2003, pp.1290–1295.
7.
SkooghAJohanssonB. Mapping of the time-consumption during input data management activities. Simul News Eur2009; 19: 39–46.
8.
TrybulaW. Building simulation models without data. In: 1994 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics. Humans, information and technology1994, vol. 1, pp. 209–214.
9.
PereraTLiyanageK. Methodology for rapid identification of input data in the simulation of manufacturing systems. Simul Pract Theory2000; 7: 645–656.
10.
RobertsonNPereraT. Automated data collection for simulation?Simul Pract Theory2002; 9: 349–364.
11.
RandellLGBolmsjöGS. Database driven factory simulation: a proof-of-concept demonstrator. In: proceedings of the 2001 winter simulation conference, Arlington, VA, 2001, pp. 977–983.
12.
MoonYBPhatakD. Enhancing ERP system’s functionality with discrete event simulation. Ind Manag Data Syst2005; 105: 1206–1224.
13.
FowlerJWRoseO. Grand challenges in modeling and simulation of complex manufacturing systems. Simulation2004; 80: 469–476.
14.
SISO – Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization, CMSD Product Development Group. Standard for: core manufacturing simulation data - UML Model, 11May2009.
15.
RiddickFHLeeYT. Representing layout information in the CMSD specification. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference, Miami, FL, 2008, pp. 1777–1784.
16.
DavenportTHPrusakL. Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
17.
RobinsonS. Simulation: the practice of model development and use. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2004.
18.
RobinsonSBhatiaV. Secrets of successful simulation projects. In: proceedings of the 1995 winter simulation conference, Arlington, VA, 1995, pp.61–67.
19.
LawAMMcComasMG. How the ExpertFit distribution-fitting software can make your simulation models more valid. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, New Orleans, LA, 2003, pp.169–174.
20.
AltiokTMelamedB. Simulation modeling and analysis with ARENA. Electronic Resource: Academic Press, 2007.
21.
SkooghAAndréJ-PDudasC. An approach to input data management in discrete event simulation projects: a proof of concept demonstrator. In: Proceedings of the 6th EUROSIM congress on modelling and simulation, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2007.
22.
AufenangerMBleckenALaroqueC. Design and implementation of an MDA interface for flexible data capturing. J Simul2010; 4: 232–241.
23.
BowersSLudäscherB. An ontology driven framework for data transformation in scientific workflows. In: International workshop on data integration in the life sciences (DILS), Leipzig, Germany, 2004.
24.
Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization (SISO): SISO policies and procedures via http://www.sisostds.org (accessed 16 November 2010).
JohanssonMZachrissonR. Modeling automotive manufacturing process. MSc Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2006.
27.
JohanssonMLeongSKLeeYT. A test implementation of the core manufacturing simulation data specification. In: Proceedings of the 2007 winter simulation conference, Washington, DC, 2007, pp. 1673–1681.
28.
JohanssonMJohanssonBLeongSK. A real world pilot implementation of the core manufacturing simulation data model. In: proceedings of the summer computer simulation conference (SCSC08), Edinburgh, Scotland, 2008.
29.
JohanssonBFasthÅStahreJ. Enabling flexible manufacturing systems by using level of automation as design parameter. In: Proceedings of the 2009 winter simulation conference, Austin, TX, 2009, pp. 2176–2184.
30.
JohanssonBSkooghAManiM. Discrete event simulation to generate requirements specification for sustainable manufacturing systems design. In: Proceedings of the 2009 performance metrics for intelligent systems workshop (PerMIS’09), Gaithersburg, MA, 2009.
31.
BengtssonNEShaoGLeeYT. Input data management methodology for discrete event simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2009 winter simulation conference, Austin, TX, 2009, pp. 1335–1344.
32.
KibiraDLeongSK. Test of core manufacturing simulation data specification in automotive assembly. In: Proceedings of the Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization (SISO) and Society for Modeling and Simulation (SCS) international European multi conference, Orlando, FL, 2010.
33.
TaylorSJE. Interoperating COTS simulation modelling packages: a call for the standardisation of entity representation in the high level architecture object model template. In: Proceedings of the 2002 European simulation symposium, Dresden, Germany, 2002.
34.
ZeiglerBPPraehoferHKimTG. Theory of modeling and simulation: integrating discrete event and continuous complex dynamic systems. 2nd edn.San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2000.
35.
YinK. Case study research: design and methods. 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 1994.
36.
MontgomeryDCRungerGC. Applied statistics and probability for engineers. 2nd edn.New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1999.
37.
LikerJK. The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004.
38.
WilliamsEJ. Downtime data – its collection, analysis, and importance. In: Proceedings of the 1994 winter simulation conference, Orlando, FL, 1994, pp. 1040–1043.
39.
BalderudJOlofssonA. A plug-in based software architecture for generic data management. MSc Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2008.
