In this paper, we explore how component-based Modeling and Simulation can benefit from the Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model, which is a three-level interoperation model, by proposing an ontology-based and domain-independent approach supporting composability (conceptual level) and interoperability (during execution). The proposed approach is in accordance with three standards: High-level Architecture for the implementation level, Base Object Model for the conceptual level, and meta object facility for the knowledge level. We apply this approach in implementing a normalized large-scale rescue management system by reusing existing agent-based simulators. The proposed approach is useful for modeling complex systems and facilitating interoperation between models (conceptual level) and between simulators (implementation level).
Marmor YN, Sinreich D.POD: the structure of simulation software and model reuse. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference , 2007.
2.
Ma Y., He K., Liu W., Tian J.A grid-oriented platform for software component repository based on domain ontology. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC 2007), 2007.
3.
Szabo C., Teo YMOn syntactic composability and model reuse. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Modeling and Simulation, IEEE Computer Society Press, Thailand , March 2007, p.230-237.
4.
Page EH, Briggs R., Tufarolo JAToward a family of maturity models for the simulation interconnection problem . In: Proceedings of the Fall 2004 Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 04S-SIW-145, 2004.
5.
Tolk A., Diallo Y. and Turnitsa CDApplying the levels of conceptual interoperability model in support of integratability, interoperability composability for system-of-systems engineering . Syst Cybern Inf2008; 5(5): 65-74.
6.
Tolk A., Turnitsa CDConceptual modeling of information exchange requirements based on ontological means. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference, 2007, p.1100-1107.
7.
Petty MD, Weisel EWA composability lexicon. In: Proceedings of the Spring 2003 Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando FL, 30 March-4 April 2003, p. 181-187.
8.
Straβburger S.Distributed simulation based on the high level architecture in civilian application domains. Thesis presented 20 April 2001.
9.
SISO Base Object Model Product Development Group.Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization (SISO) Guide for Base Object Model (BOM) Use and Implementation. SISO-STD-003.1-2006, 31 March 2006.
10.
Moradi F.Component-based simulation model development using BOMs and web services . In: Proceedings of the First Asia International Conference on Modelling & Simulation (AMS’07), invited paper, 2007.
11.
Kralisch S. , Krause P., Fink M., Fischer C., Flügel W-A.Component based environmental modeling using the JAMS framework. In: Proceedings of MODSIM07, 2007.
12.
Rathnam T.Developing federation object models using ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference , 2004, p.1054-1052.
13.
Wittman Jr RL , Ly H.Medium resolution communications modeling in the OneSAF objective system. In: Proceedings of the Fall 2005 Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 05S-SIW-108, 2005.
14.
Seo C., Zeigler BPDEVS namespace for interoperable DEVS/SOA. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference, 2009.
15.
Yilmaz L. and Paspuleti S.Toward a meta-level framework for agent-supported interoperation of defense simulations. J Defense Model Simulat2005; 2(3): 161-175.
16.
Carson JSIntroduction to modeling and simulation. In: Proceedings of the 37th Winter Simulation Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, 4-7 December 2005, p.16-23.
17.
Shannon RESimulation modeling and methodology. In: Proceedings of the 76th Bicentennial Conference on Winter Simulation, 6-8 December 1976, p.9-15.
18.
Balci O., Arthur J., Nance R.Accomplishing reuse with a simulation conceptual model. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference, 978-1-4244-2708-6 , 2008, p.959-965.
19.
Tolk A., Muguira JAThe Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model (LCIM). In: Proceedings of the Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 03F-SIW-007, 2003.
20.
Tolk A., Diallo Y. and Turnitsa CDApplying the levels of conceptual interoperability model in support of integratability, interoperability, and composability for system-of-systems engineering. Syst, Cybern Inf2007; 5(5).
21.
Tolk A., Diallo YS, Turnitsa DCOntology driven interoperability - M&S applications. Whitepaper in support of the I/ITSEC Tutorial 2548, VMASC Report, Old Do-minion University, Suffolk, VA, 2006.
22.
Bréholée B.Interconnexion de simulations distribuées HLA. Thesis presented 8 March 2005.
23.
Zacharewicz G.Un environnement G-DEVS/HLA: application à la modélisation et simulation distribuée de WORKFLOW. Thèse Pour l’obtention du titre de Docteur de l’université Paul CézanneAix-Marseille III, N° d’identification 2006AIX30053: 30 November 2006.
24.
Straßburger S., Schulze T., Fujimoto R.Future trends in distributed simulation and distributed virtual environments. Peer Study Final Report initiated by the Fraunhofer IFF in Magdeburg, Version: 1.0, 17 January 2008.
25.
Brutzman D., Zyda M., Pullen M., Morse KLExtensible modeling and simulation framework (XMSF), opportunities for web-based modeling and simulation. Technical Opportunities Workshop Whitepaper , Naval Postgraduate School, 2002.
26.
Tolk A.Composable mission spaces and M&S repositories-applicability of open standards, paper 04S-SIW-009. In: Proceedings of the Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 2004.
27.
Kotiadis K. , Robinson S.Conceptual modelling: knowledge acquisition and model abstraction. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference , Miami, FL, USA, 7-10 December 2008 .
28.
Onggo B.Towards a unified conceptual model representation: a case study in healthcare . J Sim2009; 3: 40-49, doi:10.1057/jos.2008.14.
29.
Robinson S.Issues in conceptual modeling for simulation: setting a research agenda. In: Proceedings of the 2006 OR Society Simulation Workshop , 2006.
30.
Robinson S.Conceptual modelling for simulation part I: definition and requirements. J Oper Res Soc2008; 59(3): 278-290.
31.
Setavoraphan K., Grant FHConceptual simulation modeling: the structure of domain specific simulation environment. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference, 2008.
32.
Gustavson PL , Root LMUse cases - a blueprint approach for federation development, testing, and analysis. In: Proceedings of the Fall 99 Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 99F-SIW-112, 1999.
33.
Zeigler BP, Praehofer H., Kim TGTheory of modeling and simulation. Academic Press , 2000.
34.
Röhl M. , Uhrmacher AMComposing simulations from XML-specified model components. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, 2006.
35.
Tolk A. and Diallo SYModel based data engineering for web services. Accepted for publication in IEEE Internet Comput Mag2005.
36.
Bartholet G. , Brogan C., Reynolds F. and Carnahan C. In search of the Philosopher’s Stone: simulation composability versus component-based software design. 2004.
37.
Benali H., Bellamine BenSaoud N.Reuse & rescue management systems development. Poster presented in The 6th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management Publications (ISCRAM’2009) , Gothenburg, Sweden, 9 May 2009.
38.
Benali H., Amri R. and Bellamine BenSaoud N.Interoperability and large scale agent-based simulation: large scale rescue management case study. Workshop national en Informatique et Application (WIA’2008), Tozeur, Tunisia, 25 October-7 November 2008.
39.
Bellamine-Ben Saoud N., Ben Mena T., Dugdale J., Pavard B. and Ben Ahmed M.Assessing large scale emergency rescue plans: an agent based approach. Int J Intell Contr Syst2006; 11(4): 260-271, December, Special Issue on Emergency Management Systems (Guest Editors: Haibin Zhu and Murray Turoff).
40.
Jurisica I., Mylopoulos J., Yu E.Using ontologies for knowledge management: an information systems perspective . In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society for Information Sciences (ASIS’99), Washington, DC, November 1999.
41.
Gašević D., Djurić D. and Devedžić V. Converting UML to OWL ontologies. Comm ACM2004; 1-58113-912: 487-488.
42.
Harrald J., Jefferson T., Fiedrich F., Sener S., Mixted-Freeman C.A first step in decision support tools for humanitarian assistance during catastrophic disasters: modeling hazard generated needs. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM 2007), Delft, the Netherlands, 2007, p.51-56.
43.
Bénaben B., Hanachi C., Lauras M., Couget P., Chapurlat P.A metamodel and its ontology to guide crisis characterization and its collaborative management . In: Proceedings of the 5th International ISCRAM Conference, Washington, DC, USA, May 2008, p. 189-196.
44.
Ben Sassi S.Une Approche pour l’Assemblage Guidé de Composants COTS. Thesis presented in Ecole Nationale des Sciences de l’Informatique , 14 January 2006.
45.
Davis PK and Anderson RH‘Improving the Composability of Department of Defense Models and Simulations’ , Rand MonographMG101, http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG101/index.html ( 2003).
