Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Broadband packet networks must dynamically recognize some network flows, such as those that deal with disaster response, military operations, or emergencies, as having greater importance than others. An architecture of geographically distributed ticket servers has been proposed to issue importance tickets to identify the priority that a flow should be given in the current dynamic network context. Here the potential viability of such an architecture is studied with respect to the performance requirements of ticket servers, network overhead that would be added, and the severity of longer connection setup times. A hybrid simulation approach is used. Network and ticket server performance are modeled using prototype results combined with analytical techniques for networks of queues. Two scenarios are studied—a hurricane event and an office building bombing event—and ticket server performance requirements and connection setup delays were not found to be prohibitive to the successful implementation of such an architecture.

Keywords

Network management ticket servers performance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

[1] Brewin, B. 2001. Nation’s networks see sharp volume spikes after attacks . Computerworld, September 17.

[2] Noam, E. 2001. Testing the communications network . The New York Times, September 24.

[3] The President’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee, Network Group . 1999. Internet report: An examination of the NS/EP implications of Internet technologies. http://www.ncs.gov/nstac/NSTACreports.html

[4] National Communications System . 2000. Fiscal year 2000 annual report: Exploring solutions for communications reliability. Washington, DC: National Communications System .

[5] Federal Emergency Management Agency . 1995. Technology applications by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in response, recovery, and mitigation operations . Paper presented at the 27th Joint Meeting of the U.S./Japanese Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects, May, Tokyo/Osaka, Japan.

[6] Wilson, C. , and A. Lindstrom . 1989. Survival of the network: The single greatest disaster in U.S. history couldn’t take down telephone service . Telephony, October 23.

[7] Griswold, J. S. , T. L. Lightle , and J. G. Lovelady . 1990. Hurricane Hugo: Effect on state government communications . IEEE Communications Magazine, June, 12-17.

[8] Taylor, A. 1992. Andrew is brutal blow for agency . Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, September 12, 2703 .

[9] City of Oklahoma City . 1996. Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building bombing: Final report. Stillwater, OK: Fire Protection Publications .

10.

[10] Adamson, S. , and S. Gordon . 1993. Analysis of two trunk congestion relief schemes . In Proceedings of IEEE MILCOM ’93, pp. 902-906 .

11.

[11] Philip, G. , and R. Hodge . 1995. Disaster area architecture . In Proceedings of IEEE MILCOM, pp. 833-837 .

12.

[12] Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, National Research Council . 1996. Computing and communications in the extreme: Research for crisis management and other applications. Washington, DC: Computer Science and Telecommunications Board .

13.

[13] International Telecommunication Union (ITU) . 2000. Description of an international emergency preference scheme (IEPS). ITU-T Recommendation E.106. Geneva, Switzerland: ITU .

14.

[14] Beard, C. , and V. Frost . 2001. Prioritized resource allocation for stressed networks . IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 6 (5): 618-633 .

15.

[15] Beard, C. C. , and V. S. Frost . 2003. Ticket servers for network traffic prioritization . Journal of Network and Systems Management 11 (2): 151-170 .

16.

[16] DARPA Knowledge Sharing Initiative External Interfaces Working Group . 1993. DRAFT specification of the KQML agent-communication language, plus example agent policies and architectures. Palo Alto, CA . http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/knowledge-sharing/papers/kqml-spec.ps

17.

[17] Beard, C. 1999. Dynamic agent based prioritized resource allocation for stressed networks. Ph.D. diss., University of Kansas.

18.

[18] Clinton Administration Information Infrastructure Task Force . 1994. The effect of the National Information Infrastructure (NII) on local, state, and federal emergency management. Draft for comment, September 7.

19.

[19] Network Reliability and Interoperability Council, Focus Group 5 . 1996. Network reliability—The path forward: Telecommuting as a back-up in emergencies. Network Reliability and Interoperability Council .

20.

[20] Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) . 1999. Federal response Plan, emergency support function #9: Urban search and rescue annex. Washington, DC: FEMA .

Prioritization of Emergency Network Traffic Using Ticket Servers: A Performance Analysis

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References