The authors discuss the necessity of multiple flexible output forms in an educational Web simulation environment. Ideally, such an environment should allow the creation of visual, interactive simulations and their integration in the pages of the Web document being constructed. As a suitable candidate for this, the authors propose their system to generate documents for the Web that consists of three layers: continuous simulation language OOCSMP and its associated language layers SODA-1L and SODA- 2L. OOCSMP and SODA are compiled into Java applets and HTML/VRML pages by a compiler called C-OOL. Different output forms can be combined to solve and show the results of a simulation problem. The authors propose a procedure to guide the construction of educational courses on technical or scientific subjects with their tools. This procedure is used to enhance an existing educational Web course with a new page showing the simulation of a robot arm Unimation PUMA260.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Page, E. H., A. Buss, P. A. Fishwick, K. Healy, R. E. Nance, and R. J. Paul. 2000. “Web-based simulation: Revolution or evolution? ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation10 (1): 3-17 .
2.
2 Schmid, Ch. 1999. A remote laboratory using virtual reality on the Web . SIMULATION73: 13-21 .
3.
3 de Lara, J., and M. Alfonseca. 2000. Using simulation and virtual reality for distance education. SIIE’2000, November, Puertollano, Spain .
4.
4 Scholz-Reiter, B., W. Echelmeyer, T. Hamann, and J. Hoheisel. 2002. Games for engineering education . Proceedings of 16th European Simulation Multiconference ESM’2002, Darmstadt, Germany, pp. 391-394 .
5.
5 Bryson, S. 1996. Virtual reality in scientific visualization . Communications of the ACM39 (5): 62-71 .
6.
6 Bredeweg, B., and R. Winkels. 1998. Qualitative models in interactive learning environments: An introduction . Interactive Learning Environments5: 1-18 .
8 Schank, R. C., and C. Cleary. 1995. Engines for education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
9.
9 de Lara, J., and M. Alfonseca. 2001. Constructing simulation-based Web documents . IEEE Multimedia, January-March, 42-49 .
10.
10 Lorenz, P., H. Dorwarth, K. C. Ritter, and T. J. Schriber. 1997. Towards a Web-based simulation Environment . Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference, Society for Computer Simulation, pp. 1338-1344 .
11.
11 Fishwick, P. A. 1996. Web-based simulation: Some personal observations . Proceedings of the 1996 Winter Simulation Conference, Coronado, CA, pp. 772-779 .
12.
12 Alfonseca, M., J. de Lara, and H. Vangheluwe. 2001. Web-based simulation of systems described by partial differential equations . Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Arlington, VA, pp. 629-636 .
13.
13 Bajaj, C., and S. Cutchin. 1997. Web based collaboration aware synthetic environments . Proceedings of the TeamCAD Gvu/Nist Workshop on Collaborative Design, pp. 143-150 . See also SHAS- TRA Web page at http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/CCV/projects/shastra
14.
14 Bidarra, R., E. Van Den Berg, and W. F. Bronsvoort. 2001. Interactive facilities for collaborative feature modeling on the Web . Proceedings of the 10th Portuguese Conference on Computer Graphics, Lisbon, Portugal. See also http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/~eelco/publications.html
15.
15 Kuljis, J., and R. J. Paul. 2001. An appraisal of Web-based simulation: Whither we wander? Simulation Practice and Theory9: 37-54 .
16.
16 Healy, K. J., and R. A. Kilgore. 1997. Silk: A Java-based process simulation language . Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference, Atlanta, GA, pp. 475-482 .
17.
17 Roccetti, M., P. Salomoni, and M. E. Bonfigli. 2001. A design for a simulation-based multimedia learning environment . SIMULATION76 (4): 214-221 .
18.
18 Alfonseca, M., J. de Lara, and G. Montoro. 2002. Teaching partial-differential equations through the Internet: An interactive approach . Proceedings of the 16th European Simulation Multiconference, ESM’2002, Darmstadt, Germany, pp. 395-399 .
19.
19 IBM Corp. 1972. Continuous System Modelling Program III (CSMP III) and Graphic Feature (CSMP III Graphic Feature) general information manual. Ontario, Canada: IBM .
20.
20 Alfonseca, M., E. Pulido, R. Orosco, and J. de Lara. 1997. OOC- SMP: An object-oriented simulation language. ESS’97, Passau , pp. 44-48.
21.
21 Alfonseca, M., and J. de Lara. 2002. Simulating evolutionary agent colonies with OOCSMP . Proceedings of the 17th ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC’2002), AI and Computational Logic, March, Madrid, Spain, pp. 11-15 .
22.
22 Myers, B. A., E. Borison, A. Ferrency, R. McDaniel, R. C. Miller, A. Faulring, B. D. Kyle, P. Doane, A. Mickish, and A. Klimovitski. 1997. The Amulet v3.0 reference manual. Technical Report No. CMU-CS-95-166-R2 and Human Computer Interaction Institute Technical Report No. CMU-HCII-95-102-R2, Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science.
23.
23 Alfonseca, M., J. de Lara, and E. Pulido. 1999. Dynamical object generation during the execution of continuous simulation models . Argentine Symposium on Object Orientation 1999 (ASOO 99), September, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
24.
24 Alfonseca, M., J. de Lara, and E. Pulido. 1999. Semiautomatic generation of Web courses by means of an object-oriented simulation language . SIMULATION73: 5-12 .
25.
25 Leonardo, L. 1997. Using Netscape LiveConnect: Special edition. Indianapolis, IN: Que Corporation . See also Netscape ftp site: ftp.netscape.com in pub/sdk/plugin/windows/oct_21_97
26.
26 Hartman, J., and J. Wernecke. 1996. TheVRML2.0handbook: Building moving worlds on the Web. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
27.
27 de Lara, J., and H. Vangheluwe. 2002. AToM3: A tool for multiformalism modelling and meta-modelling . Lecture Notes in Computer Science2306: 174-188 . See the AToM3 homepage: http://atom3.cs.mcgill.ca/
28.
Also presented in the Graph Transformations and Visual Modelling Techniques (GT-VMT) workshop at the 1st International Conference on Graph Transformations, October, Barcelona, Spain. Available: http://www.elsevier.nl/locate/entcs/volume72.html
29.
29 Fu, K. S., R. C. Gonzalez, and C. S. G. Lee. 1987. Robotics: Control, sensing, vision, and intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill .
30.
30 Booch, G., J. Rumbaugh, and I. Jacobson. 1999. The unified modelling language user guide. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley . See also the UML homepage at http://www.uml.org
31.
31 Craig, J. J. 1989. Introduction to robotics. 2d ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
32.
32 Foley, J. D., A. van Dam, S. K. Feiner, and J. F. Hughes. 1993. Computer graphics principles and practice. 2d ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
33.
33 Hopkins, J. F., and P. Fishwick. 2002. The rube TM methodology for 3-D software engineering . Lecture Notes in Computer Science2269: 368-380 .
34.
34 Lee, K., and P. Fishwick. 1999. OOPM/RT: A multimodeling methodology for real-time simulation . ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation9 (2): 141-170 .
35.
35 Budhu, M. 2001. Enhancing instructions using interactive multimedia simulations . SIMULATION76 (4): 222-231 .
36.
36 Mora, M. A., and R. Moriyón. 2001. Collaborative analysis and tutoring: The FACT framework . Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT’01), Madison, WI, pp. 82-85 .
