The ability of tug escort vessels to save oil-laden tankers that become disabled in Prince William Sound, Alaska, is tested using a simulation of the drift path of the tankers. Tug escort schemes are intended to save tankers that have lost steering or propulsion by attaching a line and either holding the tanker from running aground until a repair can be made or towing the tanker to port. The ability of an escort tug to save disabled tankers depends on its position at the time of the accident; the location, speed, and direction of the tanker at the time of the failure; and the wind and current conditions that changed dynamically during a save attempt. To accurately test the save capability of a proposed escort scheme, a simulation of Prince William Sound is created that models dynamic changes in environmental conditions and thus the movement of the tanker.
Prince William Sound Tanker Association . 1995. Vessel escort and response plan. Valdez, Alaska: Prince William Sound Tanker Association.
2.
Det Norske Varitas , Rennslaer Polytechnic Institute, and George Washington University. 1996. The Prince William Sound risk assessment: Final report. Report to the Prince William Sound Risk Assessment Steering Committee.
3.
National Research Council . 1986. Crew size and maritime safety. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4.
National Research Council . 1991. Tanker spills: Prevention by design. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5.
National Research Council . 1994. Minding the helm: Marine navigation and piloting. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6.
National Research Council . 2000. Risk management in the marine transportation system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7.
Pravda, M. F. , and R. G. Lightner. 1966. Conceptual study of a supercritical reactor plant for merchant ships. Marine Technology4:230-238.
8.
Stiehl, G. L.1977. Prospects for shipping liquefied natural gas. Marine Technology14 (4): 351-378.
9.
Paté-Cornell, M. E.1990. Organizational aspects of engineering system safety: The case of offshore platforms. Science250 (4985): 1210-1217.
10.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission . 1975. Reactor safety study: An assessment of accident risks in U.S. commercial nuclear power plants. Report No. WASH-1400 (NUREG-75/014).
11.
Hara, K. , and S. Nakamura. 1995. A comprehensive assessment system for the maritime traffic environment. Safety Science19:203-215.
12.
Roeleven, D. , M. Kok, H. L. Stipdonk, and W. A. de Vries. 1995. Inland waterway transport: Modeling the probabilities of accidents. Safety Science19:191-202.
13.
Kite-Powell, H. L. , D. Jin, N. M. Patrikalis, J. Jebsen, and V. Papakonstantinou. 1996. Formulation of a model for ship transit risk. MIT Sea Grant Technical Report 96-19, Cambridge, MA.
14.
Slob, W.1998. Determination of risks on inland waterways. Journal of Hazardous Materials61:363-370.
15.
Fowler, T. G. , and E. Sorgard. 2000. Modeling ship transportation risk. Risk Analysis20 (2): 225-244.
16.
Trbojevic, V. M. , and B. J. Carr. 2000. Risk based methodology for safety improvements in ports. Journal of Hazardous Materials71:467-480.
17.
Wang, J.2000. A subjective modeling tool applied to formal ship safety assessment. Ocean Engineering27:1019-1035.
18.
Guedes Soares, C. , and A. P. Teixeira. 2001. Risk assessment in maritime transportation. Reliability Engineering and System Safety74:299-309.
19.
Andrews, S. , F. H. Murphy, X. P. Wang, and S. Welch. 1996. Modeling crude oil lightering in Delaware Bay. Interfaces26 (6): 68-78.
20.
Golkar, J. , A. Shekhar, and S. Buddhavarapu. 1998. Panama Canal simulation model. Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1229-1237.
21.
Ryan, N. K. 1998. The future of maritime facility designs and operations. Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1223-1227.
22.
Merrick, J. , J. R. van Dorp, J. Harrald, T. Mazzuchi, J. Spahn, and M. Grabowski. 2000. A systems approach to managing oil transportation risk in Prince William Sound. Systems Engineering3 (3): 128-142.
23.
van Dorp, J. R. , J. R. W. Merrick, J. Harrald, T. Mazzuchi, and M. Grabowski. 2001. A risk management procedure for the Washington state ferries. Risk Analysis21 (1): 127-142.
24.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).1997. Ship drift analysis for the Northwest Olympic Peninsula and the Strait of Juan de Fuca. HAZMAT Report 97-3.
25.
Lewison, G. R. G. 1981. Experimental determination of wind, wave and drift forces on large tankers. Paper presented at the Symposium on Behavior of Disabled Large Tankers, June, London.
26.
Smeaton, G. P. 1981. A mathematical model of the drift of disabled large tankers. Paper presented at the Symposium on Behavior of Disabled Large Tankers, June, London.
27.
Holder, L. A. , J. Werkoven, and G. F. Williams. 1981. Research on disabled tankers: Operational and training implications. Paper presented at the Symposium on Behavior of Disabled Large Tankers, June, London.
28.
Banks, J. , J. S. Carson, B. L. Nelson, and D. M. Nicol. 2000. Discrete-event system simulation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29.
Bedford, T. M. , and R. M. Cooke. 2001. Probabilistic risk analysis: Foundations and method. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Cooke, R. M.1991. Experts in uncertainty: Expert opinion and subjective probability in science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31.
Harrald, J. , T. Mazzuchi, J. Merrick, R. van Dorp, and J. Spahn. 1998. Using system simulation to model the impact of human error in a maritime system. Safety Science30:235-247.
32.
Merrick, J. R. W. , J. R. van Dorp, T. A. Mazzuchi, and J. Harrald. 2001. Modeling risk in the dynamic environment of maritime transportation. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1090-1098.
